DEB's "BOOK" on the AFC Championship Game

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
129
Tokens
Deb12 said:
The 2001 AFC Championship game held in Pittsburgh was the last time that the pats actually played a road playoff game, it'll be interesting to see how THEY handle a hostile playoff crowd.

Deb


I could'nt agree more........if anyone remembers that game.......the Pats got a special teams td return and I think another special teams "big play" and Brady got hurt and Bledsoe came in and played damn good. This is by far the Pats biggest test yet.........I say that if Brady can step up big this game then I am a believer. Remember his last "road game" he didnt look so great against Miami........
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
3,761
Tokens
Deb12 said:
The 2001 AFC Championship game held in Pittsburgh was the last time that the pats actually played a road playoff game, it'll be interesting to see how THEY handle a hostile playoff crowd.

Deb
They are the champions until proven other-wise. You don,t bet against champions until they show a sign of weak-nes. N.E is not showing any signs. Why is a team with the better record (pitt 15-1, ne 14-2) a home dog, especially since pitts beat ne at home already? The line tells me that N.E is 6 points better than Pittsburgh. The game is not won by who has the better stats, its won between the lines.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
283
Tokens
They are the champions until proven other-wise. You don,t bet against champions until they show a sign of weak-nes. N.E is not showing any signs. Why is a team with the better record (pitt 15-1, ne 14-2) a home dog, especially since pitts beat ne at home already? The line tells me that N.E is 6 points better than Pittsburgh. The game is not won by who has the better stats, its won between the lines.

twjd...

The pats were installed as favorites because of "Public perception", the oddmakers are not stupid...they hung 2.5 points on this game knowing full well that most of Joe Public would think like you and lay the "less than a FG" price...and that is exactly what has happened and of course is the reason that the line moved to a solid 3 spot.

If you had been watching the MoneyLine all week then you would have noticed that you are paying increased juice to get the Steelers with the solid 3 spot, by moving the number on the game but making you pay a higher juice price on the line itself is the oddsmakers way of balancing things out.

Don't be fooled...Pittsburgh is the better team in this matchup, I would advise that you take the offered points in addition to making a play on the moneyline for Pittsburgh to win straight up, I would also advise that you take Pittsburgh on a futures wager NOW to win the Super Bowl as a means to avoid having to lay a huge number to either the Eagles or the falcons.

take care

Deb
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
283
Tokens
I could'nt agree more........if anyone remembers that game.......the Pats got a special teams td return and I think another special teams "big play" and Brady got hurt and Bledsoe came in and played damn good. This is by far the Pats biggest test yet.........I say that if Brady can step up big this game then I am a believer. Remember his last "road game" he didnt look so great against Miami........<!-- / message -->

Hello maverick2112..

You are entirely correct with regard to the Steeler defense knocking Pat QB Tom Brady out of the game and Drew Bledsoe coming into the game in relief of Brady...If that happens this time the pats are in SERIOUS trouble with regard to Davey being their backup.

Pittsburgh's backup is former starter Tommy Maddox who WAS the starting QB before going down with an elbow injury versus Baltimore, in my opinion Pittsburgh has the best backup QB of any team remaining in the playoffs.

take care and be well

Deb
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
283
Tokens
Thanks for your contributions and good luck the rest of the way. :103631605


Hello winbet...

Thank you very much for your kind words and good luck to you also sir!!

Deb
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
621
Tokens
Deb

Thanks for your time and effort, I too like the Steelers. I am also looking at U35 for the game.

Blue Raider
 

Professional At All Times
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
42,732
Tokens
Deb12:

Even though we will be on opposite sides of this game, just wanted to extend my appreciation to you for taking the time in providing your very thoughtful analysis as well as responding in many threads with your insight and comments. You're a great addition to the RX and simply want to wish you all the best in the future.
 

Red Sox Fan
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
14
Tokens
Everyone ,and there brother is on the pats. I love the Steelers in this spot.Good d-fence, good running game ,and 3 pts.that I don't think they will need.Steelers win this game.:103631605
 

RELAX,im just having fun
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,042
Tokens
el iguana untill now i didnt realize retrodictive wasnt a word:icon_conf .i didnt make it up i heard it in conversation 2 years ago from jeff sagarin.i met him in las vegas and we spoke about his ratings system and how the RPI ties into them for the ncaa selection committee to determine the participants for march madness. the guys a grad from MIT so when he used the word i asked him what it meant. your assumption of its meaning is correct.his exact words were "i use retrodictive methods in my ratings".....what was will be again. history repeats itself.all things in life and in sport eventually comes full circle. hes a very linear man. talking to him was an experience i wont ever forget. he lives in ohio and is a huge sports nut. that trip to vegas 2 years ago was unreal.i met alot of so called vegas legends. anyway theres the history behind the word retrodictive.~RG
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
3,961
Tokens
nice lengthy writeup deb,

meaningless stats and trends are another way to say "parity".
parity was not invented by, nor at the time of free agency, it has been around since the merger, this all comes back to..."the more things change, the more they stay the same", this is why meaningless stats and trends are being kept, logged, and put out on display, because if you forget history your doomed to repeat it.
all love here for ya, and no disrespect at all but around a year ago, from now the talk on this forum was neng had just won thier 2nd superbowl in three years and this team is destined to be a dynasty.
this was pretty much the consensus, "what changed?"
since then neng won 15 of thier last 17 games, gained a upgrade in thier running game, are on the brink of returning to the superbowl again,(as anticipated), and have behind the helm a qb whose proven calm , cool and deliberate play in big games have all the intentions of a stone-cold killer.

i hate to tip my hand as to my plays before i call the stadiums sunday for the weather reports and post my stuff, but...as a friend of yours, "i hope", jump off pittsburgh now while you got plenty of time to do so.

GAME.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
Deb great in-depth write up....You stated the line is made to split the action that is not always what happens....The linesmakers like to play tricks with the number and movement depending on who is placing the bet...

I have seen alot of times the linesmaker/book put up an odd line and the public hammer said side all week and day just to see the line move the other way for unexplained reasons...These lines are not to split action they are made to agree with public perception on the game so the book gets lopsided action and make a killing...

Like you stated this line is made on public perception and maybe everybody (public) is on the Pats 3 - 1... So far From what I know the "smarter money has not placed a wager on this game...Maybe the linesmaker outsmarted themselves this time thinking if they made Pitt a homedog the public would take them as it looked to good to be true...

As for me I am looking to the Pats not on stats but on intangibles...

It looks close to me but I have to believe the difference will be the qb's and coaching...

I would not surprise me if the Pats come out with 4/5 wr's and make Pitt play their 3/4 db's which can be exploited as it is their weakest defense...
If the Pats do this the Steelers would have to pull a lineman/linebacker or two for db's...In this alignment if the Steelers do not sack the qb they will get beat and beat bad as the db's will not be able to cover what the Pats and Brady throw at them...

Also watching the total get hammered down and looking at the over...

Deb great write up/insight...I respect your knowledge just look at different things and try to think what will happen....

Good Luck...T Hawk
 

Siempre vive RX
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,765
Tokens
Roxygurl, that's really cool that you got to meet Jeff Sagarin! I would love the chance to pick that dude's brain, but both of you are so much smarter than I am, it would probably be demoralizing for me.

"Retrodictive" ain't in my dictionary, but it's gonna be in my vernacular from now on, Baby!!!! GL this weekend. :suomi:
 

RELAX,im just having fun
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,042
Tokens
el iguana sagarin is on a very different level from alot of us. this guy is so cerebral it was difficult following him. retrodictive is in HIS own mental dictionary and i just figured it was a real word.maybe it is a very common word among his peers. theres alot of sagarin wannabes in the power rating field. he was a different kind of guy but once i got thru his weird exterior he was a sports guy thru and thru. he hears the sports talkers rip him for being a geek who has no real place in the sports world,.but in the end its his ratings on 1 team or another were betting on and he has the formula that decides who gets into the big dance. thats his power trip.lol.friggn crazy huh?
 

I can't dance
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
1,098
Tokens
roxygurl,

Thanks for this word, "retrodict" is an actual word, I had to look it up too! http://www.m-w.com/

It is not an easy word to understand!

In my mind, I think the word can be best explained from using a psycho/analysis example.

Suppose someone is there lying on a psychiatrist's couch, trying to work out the problems of their past. Such an endeavor is retrodictive, because the patient & therapist are trying to explain the past and the person. However, explaining one's psychological past or exposing mental demons, is not indicative of what the patient may or may not do in the future. Explaining the past, does not necessary mean it modifies behaviour, it does not predict.

Therefore, psychological therapy is a retrodictive exercise, and not a predictive activity. Sounds about right, no?

For that guy Jeff Sagarin to use "retrodictive methods" in conversation, I think he is saying "I know why that happened, (but I'm not gonna talk about if that is gonna happen again)". :icon_conf ;)
 

RELAX,im just having fun
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,042
Tokens
lmao. well said polaris. hearing it straight from him was exactly like that.i just kept nodding my head like i knew all about this stuff. he must know something tho. if illinois is #1 why is duke #1 in the sagarin ratings? what was will be again.:think2: ~RG
 

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
3,761
Tokens
Deb12 said:
twjd...

The pats were installed as favorites because of "Public perception", the oddmakers are not stupid...they hung 2.5 points on this game knowing full well that most of Joe Public would think like you and lay the "less than a FG" price...and that is exactly what has happened and of course is the reason that the line moved to a solid 3 spot.

If you had been watching the MoneyLine all week then you would have noticed that you are paying increased juice to get the Steelers with the solid 3 spot, by moving the number on the game but making you pay a higher juice price on the line itself is the oddsmakers way of balancing things out.

Don't be fooled...Pittsburgh is the better team in this matchup, I would advise that you take the offered points in addition to making a play on the moneyline for Pittsburgh to win straight up, I would also advise that you take Pittsburgh
on a futures wager NOW to win the Super Bowl as a means to avoid having to lay a huge number to either the Eagles or the falcons.

take care

Deb

The public don't make the opening line, yes the lines-makers try to put out a line they think the public will bet on both sides, however they usually make the favorite the better team. N.E is the favorite because of one reason. Both teams are equal in all positions except one the Quarterback position. How many rookie Q.B's have made it to the superbowl? Think about it, if Ben was the Q.B for N.E, and Brady was the Q.B for Pitts, who would be the favorite? The line would probably be Pitts -3. I was born in Pitttsburgh, I wouldn't mind seeing them make it to the Superbowl, I hope that if the rookie is playing like a rookie they pull him and put Maddox in the game.
Philly/ATL, who has the better Q.B, Vick or McNabb? I like Mr. Vick's style, however I think McNabb is better overall Q.B. I think this game will be closer than the Pitt/N.E game.
Don't let thay early line on the AFC to win the superbowl fool you. Don't you think the lines-makers know the public is going to be on the AFC! These are 4 good teams they all have won 14 games and more, all 4 teams have a good defense, if you rank them by the Q.B position it would be N.E, Phlly, ATL, Pitts.
One last comment, If Randy Johnson was pitching against a rookie pitcher for the Redsox's who would you bet on?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
81
Tokens
twjd said:
all 4 teams have a good defense, if you rank them by the Q.B position it would be N.E, Phlly, ATL, Pitts.


One last comment, If Randy Johnson was pitching against a rookie pitcher for the Redsox's who would you bet on?

"Good defenses" normally get shredded and great ones dominate in the Super Bowl. Remember the "good" Giant defense that had just shut out Minnesota?
<i> Trent Dilfer's </i> team scored 33 points on it.

I would not mind betting any 14-0 rookie against Randy Johnson. But that's only me. Please bear in mind that I also took 1st-year starter Brady against MVP Kurt Warner, Washington and Minnesota reject B. Johnson over MVP Gannon, and didn't take NE over Carolina despite Brady's edge over Delhomme.

Pittsburgh (the last team to lead the league in scoring and total yards defense and be a post-season dog was Tampa Bay against Oakland) a

nd New England are the only potential great defenses I see so I am waiting for the Super Bowl to bet the AFC.

There's no reason to risk money in the AFC championship.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
18
Tokens
Confidence factor

Deb i enjoyed your analysis I disagree on confidence momentum factor.
I'll get to the point with two old axioms: "What have you done for me lately? " and "Your only as good as your last show"
The Pats just shutdown the most prolific Passer in NFL history. The Steelers are in the championship due to someone elses misfortune (two missed field goals by Brien.
Pats should be feeling pretty good about themselves the Steelers??
I predict a close game with Corey Dillons running securing victory for Pats. 24-20.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
283
Tokens
Deb i enjoyed your analysis I disagree on confidence momentum factor.
I'll get to the point with two old axioms: "What have you done for me lately? " and "Your only as good as your last show"

The Pats just shutdown the most prolific Passer in NFL history. The Steelers are in the championship due to someone elses misfortune (two missed field goals by Brien.
Pats should be feeling pretty good about themselves the Steelers??
I predict a close game with Corey Dillons running securing victory for Pats. 24-20.

Hello Da_Edge..

I just finished responding to this same question in another thread and for the sake of not having to re-write the same answer over again I am going to simply re-post my same reply as my reply addresses the same issues..

take care and thanks!

Deb


You are entirely correct of course about Pittsburgh nearly being bounced from the playoffs by the Jets, however, Pittsburgh did in fact live to fight another day which in my opinion might just make them this years "Team of Destiny".

Every year there appears to be a team that simply defies the odds and comes out of nowhere, last season Green Bay entered the playoffs with a 10-6 record and after being very lucky to get by Seattle 33-27 in the Wildcard round looked to possibly be this team, however, we found out when McNabb completed a desperation pass on a 4th and 26 and brought Philly back to win 20-17 that GB in fact was not this "Team of Destiny" to make the Super Bowl.

Last years NFC team of Destiny turned out to be the 11-5 Carolina Panthers who had won 10 of 11 games by seven points or less, after disposing of Dallas in the Wildcard round the Panthers traveled to St Louis and defeated the lambs 29-23 in overtime as 7 point dogs.

Because Philly was playing at home and was also playing in their 3rd straight NFC Championship game the pundits in the media hammered the point home that this was the Eagles year to make it to the big game, the public agreed and wagered mostly on the Eagles who closed as 4 point favorites over Carolina.

The public ignored the fact that the Eagles had lost RB Brian Westbrook to injury and also ignored the fact that the Panthers had the much better defense, the end result was a 14-3 upset win for the Panthers which sent the Cinderella Carolina Panthers to the SB even tho' the same Panthers had been a 7-9 team the year prior.

We all know what happened next as the Panthers were then installed as 7 point Super Bowl dogs to the patritots and put on one heck of a fight before losing 32-29.

In 2002 the "Team of Destiny" turned out to be the Tampa Bucs who unlike the 2003 Panthers closed out the deal by defeating Super Bowl favorite Oakland 48-21...Tampa had posted a regular season record of 9-7 in 2001 and got crushed 31-9 by Philly in their opening playoff game which led to HC Tony Dungy getting fired and first year HC Jon Gruden taking the helm.

Jon Gruden took over the Tampa Bucs and led them to a regular season record of 12-4, the Bucs faced an Eagle team in the Conference Championship that also posted a regular season mark of 12-4, although Tampa's defense had been the first defense since the 1985 Chicago Bears to lead the league in both points allowed and yards allowed in the same season the Bucs were installed as 4 point dogs....the result was a Tampa 27-10 win and cover.

In 2001 the "Team of Destiny" turned out to be the patriots, the patriots had only finished 5-11 in 2000 and no one but possibly the biggest pat fan would have thought they would win the Super Bowl the next year...but they did.

The pats finsihed the 2001 regular season with a 11-5 record which was good enough to get them a first round bye in the playoffs after finishing the regular season by winning 8 of their final 9 games, in the Conference semi's warm weather Oakland had to travel to Foxboro and play in near blizzard conditions which of course benefited the pats.

In that game against the Raiders, patriot QB Tom Brady fumbled the ball to Oakland after he was hit by CB Charles Woodson, if the play stood the Raiders had the upper hand on the scoreboard and probably would have won the game and advanced to the AFC Championship game, as it was the referees came back with a ruling that Brady did not fumble the ball because of the "Tuck Rule".....the rest is history as the pats ended up winning 16-13.

The week following, the patriots traveled to Pittsburgh and were installed as 8.5 point dogs, the public's perception of new england was that they had "Lucked out" in defeating Oakland the previous week, this led to the line closing with the patriots as 10 point dogs.

The patriots defeated Pittsburgh 24-17 but needed a blocked FG attempt that went for a TD and a punt return that went for another TD to seal the upset, the patriots completed their "Team of Destiny" run by moving on to the 2001 Super Bowl as 14 point betting dogs and knocking out the lambs by the final of 20-17.

In 2000 the "Team of Destiny" was the Baltimore Ravens who ended up winning the Super Bowl with one the best defense's to ever play and a Tampa castoff QB named Trent Dilfer under center.

In 1999 the "Team of Destiny" turned out to be the St Louis Rams who were being led into battle by a former stock boy named Kurt Warner.

The 1998 and 1997 "Teams of Destiny" turned out to be non other than the John Elway led Denver Bronco's, the roast was in the oven and the table was set...one of the greatest QB's to ever play the game retired after winning two straight Super Bowls after losing his first three trips to the big show.

The point I am trying to make here is that each and every year there appears to be a "Team of Destiny", a team that for one reason or another somehow someway defied the odds.....or did these teams in question really defy the odds?

Other than the Denver Bronco's with John Elway, in virtually every case the "Team of Destiny" did not have an established QB under center and in most cases the "Team of Destiny" came out of nowhere, patriot Tom Brady took over for an injured Drew Bledsoe and won it all in 2001 but the following year in 2002 was a down year for the patriots who finished 9-7 and failed to even make the playoffs.

Hence, the speculation entering the 2003 playoffs that Bradys Super Bowl win might have been a fluke, it should be pointed out that the patriots were 8.5 home favorites in their opening 2003 playoff home game against Tenn but escaped with a 17-14 win before continuing on to win their second Super Bowl win in three years.

I believe Pittsburgh is this years "Team of Destiny", yes its true that they have a rookie QB under center and yes its true that they had a bad season last year, however, this Steeler team is essentially the 2001 patriots with regard to having had a bad season the year prior and thus came out of nowhere.

This Steeler team is also similar to the 2001 patriots in that the pats lost starting QB Drew Bledsoe early in the year to injury which forced the pats to go with little known backup QB Tom Brady, by the time Bledsoe was well enough to play again it was too late to get his job back because Brady was winning each start.

The exact same thing happened to Pittsburgh this season when starting QB Tommy Maddox when down with an elbow injury in week two, in steps unknown rookie QB Ben Roethlisberger, by the time Maddox was healthy enough to play again it also was too late because all Roethlisberger did was go undefeated the rest of the way.

This is also the exact same thing that happened to the St Louis Rams when they won the 1999 Super Bowl, starting QB Trent Green was injured in the final preseason game of the year, the lambs were forced to go with unknown backup QB Kurt Warner.

Just some thoughts....take care and good luck!!

Deb<!-- / message -->
 

New member
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
283
Tokens
Deb

Thanks for your time and effort, I too like the Steelers. I am also looking at U35 for the game.

Blue Raider
<!-- / message -->


Hello Blue Raider..

Thank you for your kind words, with regard to the total on the game...I believe this contest will go OVER 35, the opening O/U number was 37 or 37.5 depending on where you looked, because of weather concerns the public has elected to pound the number downwards to its current mark of 35.

Personally I believe each team in this matchup will take their shots downfield in an attempt to loosen up the opposing defense with regard to getting the play action working.

I think Pittsburgh has the advantage in the passing game with WR's Plaxico Burress, Hines Ward, and Randle El, not to mention having having pass catching TE Tuman and RB Staley out of the backfield, however, pat QB Tom Brady also has his weapons which leads me to believe a higher than expected final score total is what we will see....I project a Pittsburgh 23-16 win and cover with the total going OVER.

take care and good luck!

Deb
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,901
Messages
13,561,167
Members
100,705
Latest member
fun88linkmobi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com