Well I confess having not read a VitD post directly (save for Quoted portions in other members Replies) for probably at least a year. But IIRC, he's never been one for diverse expression. I did a casual anal-ysis of his first 1000 or so posts and found that they were basically about 20 different posts reset about 50+ times or more each. I presume his go-to "position" regarding slam of Republican homosexuals is similarly limited
Well I confess having not read a VitD post directly (save for Quoted portions in other members Replies) for probably at least a year. But IIRC, he's never been one for diverse expression. I did a casual anal-ysis of his first 1000 or so posts and found that they were basically about 20 different posts reset about 50+ times or more each. I presume his go-to "position" regarding slam of Republican homosexuals is similarly limited
Editorial Of The Day
From the Los Angeles Times:
From the Los Angeles Times:
That a particular social change may be inevitable, given certain background conditions, does not mean that opponents will cease fighting it. White Southerners continued to massively resist Brown long after most of them came to believe that school desegregation was inevitable. Similarly, those who believe that gay marriage contravenes God's will are not likely to stop fighting it simply because their prospects of success are diminishing. Moreover, because religious conservatives are both intensely opposed to gay marriage and highly mobilized politically, they are likely for the next several years to continue exerting significant influence over Republican politicians who need their support to win primary elections. Although the ultimate outcome of the contest over gay marriage no longer seems in doubt, plenty of fighting remains until that battle is over.
Reading comprehension must not have been a strong suit of yours; I will give you an A for effort in deflection, you have become quite the "student" when it comes to turning the tables when you are busted. Unfortunately your inane talking points eventually catch up to you.
I can't believe I let an amateur like you get me off my point. Try to dig up another source when you attempt to compare the pubs with the dems in the field of gay or alternative lifestyle. You use the same "toe tappin" reference every time; it appears to be a pattern of yours as noted by other members.
Come back with facts, or don't come at all.
What in the world are u talking about? Busted what? You are a mental case.
U think foley and craig are the only repubs involved in gay scandals. Do a google search and some reading. Plenty of them out there.
Tryin to move those goalposts again huh? Don't worry....the usual idiot repubs here will buy it.
2 is still more then 1. You want me to search at state and local level politicians? Because I know there is more. You lost.
Speaking of facts. I was banned at one site and then asked to come back with apologies because I was banned by a right wing conservative mod. Prob liked cock as well. But hey....don't let the facts get in the way of your little story.
