Consensus numbers across the board

[letsgohoosiers]

This is what I had
7/21/09
LA Angels (52-38) at Kansas City (37-54) LA Angels -142 W

NY Mets (43-48) at Washington (26-65) NY Mets +126 L

Seattle (49-43) at Detroit (48-42) Seattle +148 L

Cleveland (36-57) at Toronto (46-47) Cleveland -120 (No Play) W

Tampa Bay (51-42) at Chi. White Sox (48-44) Tampa Bay -130 W

LA Angels (53-38) at Kansas City (37-55) LA Angels -139 W

That's correct.

I'm guessing you're not going to play dogs anymore? :lol:

 

[marcopolo84]

This is what I had
7/21/09
LA Angels (52-38) at Kansas City (37-54) LA Angels -142 W

NY Mets (43-48) at Washington (26-65) NY Mets +126 L

Seattle (49-43) at Detroit (48-42) Seattle +148 L

Cleveland (36-57) at Toronto (46-47) Cleveland -120 (No Play) W

Tampa Bay (51-42) at Chi. White Sox (48-44) Tampa Bay -130 W

LA Angels (53-38) at Kansas City (37-55) LA Angels -139 W

Look at the cleveland one again, i have it as a play "+100, -101, -105

And no more dogs. lol

 

[roc18]

That's correct.

I'm guessing you're not going to play dogs anymore? :lol:

No lol, the dogs are bound to win eventually. But teams that have lines that are -200 or more are on an 18-0 run though.


And marco I wrote no play because I had toronto initially and Cleveland became a play like 1 minute before the game started.

 

[letsgohoosiers]

Look at the cleveland one again, i have it as a play "+100, -101, -105

And no more dogs. lol

I think he wrote "no play" indicating that he didn't play it. I'm probably wrong though.

 

[marcopolo84]

got ya, thanks for clearing that up

 

[focker]

hey LGH.....who did you have on the RLM tonight???

I use 5 dimes as opener and movement, and see that NATs, ATL and OAK were plays, but then cross referened to the Pro books and only ATL was a play.....

think i may stick to 5 dimes, as i believe that is where the % on sbrodds comes from.....

thanks in advance

 

[letsgohoosiers]

I only use 5Dimes and only look at SBROdds for RLM. No other site other than SBROdds and no other book other than 5Dimes shows accurate RLM.

SportsInsights and other percentage tracking sites use a variety of books to create their percentages, and the betting percentages don't correlate towards that book's line movement.

The plays I had for RLM on 5Dimes were Houston, Atlanta, Washington, and Oakland.

 

[focker]

alright great......yea that is what i was using also, then started checking other books and making it more dificult than it should be.....d1g1t:

so i take it if ther is a consensus play and a RLM play on 2 different teams in the same game the RLM team becomes the play? (ie NATs)

nice day on your RLM games :toast:

 

[letsgohoosiers]

so i take it if ther is a consensus play and a RLM play on 2 different teams in the same game the RLM team becomes the play? (ie NATs)

That is what I've been doing.

 

[sparticus]

I have seen this work real well in foots & hoops also, meaning the RLM's,gl

 

[RDC-3]

I have seen this work real well in foots & hoops also, meaning the RLM's,gl

does it work the same in foots and hoops >>>>>by just playing the faves?

 

[roc18]

1 early play
Milwaukee (48-46) at Pittsburgh (41-52) Milwaukee

 

[jackcurrency]

Milwaukee is the play

 

[Club]

I haven't had the time to follow this sytem, but I'll say that I'm trying to play this Oak/Min under and Matchbook is only 2 cents better than The Greek (my only two books), which is very rare.

 

[jackcurrency]

Chicago CUB is a play

 

[ionicking]

How?

How are the cubs a play? Between Pinnacle and thegreek it is a .08 difference. Please explain.

 

[Everybodystinks]

Yanks are a play.

 

[Everybodystinks]

Now the Cubs are a play.

 

[ray]

Cubs and Yanks is a play as of 1pm

 

[roc18]

1:00 Games
Baltimore (41-52) at NY Yankees (56-37) NY Yankees

Chi. Cubs (47-45) at Philadelphia (53-38) Chi. Cubs