Capitalism rears it's ugly head wonce again.

[Acebb]

Ummm 95 percent of the Franklin Center revenue comes from Donors Trust....whose top contributors are the Koch brothers....and the franklin center is the group who created watchdog.org......now i understand you're not brilliant....but even you can see what's going on here i would think.

Uh, hey dummy, 95% of a group's revenue that comes from another group, isn't "funded 95% by the Koch brothers"

You simply will believe any lie rather than address the topic.

Note: despite the article in question being "written by watchdog.org" note that the article isn't on that group's Web site.

Funny that, huh?

 

[vitterd]

Uh, hey dummy, 95% of a group's revenue that comes from another group, isn't "funded 95% by the Koch brothers"

You simply will believe any lie rather than address the topic.

Note: despite the article in question being "written by watchdog.org" note that the article isn't on that group's Web site.

Funny that, huh?

Oh boy.....You don't think a top donor has say in the content of what they org spews out? What planet are you from? It's obvious what this is....every media outlet the koch brothers get their claws in does the same shit.

 

[The Guesser]

So this article was "written by Watchdog.org" yet mysteriously it is not on the site.

Nor is watchdog.org "funded 95% by the Koch brothers"

But hey, what's a few lies when you can't accept facts that are inconvenient?

WTF are you talking about? http://watchdog.org/114137/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare/

 

[The Guesser]

Uh, hey dummy, 95% of a group's revenue that comes from another group, isn't "funded 95% by the Koch brothers"

You simply will believe any lie rather than address the topic.

Note: despite the article in question being "written by watchdog.org" note that the article isn't on that group's Web site.

Funny that, huh?

All we have is the % given. If the despicable Koch Brothers were transparent, we would have a more accurate picture. It might be 100%. The article is on their website, dummy. http://watchdog.org/114137/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare/

 

[Acebb]

WTF are you talking about? http://watchdog.org/114137/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare/

Uh, I'm talking about the Washington Times article you said was written by watchdog.org

You know, the article that started this thread, or are you now going to pretend that wasn't the topic?

 

[Acebb]

All we have is the % given. If the despicable Koch Brothers were transparent, we would have a more accurate picture. It might be 100%. The article is on their website, dummy. http://watchdog.org/114137/top-hospitals-opt-out-of-obamacare/

Laugh out loud funny.

Um, dum-dum, you might want to read the actual article in the 1st post and note that the link you've provided twice has nothing to do with Walmart.

As I said, you've completely beclowned yourself.

 

[Acebb]

Oh boy.....You don't think a top donor has say in the content of what they org spews out? What planet are you from? It's obvious what this is....every media outlet the koch brothers get their claws in does the same shit.

So in other words, in your mind the Koch brothers allegedly provide 95% of the funding to group A (donor's trust) - )NOTE: the assertion is a lie, the Koch brothers do not do any such thing) And somehow, magically, donors trust is able to transfer the entirety of that 95% to group B (franklin center) (Note: this is not possible as donor's trust would go out of business) therefore, again magically, the leftist "fact" that Koch "provides 95% of the funding for watchdog.org" becomes true!

Again, you people will simply believe any lie rather than address the topic.

 

[The Guesser]

Uh, I'm talking about the Washington Times article you said was written by watchdog.org

You know, the article that started this thread, or are you now going to pretend that wasn't the topic?

I never said the Washington Times article was written by watchdog.org??? I was referencing the gist of the article talking about Hospital Coverage. It went to a Watchdog.org article which has been debunked. If you're confused, my apologies.

 

[The Guesser]

So in other words, in your mind the Koch brothers allegedly provide 95% of the funding to group A (donor's trust) - )NOTE: the assertion is a lie, the Koch brothers do not do any such thing) And somehow, magically, donors trust is able to transfer the entirety of that 95% to group B (franklin center) (Note: this is not possible as donor's trust would go out of business) therefore, again magically, the leftist "fact" that Koch "provides 95% of the funding for watchdog.org" becomes true!

Again, you people will simply believe any lie rather than address the topic.

Sorry if you can't follow along. The article said Walmart Care is superior, and one of the main reasons was that it provided extensive Hospital care, as opposed to the ACA. The watchdog article debunked the Hospital care stuff.

 

[Acebb]

So since "guesser" is yet another mentally challenged leftist, let us go slow here.

See the claim "But a Washington Examiner comparison of the two health insurance programs found that Walmart's plan is more affordable and provides significantly better access to high-quality medical care than Obamacare." Comes from, wait for it, the Washington Examiner. Here is the link: http://washingtonexaminer.com/surpr...-more-coverage-than-obamacare/article/2541670

In a fit of beclowning, guesser then suggests that the article, which mind you helpfully said was done by the Washington Times, was "written by watchdog.org" because, well, another dipshit leftist said so. For "proof" of this claim a link to an article that wasn't the topic of the Washington Time examination of the Walmart plan was given.

Conclusion: guesser is either stupid, a liar, or both.

 

[Acebb]

It went to a Watchdog.org article which has been debunked. If you're confused, my apologies.

Except it wasn't "debunked" at all.

That is another lie. Kind of like saying "funded 95% by the Koch Brothers"

 

[The Guesser]

So since "guesser" is yet another mentally challenged leftist, let us go slow here.

See the claim "But a Washington Examiner comparison of the two health insurance programs found that Walmart's plan is more affordable and provides significantly better access to high-quality medical care than Obamacare." Comes from, wait for it, the Washington Examiner. Here is the link: http://washingtonexaminer.com/surpr...-more-coverage-than-obamacare/article/2541670

In a fit of beclowning, guesser then suggests that the article, which mind you helpfully said was done by the Washington Times, was "written by watchdog.org" because, well, another dipshit leftist said so. For "proof" of this claim a link to an article that wasn't the topic of the Washington Time examination of the Walmart plan was given.

Conclusion: guesser is either stupid, a liar, or both.

Idiot. I already explained it and tried to be nice. But since that's impossible with a close minded ideologue loon like you, it was done in vain. You are a liar. I never said the Washington Times article was written by Watchdog.org. Never. That was somehow your assumption, and I was trying to be nice by seeing how you could get to that, but again, it was my mistake to try and be real with a clown like yourself. So carry on with your idiocy.

 

[Acebb]

Idiot. I already explained it and tried to be nice. But since that's impossible with a close minded ideologue loon like you, it was done in vain. You are a liar. I never said the Washington Times article was written by Watchdog.org. Never. .

No, you only posted as a response to an article from the Washington Times the quote of a comment (which you asserted was in response to the article) that asserted "the article" was written by Watchdog.org

 

[The Guesser]

No, you only posted as a response to an article from the Washington Times the quote of a comment (which you asserted was in response to the article) that asserted "the article" was written by Watchdog.org

Those were your assumptions, and you incorrectly tied it together to somehow say I said the Washington Times article was written by watchdog.org, which was and is a blatant lie. You are also trying to deflect from what was said about Hospital Coverage, with an unrelated point. I don't blame you.

 

[Acebb]

Those were your assumptions, and you incorrectly tied it together to somehow say I said the Washington Times article was written by watchdog.org, which was and is a blatant lie. You are also trying to deflect from what was said about Hospital Coverage, with an unrelated point. I don't blame you.

Again, you responded to a Washington Times article with a quote saying it was "the 1st comment" about the article.

And, there is nothing to "deflect" from since the silly liberal liar who was "digging" about hospital coverage posted a blatant lie that "watchdog.org receives 95% of their funding from the Koch Brothers"

See, I don't uncritically accept comments that confirm my biases from anonymous people on the Internet.

You do.

I'll add, your whole little exercise in bringing up Koch and talking about other organizations was a pathetic, troll attempt to not address the fact that ObamaCare doesn't really do much in comparison to what the private sector offers. As usual for the left, your comments are projection.

 

[Willie99]

Again, you responded to a Washington Times article with a quote saying it was "the 1st comment" about the article.

And, there is nothing to "deflect" from since the silly liberal liar who was "digging" about hospital coverage posted a blatant lie that "watchdog.org receives 95% of their funding from the Koch Brothers"

See, I don't uncritically accept comments that confirm my biases from anonymous people on the Internet.

You do.

I'll add, your whole little exercise in bringing up Koch and talking about other organizations was a pathetic, troll attempt to not address the fact that ObamaCare doesn't really do much in comparison to what the private sector offers. As usual for the left, your comments are projection.

another vein attempt by someone trying to bring logic or consistency or comprehension into a debate

Acebb, I applaud your efforts, but you'll quickly learn that's a lost cause.

What you're arguing with is a 10 second sound bite, or maybe some liberal writers narrative (read spin). Substance, logic, reasoning are nowhere to be found.

all the best

 

[Dave007inVegas]

I see the usual suspects have banned together and have tried to use Alinskys Rule #13 of Tactics... Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. And if that doesn't work, just lie.

Well played.

 

[vitterd]

I see the usual suspects have banned together and have tried to use Alinskys Rule #13 of Tactics... Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. And if that doesn't work, just lie.

Well played.

Lol...post a hit piece from a right wing group...get called on it...claim alinsky. Another day, same thing.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Lol...post a hit piece from a right wing group...get called on it...claim alinsky. Another day, same thing.

The fact that Walmart can provide better health care than the government says it all.

 

[Willie99]

I see the usual suspects have banned together and have tried to use Alinskys Rule #13 of Tactics... Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. And if that doesn't work, just lie.

Well played.

You give them far too much credit. Their responses are not some coordinated effort to distort, deflect, deceive and recreate, their responses are a reflection of their knowledge base and intelligence

they just don't have "it", hence voting democrat is their only solution, and they espouse growing the government even when they despise government