Just so people know Im not being unfair, untruthful or taking crazy pills...
My original post was 4/17...on 4/22, not even 1 week, he has released another Game of the Year. LMAO.
The funny thing is, he made this innocent post..."I dont hype my plays like others lead you to believe", then 2 days later busts out another game of the year. what a joke.
Its another tough one, too. He's actually making a bigger stand this time. I think the White Sox play was -300 juice. This one is only -200 juice. LOL. So once again, he's really taking a stand. So confident in this play he's laying -200 juice on the road and calling it Play of the Year. 2nd time this week. I know, somewhere Ron Burgandy is saying...
"That doesnt make sense."
His reasoning and analysis? Well, it's the Royals. Wickman sucks, but Byrd will fly high. How can you resist this capping job?
Something tells me this was his thought process...
"AHHHHHH, it's been 3 days since I have had a Play of the Year, I cant take Boxslayer calling me out, making me post plays without stars all around them. I cant take it anymore...whoever the Royals are playing tomorrow, Im betting against them and calling it play of the year. I could really use the attention. It should win, I mean after all the Royals suck. Who are they playing? Oh Cleveland? Play of the year. Thats it. I'm doing it now. It probably shouldnt lose, I mean its the Royals, and even if it does, I'll let the thread slip to the bottom, and post another one a few days later and lay -400 and that should win and people will forget I ever lost this play."
My original post was 4/17...on 4/22, not even 1 week, he has released another Game of the Year. LMAO.
The funny thing is, he made this innocent post..."I dont hype my plays like others lead you to believe", then 2 days later busts out another game of the year. what a joke.
Its another tough one, too. He's actually making a bigger stand this time. I think the White Sox play was -300 juice. This one is only -200 juice. LOL. So once again, he's really taking a stand. So confident in this play he's laying -200 juice on the road and calling it Play of the Year. 2nd time this week. I know, somewhere Ron Burgandy is saying...
"That doesnt make sense."
His reasoning and analysis? Well, it's the Royals. Wickman sucks, but Byrd will fly high. How can you resist this capping job?
Something tells me this was his thought process...
"AHHHHHH, it's been 3 days since I have had a Play of the Year, I cant take Boxslayer calling me out, making me post plays without stars all around them. I cant take it anymore...whoever the Royals are playing tomorrow, Im betting against them and calling it play of the year. I could really use the attention. It should win, I mean after all the Royals suck. Who are they playing? Oh Cleveland? Play of the year. Thats it. I'm doing it now. It probably shouldnt lose, I mean its the Royals, and even if it does, I'll let the thread slip to the bottom, and post another one a few days later and lay -400 and that should win and people will forget I ever lost this play."
