You'd think if you had a whale giving out $5k a game winner, you'd be focused solely on keeping that dude happy and not giving a F about the Rx losers like me and whomever else dares to question or push back on Biz. Quality over quantity is a good strategy for reducing stress.
I really have never heard of a pro handicapper who doesn't keep records of their season's records and performances. So former records don't matter and therefore you can't dare ask about them, yet it is perfectly fine for the handicapper to boast on the most recent success to entice new clients. That isn't really how probability and gambling works for long-term profit, as anyone can get hot in a limited time-frame capacity.
Quite interesting to come in here and see a plethora of veteran posters chiming in about Paul Perata after I got repeatedly attacked in the college hoops thread. I continue to have issues with anyone who has a bad pick day and then the followup is about how great his non-posted/private card did. That really should be irrelevant in the non-tout areas of the Rx. If I bet $250 a game on your picks, that is my choice to be dumb and follow and hope it pans out. It really bugs me to be go 0-2, down a nickel, and then be told that wow all the non-posted picks were winners.
I have no qualms with BMM as Mikey's been transparent for years on good/bad days. I don't necessarily agree with the forum allowing certain members to dangle pick carrots on the daily on Rx to also attract clients, but he is a good capper with a high-volume strategy.
