Darryl Parsons said:Max,
Bearding by definition involves someone else, usually a very big player who needs help to get all his action down because he likes to bet much more than the limit. In exchange for helping him, you get paid. From a book's perspective this is nothing more than players forming partnerships for the purpose of exceeding their limits. Usually the rules will state that this is not allowed, but it is often hard to prove.
Pinnacle has the antedote because their software automatically adjusts the line after every single (significant) play, and players are profiled so the line moves more for some players than others. Against this system, using beards or being a beard are losing propositions. Other books have not implemented such an effective antedote yet either because it's too expensive and complicated, or because they feel they can control the few isolated incidents manually.
This is how I see it anyway...I've never bearded or used beards, just common sense and observation on my part. If I made a mistake in the above, I'd appreciate it if someone in the know would point it out...
All afternoon I've been reading this statement, every book at one point or another has booted a sharp. I will find out Greenhead story,I know its two sides to every story. but anyway I think Greenhead can bet Delmar the rest of his life and not get booted. Spiro has never booted anybody from betting him without probable cause. I will find out.Moon88 said:Rainbow you seem a little twisted of late. Every book at one point or another has booted a sharp. Taking stabs..... in/out is always a concern for books. Using a sharps info near gametime usually is not beneficial. Sharps are a pain........the thought of having to wait for them to come in with plays can be very time consuming and stressful. Books hang #'s to be played...some action may not be liked.
oldmanTED said:Rainbow:
There are a number of ways to beat a book so badly that you are asked to leave including Olympic. Sports wagering is by no means the only way. Even Spiro knows when he is facing a man he cannot beat and doesn't know why. He will cut his losses as it is a wise business decision. He's done it before and he will do it again because it is the smart thing to do. End of story.
oldmanTED said:Rainbow:
There are a number of ways to beat a book so badly that you are asked to leave including Olympic. Sports wagering is by no means the only way. Even Spiro knows when he is facing a man he cannot beat and doesn't know why. He will cut his losses as it is a wise business decision. He's done it before and he will do it again because it is the smart thing to do. End of story.
oldmanTED said:Rainbow:
You need to read my posts carefully. I have consistently said that even Spiro will make business decisions to either cut limits or boot players he cannot beat when he knows it. I specifically indicated that I wasn't necessarily referring to the traditional sports. You are not privy to all the facts I am referring too here. As the response presented by The General in his communication with Spiro indicates, limits will be cut on the type of bets where he feels he is at a disadvantage and there are a number of them as he honestly stated. Reread the response from Spiro to The General. It is clear and accurate. There will be no debate from me as I know the facts involved and you do not. End of story.