Ebert "Star Wars" at Intertops

[GoBlue 0]

Ebert's "Star Wars": Which movie will get more stars?

Bruce Almighty -400
The In-Laws +250
Draw +300


The fact that you wouldn't push on a draw kind of scares me away. Plus the fact that the max bet is $55 makes betting on Bruce Almighty meaniningless.

 

[Gillian 0]

Still, if you lay $55 on BA it's an easy $13.75 in return. I don't see Bruce Almighty losing to the In-Laws. My motto is... every little bit helps.

Gil.

 

[Gillian 0]

Actually...

I have read some good reviews for The In-Laws:
http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/i/in-laws.html

also... i don't know if Ebert is religous... but he might not like the fact that Jim Carrey is playing God. Just some points to ponder. With +250... I'm starting to think picking The In-laws might be an okay thing to do.

Gil

 

[Royler 0]

I'd be tempted by the In-Laws prop...Ebert doesn't usually go for Carrey's high-concept comedies, but he loves Albert Brooks. I'm seeing two stars for "Almighty" and three for "In-Laws."

Just not worth those piddly limits at Intertops.

 

[SoundofSilence 0]

Agreed... Not worth it with the small limits, but I also don't think its a very smart bet either way... He gave Me, Myself, and Irene 1.5 stars, but Liar Liar 3 stars, so he's pretty hard to judge - I thought they both sucked. And IMO, In-Laws doesn't look too promising either... If there was *any* value on this one, I'd almost have to say it was on Draw at 3 to 1 odds.

 

[Oren1 0]

I don't like these Ebert wagers anymore without Rod Bovine around to offer his <help.>

 

[Gillian 0]

I'm laying some bread on the In-laws, too. NOW THAT THE ODDS HAVE DROPPED. $55 is somewhat high though... I need a sportsbook with a 50 cent limit.
yeeeehaaaaa!!!!!

Gil.