Consensus numbers across the board

[letsgohoosiers]

BTW I should say, this isn't something that is exclusive to a couple books or a "system", if you look across the board and notice that every single book has +115 or near that number on a certain team, bet the other way. I simply took the 3 books that are known as "professional" books because of how much action they got.

I'd say that any time Matchbook has a significantly better line than the rest of the books, bet on that team. They don't discourage betting on any side throwing out bad lines, rather they always give a .01 line that shows the market value of the game.

 

[roc18]

Thanks for thie info

 

[tb06]

line reading 101... thanks for the info, bud... you must do very well in this biz

 

[marcopolo84]

On the sbrodds.com site, just wondering if there was a way to look into the past so i can take some history on this betting style? thanks

 

[RDC-3]

On the sbrodds.com site, just wondering if there was a way to look into the past so i can take some history on this betting style? thanks

this should work............
http://www.sbrforum.com/Scores/MLB+Odds/20090630.aspx

 

[RDC-3]

just wanna make sure im doing this right but the Angels would be a play right now wouldnt they?

 

[tb06]

SBR is showing that the second of the 2 LAA games would be a play, but that's pretty irrelevant right now, as we are to wait only minutes before game time to review the lines instead of hours

 

[RDC-3]

SBR is showing that the second of the 2 LAA games would be a play, but that's pretty irrelevant right now, as we are to wait only minutes before game time to review the lines instead of hours

i get that>>>was just wondering if i was looking at it correctly for an example...thanks

 

[pistol495]

I am seeing LAA in both if I am reading it correctly using the $0.01 line on Matchbook.
I think they're showing a lot of plays off Matchbook.

 

[roc18]

5:00PM play would be
LA Angels (52-38) at Kansas City (37-54) LA Angels 1st game

 

[tb06]

5:00PM play would be
LA Angels (52-38) at Kansas City (37-54) LA Angels 1st game

it's only showing a .03 separation right now

 

[ZJP6050]

angels, according to the market. already called it in earlier! gl all

 

[LetsGetPaid]

Do you guys factor in BetJam? they got it at +125 and Bookmaker +119. Close enough for me anyways

 

[marcopolo84]

looks good, thanks guys.

 

[sparticus]

2 mis before gametime= angels

 

[tb06]

Let's get 'em boys! :toast:

 

[marcopolo84]

I've been seeing some good paterns in the runlines too. I think LA -1.5 +120 is a good play too.

 

[letsgohoosiers]

I love L.A.

We love it!

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_lpxPUbn8y8&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_lpxPUbn8y8&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

 

[focker]

yes sir......and Matchbook has the best line by .03-.08 cents

Thanks LGH @)

 

[K NON]

love laa, whats everyone liking tonight