Okay I'm back and couldn't help myself. I have to respond to something else.
You said:
"
a. many social democratic countries in the world doing just fine and having actually a much higher living standard (not in terms of monetary flow only but also in terms of quality of life) such as sweden, france, holland etc. etc. "
Sometings you are leaving out are the things that make such a quality of life possible. Specifically I'm talking about scientific, technological, medical advances. And from what sort of system do most of these advances come from?
Do these societies contribute anything to humanity or just consume?
It's kind of funny that we're having this debate on the internet - a technology made possible by the U.S. military. You seem to enjoy basking in the glow of all that our horrible capitalist society has provided for you.
Not trying to get into a pissing contest about who invented what. I'm not even necessarily talking about the U.S. (Japan has also given you many things.)
What I'm saying is that a purely socialist system does not encourage technological advancement. Why should it? There's no incentive. It's certainly not practical.
You said:
"
a. many social democratic countries in the world doing just fine and having actually a much higher living standard (not in terms of monetary flow only but also in terms of quality of life) such as sweden, france, holland etc. etc. "
Sometings you are leaving out are the things that make such a quality of life possible. Specifically I'm talking about scientific, technological, medical advances. And from what sort of system do most of these advances come from?
Do these societies contribute anything to humanity or just consume?
It's kind of funny that we're having this debate on the internet - a technology made possible by the U.S. military. You seem to enjoy basking in the glow of all that our horrible capitalist society has provided for you.
Not trying to get into a pissing contest about who invented what. I'm not even necessarily talking about the U.S. (Japan has also given you many things.)
What I'm saying is that a purely socialist system does not encourage technological advancement. Why should it? There's no incentive. It's certainly not practical.