Ignore the clueless hateful ignorant lifeless lying trolls.
When they've lost a discussion/debate they have no response except personal insults. It's the M.O.
"Psychological projection is a defence mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a bully may project their own feelings of vulnerability onto the target. It incorporates blame shifting and can manifest as shame dumping.[2"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
"Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term is applied to several different types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically it refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
When they've lost a discussion/debate they have no response except personal insults. It's the M.O.
"Psychological projection is a defence mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a bully may project their own feelings of vulnerability onto the target. It incorporates blame shifting and can manifest as shame dumping.[2"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
"Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term is applied to several different types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically it refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
ointer:This was my point. I’m not arguing for or against anything he has posted. I don’t care.
The point is he’s doing the same thing day after day. Arguing with the same people that will never agree with him. It’s pointless and a complete waste of time. But something isn’t right upstairs so it’s not registering with him.
"The tongue of the wise commends knowledge, but the mouth of the fool spouts folly." (Proverbs 15:2)
You don't know that.
You also don't know how non participants in such threads, those who read but don't post, or those who post but are neutral or undecided, are being influenced. The vast majority of readers are in this category.
If what you say is true, then why isn't it also true of the same people that you allege keep arguing with me day after day.
Yet here you are not saying anything about them needing to see a shrink, while you've said at least half a dozen times that i need to. That's fishy. Something stinks about your whole agenda. In fact a number of things stink about it.
It may be pointless to you, but not to me. And you've stated no valid reason why it must be pointless. Perhaps you should apply that logic to what you are doing here day after day & follow your own advice re a shrink.
"28-year-old Houston doctor dies after battle with coronavirus
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/22/us/ho...ath/index.html
