I don't have an opinion either way on Ashcroft. But the guy he ran against died in a plane crash a couple of weeks before the election. Of course he was going to win it after that.doc mercer said:Didnt the folks of Missouri prefer a dead man over Ashcroft I recall an election in that state ...
It was Mel Carnahan, a Democrat, and Mel won the election (us senate) even though he had died. I don't believe foul play was ever considered. His wife then assumed his seat in Congress.Illini said:I don't have an opinion either way on Ashcroft. But the guy he ran against died in a plane crash a couple of weeks before the election. Of course he was going to win it after that.
I'm sorry gameface. I agree with a lot of your political views but you are not seeing the truth here. Ashcroft's abuses are what caused the enemy combatants to get let go. If he would have held them according to the book they would still be in Gitmo. His incompetence let them kill other Americans, not ACLU attorneys. ACLU attorneys are powerless unless the courts agree with them.GAMEFACE said:Quantum,
LMFAO! So the only people that Ashcroft so-called wronged were terrorist and child molestors. So you're OK with arresting an enemy combatant on the battle field then releasing the terrorist because of some leftist ACLU attorney says so and later having the terrorist kill our boys in Afghanistan or Iraq? I'm not they can sit at Gitmo until the war ends, end of story.
Give me a break, you actually proved my point quite well. So Ashcroft hasn't just drug people in off the street and made up charges? Ashcroft arrested this scum for apparently good reasons. Sure the molestors were going to a group called candyman to discuss children education and little league, sure the enemy arrested were flying kites. LMAO!:kicking: