1st off - annalise is GORGEOUS!
as for sung hi lee - pic #12 is my fave of her - although i know there is an even better one of her like that. i have met her a few times in person. she is somewhat of a cunt in "real life" and wore a LOT of makeup. i'd still fuuuck her - but when i plastered my load all over her face i'd leave soon after.
as for sung hi lee - pic #12 is my fave of her - although i know there is an even better one of her like that. i have met her a few times in person. she is somewhat of a cunt in "real life" and wore a LOT of makeup. i'd still fuuuck her - but when i plastered my load all over her face i'd leave soon after.
asia has a great body. but that large ass tattoo on her front side is hideous and a huge distraction. also - i am a rabid anti-smoker and anyone who smokes is not for me - so that last pic is enough for me to take a pass on her. the fact her face is nasty doesn't help any, either. i will toss in a few pix sometime soon.
Phaedrus - <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> After being hit by Phaedrus, Uncle Butternuts, Walk of Life, hamneggs, Dante, Journeyman, hungover, and BHB, Asia decides she's had it and deserves a break.
"Eight is enough!" she protests loudly <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That is classic my man!
LMAO
"Eight is enough!" she protests loudly <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That is classic my man!
Phaedrus,
Whilst I can only compliment you on your staying power in the matter of posting pretty pictures of skinny birds without their various acoutrements, I have to express a certain disappointment in the way you channel your talents.
If you want to see artistic nudes, then just ask. I have one of the finest collections on the planet.
If you want an educated discussion then start one and we'll follow.
Your talents are wasted in displaying the talentless for the absorbtion of the scatological.
You want scat?
I have .........
Psssst. If you want to see a sports selection then go to the baseball forum and absorb my pick before they transplant it with... transplants.
Whilst I can only compliment you on your staying power in the matter of posting pretty pictures of skinny birds without their various acoutrements, I have to express a certain disappointment in the way you channel your talents.
If you want to see artistic nudes, then just ask. I have one of the finest collections on the planet.
If you want an educated discussion then start one and we'll follow.
Your talents are wasted in displaying the talentless for the absorbtion of the scatological.
You want scat?
I have .........
Psssst. If you want to see a sports selection then go to the baseball forum and absorb my pick before they transplant it with... transplants.
Peter,
THanks for the (sort of) compliment. I also have a vast collection of artistic nudes. What the assorted and sundry folks on the forum seem to enjoy more is celebrity nudes, which I also have a huge collection of -- amusingly enough, up until I started posting them here I hardly ever looked at them; I just accumulate, accumulate, accumulate, like Mary Kate in Cat's Cradle except she had the good sense to accumulate wealth, whereas I am accumulating digitised photographs of naked women.
I posted some really genuinely interesting photos of body-painted women in a thread entitled "The H.I.P. Horoscope." You might look it up; the work on some of them is nothing short of amazing (especially Scorpio, and my own sign , Sagittatius.)
I also think that 'artistic' nudes is somewhat of a thrown around term. You have photographers like Norway's Peter Hegre, who does excellent work, but I am uncertain why it's called "art" aside from the fact that no one's ever heard of the models. I am reminded of the way that all through the 70's and 80's, as the concept of the "supermodel" was born and developed, none of them would ever consider posing nude in a magazine such as [i[Playboy[/i]. Then one day Herb Ritts did an amazing nude layout of Raquel Welch, then another of Sigourney Weaver, then the famous 1988 PLayboy spread of Cindy Crawford, then suddenly it was smut if Bob Guccione wanted it, but *art* if Herb Ritts did. The lines drawn between 'art', 'entertainment' and 'pornography' seem tenuous at best.
Phaedrus
THanks for the (sort of) compliment. I also have a vast collection of artistic nudes. What the assorted and sundry folks on the forum seem to enjoy more is celebrity nudes, which I also have a huge collection of -- amusingly enough, up until I started posting them here I hardly ever looked at them; I just accumulate, accumulate, accumulate, like Mary Kate in Cat's Cradle except she had the good sense to accumulate wealth, whereas I am accumulating digitised photographs of naked women.
I posted some really genuinely interesting photos of body-painted women in a thread entitled "The H.I.P. Horoscope." You might look it up; the work on some of them is nothing short of amazing (especially Scorpio, and my own sign , Sagittatius.)
I also think that 'artistic' nudes is somewhat of a thrown around term. You have photographers like Norway's Peter Hegre, who does excellent work, but I am uncertain why it's called "art" aside from the fact that no one's ever heard of the models. I am reminded of the way that all through the 70's and 80's, as the concept of the "supermodel" was born and developed, none of them would ever consider posing nude in a magazine such as [i[Playboy[/i]. Then one day Herb Ritts did an amazing nude layout of Raquel Welch, then another of Sigourney Weaver, then the famous 1988 PLayboy spread of Cindy Crawford, then suddenly it was smut if Bob Guccione wanted it, but *art* if Herb Ritts did. The lines drawn between 'art', 'entertainment' and 'pornography' seem tenuous at best.
Phaedrus
