Youre the guy carrying on bud!
Youre the one who posted that my record was a loser between weeks 2-9 and ASKED WHY is wasn't posted because you wanted to tell the forum it was a losing record, when it was just the opposite! .
When its at 60% and up +++5,800.00$$$ Thats called carrying on.
You NOW say, after you were crushed by my record, that you dont care about my "record" but you always made sure to talk and post about it?
Thats called carrying on.
Youre the guy who jumped on the Big Lou-ser bandwagon "Challenge" and instigated in this thread.. Thats called carrying on.
Youre the guy who dropped into nearly all of my threads with "Likes" when I would lose a game. - Thats called carrying on.
Youre such an asshole - that when you lie and get exposed for it - you cant be man enough and admit it. Thats because you "Carry On" like a pussie.
Now after your PR ratings myth has collapsed - you are preaching a new angle with "Betting Market Derived Spreads" - Bullshit ..
Then you make a remark to me, like your some super smart capper and tell me to learn something?...LOL
Lines arent made by starting with assumed "Neutral site" games bud. Thats already a bad way to start your made-up numbers for value...
So your hypothesis is starting with no real standard because youre starting point is already unbalanced.
You've already Dismissed the facts and created a "neutral site theory" which is unfavorable to both the better teams and worse teams.
Just like how every year guys make up Power Rantings and starts with a guessed number, at a presumed number, BEFORE the team has played any games - then claim to adjust as the season goes. LOL
If your starting point is imagined - then NONE of the adjustments to follow matter, because they are tuned from a bad PR number from the start.
Now if YOU want to learn something - try figuring out what that means. I doubt you can.
Thats why you had no answer in your thread of 'Power Ratings' for all the categories I listed in it for you!
Now - YOU can - Carry On!