Been A BAD Week for Drumpf

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,811
Tokens
Yeah, what a terrible week for Trump.

DeVos confirmed despite the hysterics from the left

Sessions confirmed despite the hysterics from the left

Price confirmed despite the hysterics from the left

Dow reaches another record.

Delta announces 25,000 new jobs after meeting with Trump.

Japanese PM plans to modify trade agreements (more investment in US) after meeting with Trump.

Mass immigration raids.

Polls show majority of public supports Trump's EO on immigration pause.

This poster is as dumb as guesser and Pavian.

The OP is a glass "half empty" type of guy. I personally feel any time I can see private citizen Hillary Clinton (that sounds so good to say that) get smacked down again, it's a good week. But that's just me. The sun was shining today and it was a beautiful day. My house keeps going up in value, work is good, and life is pretty damn good.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
:pointer:


FBI investigating his national security advisor for lying, Conway's ethics violation, and his twitter ramblings against an American company and federal judges.....exemplary.


Can't wait to see what they would have to do for you to think it un-exemplary!! :laughingb
Be sure to let me know the minute either one of them get indicted.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
"Jackson Fletcher" Holy Shit. I'm gonna see highlights of this kid's exploits on ESPN
He better play QB then because the NFL is: No Place for White Men (unless he plays O-Line)
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
I also am a Libertarian and care about what is best for our country and our individual freedoms. Trump is a POS for all of the things he does and says. As I said, watching him the past year and a half in action and researching years of interviews on a number of different subjects, it doesn't rake much of a brain to determine his instability. Honestly, how can you take the guy seriously with all of the stupid shit he constantly says??

What he did this week, as the President, is inexcusable and just the tip of the iceberg for this train wreck of an administration.

The problem with a Libertarian philosophy is that it isnt practical in a society like we have. Too many variables and by that, by and large, i mean too many lazy shitheads. Trump is more of a populist than anything. This idea hes a radical RightWinger is nuts. And when people make that case it means they are either a retard or just a partisan hack. You havent made that case however, you just dont like his style. He does say stupid things and yes he does appear to be a bit unhinged but we seen eight years of the opposite. Obama was almost robotic and all he did was divide people and the economy has still yet to fully recover. There was no major growth and after that recession i find that odd. For you to base the next 4 years on two weeks is a severe reach and it shows your emotions are unhinged. Youre emotional about this. Stop that. Men do not behave or are driven off of emotion. Women do that. Thats why we love them. They are different. We are logical. Think about it. Your research should have showed you he has flipped quite a bit on his positions over the years. Thats because hes a populist. He isnt beheld to an ideology hes about results. Its something we havent seen in the branch in probably 100+ years.

Post Script: Are you Asian? You typed "Rake" instead of "Take" or was that a typo? Just trying to get a mental picture of your face
 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
293
Tokens
The problem with a Libertarian philosophy is that it isnt practical in a society like we have. Too many variables and by that, by and large, i mean too many lazy shitheads. Trump is more of a populist than anything. This idea hes a radical RightWinger is nuts. And when people make that case it means they are either a retard or just a partisan hack. You havent made that case however, you just dont like his style. He does say stupid things and yes he does appear to be a bit unhinged but we seen eight years of the opposite. Obama was almost robotic and all he did was divide people and the economy has still yet to fully recover. There was no major growth and after that recession i find that odd. For you to base the next 4 years on two weeks is a severe reach and it shows your emotions are unhinged. Youre emotional about this. Stop that. Men do not behave or are driven off of emotion. Women do that. Thats why we love them. They are different. We are logical. Think about it. Your research should have showed you he has flipped quite a bit on his positions over the years. Thats because hes a populist. He isnt beheld to an ideology hes about results. Its something we havent seen in the branch in probably 100+ years.

Post Script: Are you Asian? You typed "Rake" instead of "Take" or was that a typo? Just trying to get a mental picture of your face
Couldn't have said it any better and like I've said before I wasn't a huge Trump fan but it's refreshing to see someone standing up for American's for a change.
The people criticizing Trump need to understand he is not a career politician but he is learning to calm down on Twitter and becoming more Presidential as time goes on.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Couldn't have said it any better and like I've said before I wasn't a huge Trump fan but it's refreshing to see someone standing up for American's for a change.
The people criticizing Trump need to understand he is not a career politician but he is learning to calm down on Twitter and becoming more Presidential as time goes on.
He wasnt my first choice either. Not even close. But it took time to really understand him. Im not in love with everything he says for sure nor some of the stuff he will do and pass but by and large hes putting US first for a change like you correctly have pointed out more than once here ive noticed. This a great time to be a Man in our culture. The neoliberals try as they might dont have the ideas and must use emotion. We beatt them every time in debate because you cant reason if youre constantly sliding up and down the conversation because youre stuck in your feelings. Ive talked to sooo many liberals (former) in the last year (males) that just had enough. Its like the fucking Matrix man. Just got to get these whiny fags to take the red pill. But the Red pill is racist because it doesnt include the blue pill. And yada yada yada. It takes time but its worth it. Our way of life depends on guys like you.
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
The problem with a Libertarian philosophy is that it isnt practical in a society like we have. Too many variables and by that, by and large, i mean too many lazy shitheads. Trump is more of a populist than anything. This idea hes a radical RightWinger is nuts. And when people make that case it means they are either a retard or just a partisan hack. You havent made that case however, you just dont like his style. He does say stupid things and yes he does appear to be a bit unhinged but we seen eight years of the opposite. Obama was almost robotic and all he did was divide people and the economy has still yet to fully recover. There was no major growth and after that recession i find that odd. For you to base the next 4 years on two weeks is a severe reach and it shows your emotions are unhinged. Youre emotional about this. Stop that. Men do not behave or are driven off of emotion. Women do that. Thats why we love them. They are different. We are logical. Think about it. Your research should have showed you he has flipped quite a bit on his positions over the years. Thats because hes a populist. He isnt beheld to an ideology hes about results. Its something we havent seen in the branch in probably 100+ years.

Post Script: Are you Asian? You typed "Rake" instead of "Take" or was that a typo? Just trying to get a mental picture of your face



No one philosophy is practical in today's society, that is why the two party system is broken. I do not believe in every Libertarian point nor should every Democrat or Republican believe in everyone of their respective points. But people do. Party over country, on both sides, which is why our country is so divided today. And as I have stated before, could ultimately lead to the end of our democracy as we know it. But who knows, maybe that would be a good thing?

Your observation about men and woman is a bit myopic. I have met many emotional men and many logical women. Doesn't make either wrong or ineffective as that can be a situational matter. My observations and the point of my post with Trump is not about emotions, but rather discrediting the ruse that most right wingers have bought into. He is not a populist and he is not draining the swamp. The system is not set up for a drain. All he has done is replace the old with his cronies and billionaires that contributed to his campaign. Second verse same as the first.

Real change- a real draining would be eliminating all of the laws that inhibit our personal freedoms. All drugs should be legalized for use- thus eliminating the billions wasted on the so-called war. Repeal the Patriot Act and all laws related to prostitution, gambling, censorship etc. Let people get fucking married- period. Don't repeal and replace Obamacare, break up the government and insurance industry monopolies and create access to affordable, good quality healthcare. Forget tax cuts- how about implementing a 10% flat tax rate for every person and every entity- including all religious ones. No more tax shelters, tax breaks, write offs, people/corporations/not-for profits paying tax. This all but eliminates the need for the IRS. I could go on about the reduction of federal departments but you get the idea.

And yes it was a typo- r is next to t.
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
He wasnt my first choice either. Not even close. But it took time to really understand him. Im not in love with everything he says for sure nor some of the stuff he will do and pass but by and large hes putting US first for a change like you correctly have pointed out more than once here ive noticed. This a great time to be a Man in our culture. The neoliberals try as they might dont have the ideas and must use emotion. We beatt them every time in debate because you cant reason if youre constantly sliding up and down the conversation because youre stuck in your feelings. Ive talked to sooo many liberals (former) in the last year (males) that just had enough. Its like the fucking Matrix man. Just got to get these whiny fags to take the red pill. But the Red pill is racist because it doesnt include the blue pill. And yada yada yada. It takes time but its worth it. Our way of life depends on guys like you.


I have noticed you use the term Neoliberals/liberalism frequently- you do realize that the term actually refers to extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization, fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
I have noticed you use the term Neoliberals/liberalism frequently- you do realize that the term actually refers to extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization, fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society?

I would consider myslef a classic liberal but since the term was hijacked by the left im forced to call them neoliberals. I dont mean that in any form you defined for them
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
16,015
Tokens
I also am a Libertarian and care about what is best for our country and our individual freedoms. Trump is a POS for all of the things he does and says. As I said, watching him the past year and a half in action and researching years of interviews on a number of different subjects, it doesn't rake much of a brain to determine his instability. Honestly, how can you take the guy seriously with all of the stupid shit he constantly says??

What he did this week, as the President, is inexcusable and just the tip of the iceberg for this train wreck of an administration.

We all understand he can't control his mouth - but the policies work - would u rather have Trump SAY retarded things - or have Obama DO retarded things - like light the White House up in rainbow colors like were are all sissys - or put a tranny in his cabinet - how can you not be thrilled Trump is hunting these pricks down and getting them the fuck out? I hate political correctness - I want it gone - I just read that Beyoncé didn't win the Grammy because of race - nothing to do that Adele has a voice like Boccelli
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
16,015
Tokens
BZ, I want a to know what Trump has "DONE" that bothers u - what specific actions
 

BZ

RX Original
Joined
Oct 21, 2001
Messages
17,531
Tokens
BZ, I want a to know what Trump has "DONE" that bothers u


Seymour,
This past week- read the first post I made in this thread.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,239
Tokens
I would consider myslef a classic liberal but since the term was hijacked by the left im forced to call them neoliberals. I dont mean that in any form you defined for them

stop kidding yourself fetcher, you're sounding more and more like me every week

like a fine wine, you're improving with age
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
No one philosophy is practical in today's society, that is why the two party system is broken. I do not believe in every Libertarian point nor should every Democrat or Republican believe in everyone of their respective points. But people do. Party over country, on both sides, which is why our country is so divided today. And as I have stated before, could ultimately lead to the end of our democracy as we know it. But who knows, maybe that would be a good thing?

Your observation about men and woman is a bit myopic. I have met many emotional men and many logical women. Doesn't make either wrong or ineffective as that can be a situational matter. My observations and the point of my post with Trump is not about emotions, but rather discrediting the ruse that most right wingers have bought into. He is not a populist and he is not draining the swamp. The system is not set up for a drain. All he has done is replace the old with his cronies and billionaires that contributed to his campaign. Second verse same as the first.

Real change- a real draining would be eliminating all of the laws that inhibit our personal freedoms. All drugs should be legalized for use- thus eliminating the billions wasted on the so-called war. Repeal the Patriot Act and all laws related to prostitution, gambling, censorship etc. Let people get fucking married- period. Don't repeal and replace Obamacare, break up the government and insurance industry monopolies and create access to affordable, good quality healthcare. Forget tax cuts- how about implementing a 10% flat tax rate for every person and every entity- including all religious ones. No more tax shelters, tax breaks, write offs, people/corporations/not-for profits paying tax. This all but eliminates the need for the IRS. I could go on about the reduction of federal departments but you get the idea.

And yes it was a typo- r is next to t.

Trump is a total populist. Think about what he is totally to the Left on:

Gay issues
Eminent domain
Trade
Healthcare
Women in the workforce tasks
Entitlements
Just to name a few off the top of my head

Of course i was using a generalization about women and men but its true. Men are more logical. Women are not. Is there any wonder why so few engineers that are women? Let me give you some anecdotal experience for a background: Im 37 full disclosure. I have a daughter who is 19 and goes to Penn State. One of her engineering lectures has 200 students. Only 10 are Girls. She also took a feminism class. That teacher and those militant girls blame the lack of numbers of women in engineering on men. In thats its not inclusive enough. Nevermind most engineers are some of the most Type A people on the planet. Fortunately, she was raised on Libertarian principals so she knows better. She has a friend who came over from Sudan. Muslim girl. Now shes a feminist. Do that math. They did a "White privilege walk" in that feminist class. Everyone starts out at the same line and they ask a question and for everyone you can say yes to you step forward. Things like "did you play travel sports" "Did you go to any summer camps" "have you ever had braces" "are both your parents together" etc tec. We had her when i was 18. To say it was a struggle was an understatement. But we did the best we could. Never bought anything for ourselves for years. Never saved a dime for years. We did what we had to do to give her all we could. Thats privilege? Its these myths and nonsense im talking about when it comes to men being men and women being women. Feminism, Islam, liberal geopolitical thought and policy and other ideas are threats to the West as we now it. Im not ok with that. If we, as men dont understand that we will lose it. Europe is a prime example. I refused to be willingly cucked.

Youre not going to be able to just dump healthcare now and sort out government/insurance companys. It would be political suicide. Not necessarily the right thing to do but nobody now would crawl into that boat after Obama put a bunch of millions of people on the insurance dole no matter how ineffective it is. There will be a replace.

Im with ending the drug war and legalizing alot of what you said but that doesnt appear to be on the agenda. Again, hes a populist.

If you went back to year 2000 spending levels the need for the IRS would cease to exist. You wouldnt need that tax. Im all for non profits paying something as well but to tax them a corporate rate would be insane. They dont show a profit and in doing so you would wipe a shit ton of charities out that do alot of good thus creating a whole new set of problems.

Obviously you have sound Libertarian principals and i do as well. If you look at my comments and threads and writing from 06-12 you would see striking similarities to what you say. Ive come to the understanding however you have to be willing to compromise some of your principals. Not nice to say but some are just more important than the others. Libertarianism is basically survival of the fittest. Im 100% down with that but it doesn't preserve our culture. Think about the most extreme cases... Libertarianism would blindly allow a Muslim majority to enter and out populate us. Then all of our freedom loving ways would be lost. The culture is #1 priority for guys like you and me. Think about it.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
stop kidding yourself fetcher, you're sounding more and more like me every week

like a fine wine, you're improving with age

You old senile fuck. You have some merit to that statement. I absolutely fucking despise saying or admitting it but i wont disagree too much. You and i had our battles over the years and if we bumped threads we could probably pick them back up but i would also think there might be more than a few i would just waive the white flag on. Having kids for me was the biggest eye opener. Watching them grow up and seeing the world become more and more liberal. I give credit to JoeC (Sherrif joe now lmao) he was talking culture a long time ago and even away from here i would think about that over the years. Also, "Death of the West" was a great read. Pat Buchanan is a national treasure.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,020
Tokens
You old senile fuck. You have some merit to that statement. I absolutely fucking despise saying or admitting it but i wont disagree too much. You and i had our battles over the years and if we bumped threads we could probably pick them back up but i would also think there might be more than a few i would just waive the white flag on. Having kids for me was the biggest eye opener. Watching them grow up and seeing the world become more and more liberal. I give credit to JoeC (Sherrif joe now lmao) he was talking culture a long time ago and even away from here i would think about that over the years. Also, "Death of the West" was a great read. Pat Buchanan is a national treasure.

Amazing how having a couple kids, and growing older can change one's politics.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
Fletch......good to see you back posting.

MAGA
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Amazing how having a couple kids, and growing older can change one's politics.

i think kids and age will or should gain you wisdom in life experience. Some don't seem to grasp this but for most of us i think its safe to say this is true. I think you always should be changing or at least growing. It seems for me politically speaking ive just made some deals in what i think is important. Priorities change. So youre 100% correct Zit, it is amazing how are politics do change as we age. Whats concerning me is how fast it has changed over the last 2-5 years. I've talked to dozens of younger cats over the last year or so who have had enough of the left as well. So youre seeing more and more kids turn right younger than probably ever before. This is a culture war.

Fletch......good to see you back posting.

MAGA

MAGA indeed my man. Wasnt super pumped for Trump at any point up until about mid summer. I knew i couldnt vote Libertarian this election. I was seriously scared of the Clinton machine winning. The amount of corruption is so vast and her beef with Russia was fucking strange... So i got involved with my community and watched it go red for the first time since 1988. I even un-cucked some friends along the way back here at home so there is that.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Pat Buchanan is a national treasure.

I'm not a fan:

[h=3]Charges of antisemitism and Holocaust denial[/h]Buchanan wrote that it was impossible for 850,000 Jews to be killed by diesel exhaust fed into the gas chamber at Treblinka in a column for The New York Post in 1990.[SUP][19][/SUP] Buchanan once argued Treblinka "was not a death camp but a transit camp used as a 'pass-through point' for prisoners". In fact, some 900,000 Jews had died at Treblinka.[SUP][20][/SUP] When George Will challenged him about it on TV, Buchanan did not reply. In 1991 William F. Buckley, Jr. wrote a 40,000-word National Review article discussing anti-Semitism among conservative commentators focused largely on Buchanan; the article and many responses to it were collected in the book In Search of Anti-Semitism (1992). He concluded: "I find it impossible to defend Pat Buchanan against the charge that what he did and said during the period under examination amounted to anti-Semitism."[SUP][21][/SUP][SUP][22][/SUP]
The Anti-Defamation League has called Buchanan an "unrepentant bigot" who "repeatedly demonizes Jews and minorities and openly affiliates with white supremacists."[SUP][23][/SUP] "There's no doubt," said Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Charles Krauthammer, "he makes subliminal appeals to prejudice."[SUP][24][/SUP] Buchanan denies that he is antisemitic, and a number of his journalistic colleagues, including Murray Rothbard,[SUP][25][/SUP][SUP][26][/SUP][SUP][27][/SUP] Justin Raimondo,[SUP][28][/SUP] Jack Germond, Al Hunt and Mark Shields, have defended him against the charge.[SUP][29][/SUP] As a member of the Reagan White House, he is accused of having suppressed the Reagan Justice Department's investigation into Nazi scientists brought to America by the OSS's Operation Paperclip.[SUP][30][/SUP] In the context of the Gulf War, on September 15, 1990, Buchanan appeared on The McLaughlin Group and said that "there are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East – the Israeli defense ministry and its 'amen corner' in the United States." He also said: "The Israelis want this war desperately because they want the United States to destroy the Iraqi war machine. They want us to finish them off. They don't care about our relations with the Arab world."[SUP][31][/SUP] Furthermore, on The McLaughlin Group Buchanan has also made such comments as “‘Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory’ and ‘If you want to know ethnicity and power in the United States Senate, 13 members of the Senate are Jewish folks who are from 2 percent of the population. That is where real power is at…’”[SUP][32][/SUP]
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
I'm not a fan:

Charges of antisemitism and Holocaust denial

Buchanan wrote that it was impossible for 850,000 Jews to be killed by diesel exhaust fed into the gas chamber at Treblinka in a column for The New York Post in 1990.[SUP][19][/SUP] Buchanan once argued Treblinka "was not a death camp but a transit camp used as a 'pass-through point' for prisoners". In fact, some 900,000 Jews had died at Treblinka.[SUP][20][/SUP] When George Will challenged him about it on TV, Buchanan did not reply. In 1991 William F. Buckley, Jr. wrote a 40,000-word National Review article discussing anti-Semitism among conservative commentators focused largely on Buchanan; the article and many responses to it were collected in the book In Search of Anti-Semitism (1992). He concluded: "I find it impossible to defend Pat Buchanan against the charge that what he did and said during the period under examination amounted to anti-Semitism."[SUP][21][/SUP][SUP][22][/SUP]
The Anti-Defamation League has called Buchanan an "unrepentant bigot" who "repeatedly demonizes Jews and minorities and openly affiliates with white supremacists."[SUP][23][/SUP] "There's no doubt," said Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Charles Krauthammer, "he makes subliminal appeals to prejudice."[SUP][24][/SUP] Buchanan denies that he is antisemitic, and a number of his journalistic colleagues, including Murray Rothbard,[SUP][25][/SUP][SUP][26][/SUP][SUP][27][/SUP] Justin Raimondo,[SUP][28][/SUP] Jack Germond, Al Hunt and Mark Shields, have defended him against the charge.[SUP][29][/SUP] As a member of the Reagan White House, he is accused of having suppressed the Reagan Justice Department's investigation into Nazi scientists brought to America by the OSS's Operation Paperclip.[SUP][30][/SUP] In the context of the Gulf War, on September 15, 1990, Buchanan appeared on The McLaughlin Group and said that "there are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East – the Israeli defense ministry and its 'amen corner' in the United States." He also said: "The Israelis want this war desperately because they want the United States to destroy the Iraqi war machine. They want us to finish them off. They don't care about our relations with the Arab world."[SUP][31][/SUP] Furthermore, on The McLaughlin Group Buchanan has also made such comments as “‘Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory’ and ‘If you want to know ethnicity and power in the United States Senate, 13 members of the Senate are Jewish folks who are from 2 percent of the population. That is where real power is at…’”[SUP][32][/SUP]
Im certainly not a fan of that. Not sure what the purpose would be to even write something like that. Its news to me obviously but that book he wrote was one of the biggest wakeup calls for me (The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Culture and Civilization). But im not a proponent of arguing the holocaust. Ive seen enough black and white movies/footage to not split hairs with that .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,945
Messages
13,589,067
Members
101,021
Latest member
bradduke112
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com