I am "not scared of anyone". I am being practical. There is an extremely high likelihood that people immigrating from any of these seven countries will commit terrorist acts if they are admitted. I am not going to allow the UN to vet these people. I don't trust them. Further, we need a BAN on any immigrant receiving welfare if they are admitted to the US. Why is it that over 70% of muslim immigrants are on welfare? Is it a cultural thing? That is like strip searching granny who is knitting a blanket at the airport and not being allowed to profile muslims.
It is time to get back to common sense, something that has been lost in this country both under Obama and with the increasingly politicized judiciary. There is nothing unconstitutional about protecting our borders and keeping the citizens of this country safe from recognized threats.
hno:
Funny, when this happened, you said not 1 word about "fear" and "people looking different"
Want to guess why?
WASHINGTON—The United States today began implementing changes under the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 (the Act). U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) welcomes more than a million passengers arriving to the United States every day and is committed to facilitating legitimate travel while maintaining the highest standards of security and border protection. Under the Act, travelers in the following categories are no longer eligible to travel or be admitted to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP):
- Nationals of VWP countries who have traveled to or been present in Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria on or after March 1, 2011 (with limited exceptions for travel for diplomatic or military purposes in the service of a VWP country).
- Nationals of VWP countries who are also nationals of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria.
You are such a silly hypocrite it is kind of sad. You're a 70 year old man screeching about legal topics you are wholly ignorant on at 1:30 am on a gambling forum.
Funny, I don't remember libtards getting their panties in a wad when Obama was singing Trump's song: https://www.facebook.com/fredforusa/videos/10209985470767479/
White House Rewriting Trump’s Controversial Travel Ban Order: Sources
Trump's legal team still believes it will be eventually proven correct on the merits of the current executive order, the official said. And they are looking into several options, including continuing the court battle as well as signing a new immigration EO "very soon."
Several sources close to President Trump told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough that White House lawyers and working on language for the executive order that would be able to find favor with the federal courts.
Trump's legal team still believes it will be eventually proven correct on the merits of the current executive order, the official said. And they are looking into several options, including continuing the court battle as well as signing a new immigration EO "very soon."
Several sources close to President Trump told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough that White House lawyers and working on language for the executive order that would be able to find favor with the federal courts.
I heard this too. A quick fix will make it constitutional.
Regardless, that leftist court's decision would have been overturned by the Supreme Court (as their activist decisions have been before multiple times)
<header class="articleheader"> [h=1]Turley: Trump Making Same Arguments as Obama in Defense of Immigration Executive Order[/h] 469
3
<figure class="figurearticlefeatured">
Turley: Trump Making Same Arguments as Obama in Defense of Immigration Executive Order
Breitbart
</figure> by Jeff Poor9 Feb 20172,477
</header> SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
<form method="post" action="/newsletter-signup/">
</form>
<form method="post" action="/newsletter-signup/"></form>
Thursday on MSNBC’s “The 11th Hour,” George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley reacted to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision to uphold a stay by a lower to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration to the United States from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
Although the court ruled in the opponents of the Trump order’s favor, the law still was on Trump’s side and that the Trump administration was using the “virtually the identical arguments” the Obama administration had used in defense of its immigration policy.
“Well, it was a poorly crafted executive order, and it was a terrible rollout,” Turley said. “But I still think that the law favors the administration once you get to the merits. I don’t agree with many of those, some of those cases. But the courts have been highly deferential to the president, and they generally don’t second-guess. I think the people also have to acknowledge that the Trump administration here is making virtually the identical argument to the Obama administration.”
“The Obama administration argued the president’s judgment on administration was largely unreviewable,” he continued. “He argued that he could even refuse or order the failure to enforce immigration laws. But the arguments were very, very similar. And for all the Democrats objecting now, I didn’t hear a peep of objection from them when just last year these arguments were being made by the same Justice Department.”
<header class="articleheader"> [h=1]Turley: Trump Making Same Arguments as Obama in Defense of Immigration Executive Order[/h] 469
3
<figure class="figurearticlefeatured">
Breitbart
</figure> by Jeff Poor9 Feb 20172,477
</header> SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
<form method="post" action="/newsletter-signup/">
- <input name="input_1" value="" placeholder="email address" type="text">
</form>
<form method="post" action="/newsletter-signup/"></form>
Thursday on MSNBC’s “The 11th Hour,” George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley reacted to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision to uphold a stay by a lower to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration to the United States from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
Although the court ruled in the opponents of the Trump order’s favor, the law still was on Trump’s side and that the Trump administration was using the “virtually the identical arguments” the Obama administration had used in defense of its immigration policy.
“Well, it was a poorly crafted executive order, and it was a terrible rollout,” Turley said. “But I still think that the law favors the administration once you get to the merits. I don’t agree with many of those, some of those cases. But the courts have been highly deferential to the president, and they generally don’t second-guess. I think the people also have to acknowledge that the Trump administration here is making virtually the identical argument to the Obama administration.”
“The Obama administration argued the president’s judgment on administration was largely unreviewable,” he continued. “He argued that he could even refuse or order the failure to enforce immigration laws. But the arguments were very, very similar. And for all the Democrats objecting now, I didn’t hear a peep of objection from them when just last year these arguments were being made by the same Justice Department.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed that Flynn spoke by phone with Russia's Washington ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, but said reports that they had discussed sanctions were "wrong."
