here is what 7 year member POWERS says---
During the football season i got reacquanted with a fellow that worked in the industry. he knew of some insiders that could tell us where square money and sharp money was moving. as skeptical as many of you are still -we wanted proof so after receiving their emails of many winners - powers and i sent them money to give my acquantance a shot. we receive daily emails of the plays and a balance at the end of each day.
we have been able to make two
withdrawals, once at the end of nov and dec. with the way today has unfolded for us as we hit all games..... should that continue we will have another at the end of this month.
Each time we make a withdrawal (on profits only) we are subject to a 30% fee that we pay them on a job well done. though i said at the end of the day it was only not to complicate things. after all - at the time i could not disclose how this works at the request and respect of the mods here. we don't pay a fee at all for withdrawing when no profit is made.
as an example
let's say we put in $1000 and the fund reaches
10k - at that point we do a withdrawl. we pay them
30% of 9k which is $2700. math is 10k minus what we
contributed = profit.
let's give a losing scenario ....we pay $2000 we withdraw $1,999 we pay no fee, because no profit is made.
Everyday they email us the plays sometimes right at the
last minute sometimes ahead of time, we decided to share
some of the plays we receive ahead of time, and as best we can the late, last minute plays. they also let us know when plays are done for the day or if there are more potentials.
we figured if we could make $5000 and keep only $3500 it was still a good deal. as good as powers and i are at capping this has just made us better.
if you still feel it is paid for service call it whatever you want. doesn't matter to us. as an analogy if a stock broker said to you i'll show you my winning track record and then you decide with my style of investing to use me or not
would that sound ok by you? it would for me.
upon seeing that on paper he could increase the amount of money i had would that be ok?
then if i tried him out and the results were the same on paper that would be ok too right?
well the broker and the house charge a fee for their services. we pay it because it is a rule. 3% of both buy and selling of the transaction.
so why the big deal? the difference to us is...the broker gets a fee for the buy and the sell regardless of whether you make money or not.
this arrangement we have is for profits only. so who is the real scamdicapper in these two similar investing scenarios?
we are happy with the results and to us that is the only thing that matters.
During the football season i got reacquanted with a fellow that worked in the industry. he knew of some insiders that could tell us where square money and sharp money was moving. as skeptical as many of you are still -we wanted proof so after receiving their emails of many winners - powers and i sent them money to give my acquantance a shot. we receive daily emails of the plays and a balance at the end of each day.
we have been able to make two
withdrawals, once at the end of nov and dec. with the way today has unfolded for us as we hit all games..... should that continue we will have another at the end of this month.
Each time we make a withdrawal (on profits only) we are subject to a 30% fee that we pay them on a job well done. though i said at the end of the day it was only not to complicate things. after all - at the time i could not disclose how this works at the request and respect of the mods here. we don't pay a fee at all for withdrawing when no profit is made.
as an example
let's say we put in $1000 and the fund reaches
10k - at that point we do a withdrawl. we pay them
30% of 9k which is $2700. math is 10k minus what we
contributed = profit.
let's give a losing scenario ....we pay $2000 we withdraw $1,999 we pay no fee, because no profit is made.
Everyday they email us the plays sometimes right at the
last minute sometimes ahead of time, we decided to share
some of the plays we receive ahead of time, and as best we can the late, last minute plays. they also let us know when plays are done for the day or if there are more potentials.
we figured if we could make $5000 and keep only $3500 it was still a good deal. as good as powers and i are at capping this has just made us better.
if you still feel it is paid for service call it whatever you want. doesn't matter to us. as an analogy if a stock broker said to you i'll show you my winning track record and then you decide with my style of investing to use me or not
would that sound ok by you? it would for me.
upon seeing that on paper he could increase the amount of money i had would that be ok?
then if i tried him out and the results were the same on paper that would be ok too right?
well the broker and the house charge a fee for their services. we pay it because it is a rule. 3% of both buy and selling of the transaction.
so why the big deal? the difference to us is...the broker gets a fee for the buy and the sell regardless of whether you make money or not.
this arrangement we have is for profits only. so who is the real scamdicapper in these two similar investing scenarios?
we are happy with the results and to us that is the only thing that matters.