congrats. Tom Brady. greatest QB of all time

Search

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
there is no one best QB all time. Its not an individual sport. He's a great QB for sure. Among the best ever no doubt.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,608
Tokens

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,608
Tokens
there is no one best QB all time. Its not an individual sport. He's a great QB for sure. Among the best ever no doubt.

Sports is about the rings.....He has 4....PERIOD!

He moves ahead of Joe as the best ever at this point....No doubt.....Love em or hate em.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Thrown the most TD passes in SB history.Most play off wins in history. Jesus Christmas I hope the Manning Brady debate is over at least.....it was over 10 years ago.some of you fuck are just waking up to that fact.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
There would be no debate if Wilson hands off to Lynch.....Wilson would have been in the conversation as being better than Brady with back to back Super Bowls.....

Petey just made Brady's legacy.....
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
Sports is about the rings.....He has 4....PERIOD!

He moves ahead of Joe as the best ever at this point....No doubt.....Love em or hate em.
Montana and Bradshaw have 4 rings also, so why does Brady automatically move ahead of them if you basing it solely on number of rings?
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,608
Tokens
Montana and Bradshaw have 4 rings also, so why does Brady automatically move ahead of them if you basing it solely on number of rings?

The overall body of work.....I take nothing away from Joe and Bradshaw.

Brady been their 6 times....Got beat on 2 fluke plays.

I give Tom the edge over Joe with Terry 3rd.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,989
Tokens
There would be no debate if Wilson hands off to Lynch.....Wilson would have been in the conversation as being better than Brady with back to back Super Bowls.....

Petey just made Brady's legacy.....

It works both ways. If not for two fluke plays by the Giants Brady would have two more rings, your Boston hatred is again clouding your thinking.
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
Sports is about the rings.....He has 4....PERIOD!

He moves ahead of Joe as the best ever at this point....No doubt.....Love em or hate em.
nope I disagree 100%.

he has 1 imo. 3 are tainted because they cheated, were caught, fined and lost draft picks. But lets not get into that.

Fran Tarkington has 0 rings, Jim Kelley 0 rings and Dan Marino 0 rings. Surely you aren't saying Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams or Mark Rypien were better QB's? Or they are as good as Brett Favre who only has 1 ring. Because based on what you said, you are saying that.

I would agree its about rings if you wanna discuss greatest TEAMS of all time however. Even then, you could bring up eras and all that.

Not trying to rain on the parade here but like I have always said, NO QB wins the game himself. Last I checked, there were 10 others on the field at any given time and another 11 on defense. He could have and you could say should have lost tonight but for a great defensive play by a rookie on his defense/bad offensive play by Seattle.

There is no BEST QG all time. There are some great QB's that have played the game and Brady's name shouldbe mentioned . but he isnt the greatest.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,608
Tokens
nope I disagree 100%.

he has 1 imo. 3 are tainted because they cheated, were caught, fined and lost draft picks. But lets not get into that.

Fran Tarkington has 0 rings, Jim Kelley 0 rings and Dan Marino 0 rings. Surely you aren't saying Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams or Mark Rypien were better QB's? Or they are as good as Brett Favre who only has 1 ring. Because based on what you said, you are saying that.

I would agree its about rings if you wanna discuss greatest TEAMS of all time however. You can still even then, bring up eras and all that.

Not trying to rain on the parade here but like I have always said, NO QB wins the game himself. Last I checked, there were 10 others on the field at any given time and another 11 on defense. He could have and you could say should have lost tonight but for a great defensive play by a rookie on his defense/bad offensive play by Seattle.

There is no BEST QG all time. There are some great QB's that have played the game and Brady's name should me mentioned when you discuss that but he isnt the greatest.

Rings don`t lie 4.......Tom Terrific.....Have a good week!
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
8,229
Tokens
nope I disagree 100%.

he has 1 imo. 3 are tainted because they cheated, were caught, fined and lost draft picks. But lets not get into that.

Fran Tarkington has 0 rings, Jim Kelley 0 rings and Dan Marino 0 rings. Surely you aren't saying Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams or Mark Rypien were better QB's? Or they are as good as Brett Favre who only has 1 ring.

I would agree its about rings if you wanna discuss greatest TEAMS of all time. You can still even then, bring up eras and all that.

Not trying to rain on the parade here but like I have always said, NO QB wins the game himself. Last I checked, there were 10 others on the field at any given time and another 11 on defense. He could have and you could say should have lost tonight but for a great defensive play by a rookie on his defense/bad offensive play by Seattle.

There is no BEST QG all time. There are some great QB's that have played the game and Brady's name should me mentioned when you discuss that but he isnt the greatest.

By your logic elway has zero, so does steve young. Both teams were fined and Denver was also docked draft picks twice for circumventing cap when they won rings. And the 'cheating' u refer to.. The rule they violated in 07 wasn't even a rule when they won their first 3.

Carry on with the hate.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
The overall body of work.....I take nothing away from Joe and Bradshaw.

Brady been their 6 times....Got beat on 2 fluke plays.

I give Tom the edge over Joe with Terry 3rd.
Well, that's not what your original post said which is why I questioned it. And I don't necessarily disagree with you but please stop with the got beat on 2 fluke plays. I get so tired of hearing that crap. NE had their chances to beat the Giants in both those games and did not. Giants were the better team both times.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,608
Tokens
Well, that's not what your original post said which is why I questioned it. And I don't necessarily disagree with you but please stop with the got beat on 2 fluke plays. I get so tired of hearing that crap. NE had their chances to beat the Giants in both those games and did not. Giants were the better team both times.

4 rings.....Been their 6 times so i give him the edge over Joe and Terry.

Now,if Tom didn`t win tonight.....I would still have Joe ahead of Tom.

Because in my lifetime.....Tom Brady and Joe Montana are the best QB`s i have ever seen.....And this is coming from a Giants fan.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,329
Tokens
The overall body of work.....I take nothing away from Joe and Bradshaw.

Brady been their 6 times....Got beat on 2 fluke plays.

I give Tom the edge over Joe with Terry 3rd.

Always going with the 2 fluke plays theory aka revisionist history. One of the Patriots own leaders on those teams has come out & said the Giants deserved to win as they were the better team. His word holds a lot more weight actually having played in the game versus a biased fan. Get over it.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
It works both ways. If not for two fluke plays by the Giants Brady would have two more rings, your Boston hatred is again clouding your thinking.

Just wish I could have seen your face when Seattle got lucky to get inside the ten and then Belicheat not calling timeout when he was supposed to....Congrats, you won a Super Bowl that everyone knew that Lynch was going to get in....
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,447
Tokens
Bob Horry top 5 basketball players ever as well… this the logic by pats fans
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Well as ante Samuel would have done it for him 7 years ago if he would hung on to an easy pick.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
4 rings.....Been their 6 times so i give him the edge over Joe and Terry.

Now,if Tom didn`t win tonight.....I would still have Joe ahead of Tom.

Because in my lifetime.....Tom Brady and Joe Montana are the best QB`s i have ever seen.....And this is coming from a Giants fan.
I don't disagree that Brady and Montana are two of the best, if not the two best I've seen in my lifetime also. I would probably still put Joe slightly ahead of Tom though. And I am also a Giants fan. Been one for 50 years.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
89,608
Tokens
Also,he`s 37 years old.....Take that into account.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,824
Messages
13,560,029
Members
100,691
Latest member
ybb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com