"Chemical Ali" Dead

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A comprehensive study of the 2000 presidential election in Florida suggests that if the U.S. Supreme Court had allowed a statewide vote recount to proceed, Republican candidate George W. Bush would still have been elected president.

The National Opinion Research Center (NORC) at the University of Chicago conducted the six-month study for a consortium of eight news media companies, including CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/florida.ballots/stories/main.html

 

[kayaman+]

Actually I don't think you think,

I said I don't want to hear it because it's not relevant!
I talking about the public not being able to cast their votes, people being turned away from the polls and denied their legal right to vote. Votes were dicarded because of faulty machinery. It doesn't matter how many times you count the votes if you don't have all of them!

Jumping Jesus on a pogo stick!!!!! You are definately a waste of time frank.

 

> said I don't want to here it because it's not relivant!

Not relevant to your agenda...

>public not being able to cast their votes

Give *one* name of just one person.

 

kaya man, some more stuff you wont like...

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Problems with ballots, equipment, voter registration and polling places are to blame for the 4 million to 6 million uncounted votes in the last presidential election... Although the study was born in the wake of the Florida recounts, it finds that the voting and vote-counting problems in Florida were not the worst in the country. Illinois, South Carolina, Idaho, Wyoming and Georgia all had higher rates of spoiled, unmarked or uncounted ballots in the 2000 presidential election. Some cities, including Chicago and New York, had rates of unmarked, uncounted and spoiled ballots well in excess of the state of Florida.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/07/16/voting.problems/

 

[kayaman+]

No Frank

God you are thick-headed.

Not relevant to our discussion. The vote didn't reflect the state because people were denied their right to vote. What don't you understand about that?

 

>people were denied their right to vote

How so...?

There is no perfect voting system but as you can see by the above post Fl was not the worse.

 

guys this thread is supposed to be about chemical ali. has anyone heard the latest? imo, until we have his body then we can't be sure that he's dead. these guys have body doubles, etc...very elusive

 

[grantt]

Fat Frank if you only read one book this year make it Stupid White Men. It's a #1 best seller and it explains everything.

 

You're dead wrong about Bush being elected. Even Clintoons front man Terry M (head of the DNC admits Bush won). The leftest floated this lie for future elections. The dems set up hearings to allow these people that were so called wronged and no one showed up, not one person. After the election the DNC hired telemarketers to call known dems and in an effort to rally people up to say they voted wrong and they weren't allow to vote. The selected not elected is total and complete BULLSHIT. Every recount shows Bush won, if not every leftest media outlet would show the results that Gore won. Wake up.

As for the doom and gloomers, they said the US is bogged down and we'd lose the war, 1000's soldiers would die taking Baghdad so lets just pull out now. If we go in Saddam will use chemical weapons on us so we can't, but Saddam doesn't have chemical weapons. WHICH IS IT YOU LEFTEST!!!!!!!!!! Does he have them or not??

 

how do u guys turn a thread about Chemical Ali into a discussion about Clinton?