Ah, welcome to this argument again! Unlike the last thread I started however, I got to watch this gm in its entirety (my GOY). One big reason I liked the NYG so much here was Campbell. Sure, he's serviceable, but that's just the problem. He can not lead this team to victory when the run gm shuts down, or the "D" has trouble. And isn't that what you want from your QB? There wasn't much dropped passes, in fact Eli had to suffer way more of that today than Campbell (Eli's INT was a ball that went right thru WR's hands). Speaking of INT's, my god, how lucky is Campbell to have only 1 today? NYG dropped 3 would-be INT's, and had another called back due to a terrible defensive penalty. So Campbell may have had 5 picks. And I heard the argument brought up that WAS is not blocking for him. With NYG focusing more on the run today, I felt Campbell had really good time to pass. There wasn't a lot of batted balls, or hurries, and NY got 2 of their 4 sacks in the 4th when the gm was pretty much done. Anyway, to only give up 4 sacks to the Giants is impressive for a "has-been" oline.
The main pt here is Campbell by no means was the reason WAS lost today. But he sure isn't helping them win either. This sucks for WAS fans because there's 2 very able, passing QB's on the bench.
Difference between run blocking and pass blocking-look it up
Hey slow Campbell backers.Ah, welcome to this argument again! Unlike the last thread I started however, I got to watch this gm in its entirety (my GOY). One big reason I liked the NYG so much here was Campbell. Sure, he's serviceable, but that's just the problem. He can not lead this team to victory when the run gm shuts down, or the "D" has trouble. And isn't that what you want from your QB? There wasn't much dropped passes, in fact Eli had to suffer way more of that today than Campbell (Eli's INT was a ball that went right thru WR's hands). Speaking of INT's, my god, how lucky is Campbell to have only 1 today? NYG dropped 3 would-be INT's, and had another called back due to a terrible defensive penalty. So Campbell may have had 5 picks. And I heard the argument brought up that WAS is not blocking for him. With NYG focusing more on the run today, I felt Campbell had really good time to pass. There wasn't a lot of batted balls, or hurries, and NY got 2 of their 4 sacks in the 4th when the gm was pretty much done. Anyway, to only give up 4 sacks to the Giants is impressive for a "has-been" oline.
The main pt here is Campbell by no means was the reason WAS lost today. But he sure isn't helping them win either. This sucks for WAS fans because there's 2 very able, passing QB's on the bench.
Well of course with their record they are not going to do that, but I think the point of what is trying to be said is.....time to move on here soon. You don't agree?[/b]Those quarter backs on the bench are not NFL QBs. Why do you think no one gave a contract offer to Todd Collins after going 4-0? Could it be he was a product of Al Saunders sysetm and when asked to win a game vs Seattle in the playoffs-he threw interceptions galore. Colt Brennan really? Able? We've seen him in college and pre-season as a 3rd stringer but lets throw him in there.
[/b]Those quarter backs on the bench are not NFL QBs. Why do you think no one gave a contract offer to Todd Collins after going 4-0? Could it be he was a product of Al Saunders sysetm and when asked to win a game vs Seattle in the playoffs-he threw interceptions galore. Colt Brennan really? Able? We've seen him in college and pre-season as a 3rd stringer but lets throw him in there. :nohead:
[/B]Those quarter backs on the bench are not NFL QBs. Why do you think no one gave a contract offer to Todd Collins after going 4-0? Could it be he was a product of Al Saunders sysetm and when asked to win a game vs Seattle in the playoffs-he threw interceptions galore. Colt Brennan really? Able? We've seen him in college and pre-season as a 3rd stringer but lets throw him in there. :nohead:
I think you can say Brennan isn't an NFL QB, but quite unfair to say the same about Collins. He is a career backup, but a winning one. He also led game winning drives for WAS in that win streak. He definitely stunk it up @ SEA, but at that time, SEA's "D" was fearsome @ home. Brennan would definitely throw some picks too, but I tell you, I'd much rather have Colt or Todd if I was down a TD, with 2 min left in gm.
Campbell beat Dallas and Philly this year.
Colt Brennan is going to be a star in this league, but the Skins will probably sleep on him for too long. Campbell is NOT the answer.
Campbell beat them... really?
It didn't have anything to do with 2 dallas turnovers
145 yards from portis
and 128 yards from portis
Campbell is a game manager, and the redskins aren't good enough to win a sb with simply a game manager. Especially in the east with Eli, Romo and Mcnabb.
that fact remains that jason campbell is not the answer!! maybe Colt can be or can't but I know that at a certain point you need to stop babying Campbell! Redskins will be better off without Campbell....
well campbell certainly isnt the future of the skins in my opinion but in fairness he has had to learn a new offense for about 5 or 6 straight seasons now. the guy holds the ball way too long and doesnt try to get it down field. i expect the redskins to go after mcnabb or cassel in the off season.