Do owners bet on their teams?

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
591
Tokens
And almost just as stupid an argument as to why they don't.

Do you think Michael Jordan or Charles Barkley needs the extra money? Think Pete Rose needed the money.

That said, OF COURSE the Rooneys don't bet on the Steelers.


Horse breeders are millionaires they don't need money. You don't think they don't bet on their horses
 

New member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
591
Tokens
yeah baby, You see, Even though we own the team, the players are the real spoiled millionaires, we are still poor and need extra income to make ends meet.

Our regular income is food stamps, as our fat payroll all goes to the players weekly pay checks. And since we can't buy booze with food stamps, we have to gamble on our teams to find some beer money to get through the long and grueling season.:missingte:missingte:missingte


are you speaking from personal experience? gambliing should be for excitement not for income. How many people on here do you think depend on gambling for their primary income?
 
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
3,700
Tokens
Horse breeders are millionaires they don't need money. You don't think they don't bet on their horses
read my post aunt jamima...I was saying that just b/c people are rich doesn't mean they don't bet: hench the examples of Michael Jordan and barkley
 

A Separate Reality
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
5,533
Tokens
Gauging the responders here, I"d wager none of you are over 35. Of course some owners bet on their teams. Al Davis is notorious for trying to cover the spread. There is a book that came out in the mid seventies, i forgot the name but in it there are at least 9 instances of the raiders going for spread covers. 10 seconds left Raiders up by 4 at opponents 5 yardline 4th down Raiders can take a knee and end the game. instead they call a time out and kick the FG. oh yeah raiders were favored by 6. asked why he kicked a fg, davis replied "tie breaker, if we finished tied with a team on of the tie breakers is total points scored." tie breaker was Davis's standard answer for all the questionable play calling.

rumor has it that his young coach is not going along with the program (playing for cover) and has told the old man so. if i was davis i'd fire the young punk too. "the nerve of these young punks, you think i'm sitting at the game and not calling the shots."
 

New member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
591
Tokens
Gauging the responders here, I"d wager none of you are over 35. Of course some owners bet on their teams. Al Davis is notorious for trying to cover the spread. There is a book that came out in the mid seventies, i forgot the name but in it there are at least 9 instances of the raiders going for spread covers. 10 seconds left Raiders up by 4 at opponents 5 yardline 4th down Raiders can take a knee and end the game. instead they call a time out and kick the FG. oh yeah raiders were favored by 6. asked why he kicked a fg, davis replied "tie breaker, if we finished tied with a team on of the tie breakers is total points scored." tie breaker was Davis's standard answer for all the questionable play calling.

rumor has it that his young coach is not going along with the program (playing for cover) and has told the old man so. if i was davis i'd fire the young punk too. "the nerve of these young punks, you think i'm sitting at the game and not calling the shots."


Interesting. Thanks for the responce. Alistaire Cookie had a good point also.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
2,708
Tokens
Where is the public info that he bet millions on the niners?

i guess you weren't around whent hey were throw ing bombs to jerry rice to insure spread victories. If you really want to see what I mean. go watch the 4th quarter of the super bowl when they beat the snot out of san diego. at the end of the game sd got a couple of TD's and were within one more td of covering the enormous spread. All the starters were hustled back in and reminded what the spread was. they weren't gonna let some backdoor cover take the luster off their win or money out of their bosses pockets. I don't think it was just the owners either, soem of the players had to be betting too. They'd be up 24 in the 3rd quatrer and you'd swear they were down 14 with they play calling. the Cowboys of the 90's played like they bet and knew what the spread was too.
 

THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
15,353
Tokens
They probably don't bet, but the OP's question is legit. I didn't watch the game, but if Pitt was in FG position at the end and down by more than 8, why wouldn't they have kicked a FG?


This same shit happens in the NFL every season and it can go either way depending on the coach. It sucks to lose money on a deciison like this, but it happens. I was on the wrong end last year a couple times MF'n the tv.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,986
Messages
13,575,780
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com