if you hit 33% you are making a good profit---and depending on which dogs win you can hit as low as 25% and make a profit---at 39% such as week 4 you would have absolutely made a killing-the worst time to use this is at the beginning of the year---
True enough...it does depend on which dogs come through. I'm not sure of a way to check back to see which ones came through. Looking at pinnacle tomorrow you have a high of +310 (Pittsburgh) and a low of +140 (Colorado) so it really is important for the high ones to come in.
I guess my point is that it is more likely for a +140 team to cover rather then a +310. If you are hitting more of the lower numbers your winning percentage would have to be faily high to make a profit.
If you were to play 4 or 5 a day and mix in some capping you could make it work. I would be a little reluctant to play all 15 games blindly. A couple of weeks in a row like week one could really hurt.
Good Luck with it but its a little too volitaile for me
no i am not a "joke or what",
yes, i am the defender of peace.
are you still mad at me for making fun of your $2 bets?
why did you post in here ? just to say that bb sucks and is usless or there are no winning systems, well light up boy we dont need this kind of persons here in this forum what did you brought good to this forum, i'll tell you what = "nothing" so stop having this negative atitude and grow up, nobody is forcing you to be on this forum if you are here to bash people then get of the train. Let the man prove this system
Uhhh... reread the thread. No one's betting EVERY alternative run line
Todd,
"Whatever usually +200-+400"
You bolded it yourself, so I don't understand what the problem is.
In any case, who cares? We're tracking it over 10 days. If it doesn't work, no one lost any money. If it does work, then we have something here.