i dont care if its $1, profit is profit to me. why leave this big parlay on the table vs. one of the best teams in the NFL. if i can grab $90 i'll buy my niece and nephew an extra christmas gift. or i eliminate juice over my next 9 or 10 plays.
Leron McClain
educate me as to why you are both not a fan of hedging if you have a few free moments.
i like hadicapping games, but never claimed to be a whiz on the stats or percentages of hedging or parlays as i rarely play them.
thanks.....
Because then divisions and division play becomes meaningless. It sucks that 2 of 3, Jets, Phins Pats, get left out, but thats the way it goes.
Dolphs and Pats are great stories.
It just makes no sense to take yourself out of a great winning opportunity like you are in. Like I said a Gmen -3 bet to ensure 50% of what you would have won is not a bad idea cuz it is 80 bucks +/- a beer.
I just agree with a saying I once heard.........Hedging is for pussies and landscapers........... I agree with that to some extent.
Nice Day Boxslayer you are one of the best. Glad to hear you let it ride. Nice win on Fantasy shit.
educate me as to why you are both not a fan of hedging if you have a few free moments.
I'm aware that I was not asked for an opinion, but I'll give mine anyway.
I've never quite understood the logic of putting together a parlay with the intention of hedging, where the last leg begins after all of the others have finished. Basically, if you left the last leg out of the parlay, you'd already be in the winner's circle and you could play that game however way you want. There would be no need to give the house back any vig.
The only reason I see to put a game that starts after all of the others in such a parlay is if you expect the number to get worse and you really like the game at the available number.
That being said, I think everyone should play to win. Aside from the fact that I believe this game never should have been in the parlay, the only reason to hedge is if you now like the other side or if the payoff is substantial.
I'm aware that I was not asked for an opinion, but I'll give mine anyway.
I've never quite understood the logic of putting together a parlay with the intention of hedging, where the last leg begins after all of the others have finished. Basically, if you left the last leg out of the parlay, you'd already be in the winner's circle and you could play that game however way you want. There would be no need to give the house back any vig.
The only reason I see to put a game that starts after all of the others are final in such a parlay is if you expect the number to get worse and you really like the game at the available number.
That being said, I think everyone should play to win. Aside from the fact that I believe this game never should have been in the parlay, the only reason to hedge is if you now like the other side or if the payoff is substantial.