Anyone know someone who has died from the Coronavirus?

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2004
Messages
2,042
Tokens
A 13-year-old boy who tested positive for coronavirus has died, a London hospital trust has said.


Mohamed Abdulwahab, from Brixton in south London, died in King's College Hospital early on Monday. He is thought to be the youngest person to have died with the virus in the UK.

A spokesman for the trust said the boy's death had been referred to the coroner, but gave no further details.

As of 17:00 BST on Monday, the number of UK deaths was 1,789.

The latest figures saw a daily increase of 381 - the biggest rise so far.

Ismail's family said they were "beyond devastated" by his death, in a statement released by a family friend.

They said he had no apparent underlying health conditions and tested positive for Covid-19 on Friday, a day after he was admitted to hospital.

BBC health correspondent Nick Triggle said it was rare for teenagers to become seriously ill after being infected with coronavirus.

"Just 0.3% of those who show symptoms require hospital care and 0.006% die - in other words, two out of every 30,000 infections among this age group will not survive," he said.

"But it does happen, as this distressing case shows."

Ismail's family said he was admitted to the hospital in south London after he had begun showing symptoms and having difficulties breathing.

"He was put on a ventilator and then put into an induced coma but sadly died yesterday [Monday] morning," they said.

"To our knowledge he had no underlying health conditions. We are beyond devastated."

Mark Stephenson, college director at Madinah College, in south-west London, where Ismail's sister works as a teacher, has set up a fundraiser to raise money for the funeral costs.

A statement on the page said Ismail died "without any family members close by due to the highly infectious nature of Covid-19".
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
So around 56% of NYC deaths are people under 75 years old

30% under 64 years old

So tell me again how this "Everyone goes back to work and everything starts back up but the olds and sick" thing works?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
So around 56% of NYC deaths are people under 75 years old

30% under 64 years old

So tell me again how this "Everyone goes back to work and everything starts back up but the olds and sick" thing works?




Enflameo? Rednose?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,891
Tokens
[h=1]Average Age of Coronavirus Deaths in Florida is 79[/h]
By Steve Stewart on <time class="published updated" style="box-sizing: border-box;" itemprop="datePublished" datetime="March 21, 2020T9:07 pm">March 21, 2020</time>16 Comments

<section class="article-wrapper" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); display: block; font-family: georgia,"times new roman",times,serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 24px; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"> <article class="entry post-213294 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-exclusive category-florida_news last_archivepost" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: block;" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/NewsArticle">

COVIDDeaths-1.jpg
</article></section>
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,891
Tokens
That has to really put things in perspective - if you're 88, 92 or 96 you DID NOT die from Corona Virus
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Agree, but you still are a live body in the ICU which means someone else could die if curve isn't flattened.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
So around 56% of NYC deaths are people under 75 years old

30% under 64 years old

So tell me again how this "Everyone goes back to work and everything starts back up but the olds and sick" thing works?

That chart shows 1,096 deaths in NYC so far with 70% of the deaths having been with victims 64 years and over. Of those 64 years of age and over, all but 3 had underlying conditions with more pending.

Out of 785 victims (1,096 minus the underlying condition victims pending) 14 had no underlying conditions meaning less than 1% of these victims had no underlying conditions.

The chart shows clearly a majority of victims are 64 and over with underlying conditions.

Take what you want from the chart and interpret the data how you'd like.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Agree, but you still are a live body in the ICU which means someone else could die if curve isn't flattened.

Pats - I've read hospital waiting rooms are completely empty now as the hospitals are keeping patients completely quarantined from one another. Don't know how true that is.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
47,872
Tokens
So around 56% of NYC deaths are people under 75 years old

30% under 64 years old

So tell me again how this "Everyone goes back to work and everything starts back up but the olds and sick" thing works?

Except only 14 of 1096 patients had no underlying conditions.

1.28%

So if you have no underlying conditions, no matter what age, you are not at risk.

The next question needs to be what percentage of people with underlying conditions recover? The assumption always seems to be that they will die if they are infected by Covid. That is an inaccurate assumption.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Pats, let me ask you this. Is it conceivable to believe most deaths are coming as a result of the underlying conditions which are exacerbated by the presence of COVID?
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Now, let's show a comparison chart during the normal flu season. I'd like to compare the numbers.

Never thought I'd care so much about the flu in my life.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
50,757
Tokens
That chart shows 1,096 deaths in NYC so far with 70% of the deaths having been with victims 64 years and over. Of those 64 years of age and over, all but 3 had underlying conditions with more pending.

Out of 785 victims (1,096 minus the underlying condition victims pending) 14 had no underlying conditions meaning less than 1% of these victims had no underlying conditions.

The chart shows clearly a majority of victims are 64 and over with underlying conditions.

Take what you want from the chart and interpret the data how you'd like.

Same as Italy.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
That chart shows 1,096 deaths in NYC so far with 70% of the deaths having been with victims 64 years and over. Of those 64 years of age and over, all but 3 had underlying conditions with more pending.

Out of 785 victims (1,096 minus the underlying condition victims pending) 14 had no underlying conditions meaning less than 1% of these victims had no underlying conditions.

The chart shows clearly a majority of victims are 64 and over with underlying conditions.

Take what you want from the chart and interpret the data how you'd like.

I know, I just said that.

Not exactly "Just killing 80 year olds" anymore, eh?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
50,757
Tokens
I know, I just said that.

Not exactly "Just killing 80 year olds" anymore, eh?

Who said only the elderly? People with preexisting illnesses and weak immune systems are "high risk", and it goes without saying the elderly often fall into this category.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1155427&p=13088800&viewfull=1#post13088800

Plus I saw you at least a dozen other posts in first half of March specifically accuse media of hysterical COVID reporting solely to thwart trump2020

No worries....during that time period you were certainly not alone w that mindset...glad to see you set it aside

I think you and I are talking about semantics.

What I've been steadfast about is although this situation is not a hoax, the media has overhyped the situation with an ultimate goal of making the President's response look less than stellar. Once they realized the catastrophic financial damage this virus would do to the economy, they knew that was the icing on the cake as the economy is Trump's go to campaign #1.

They did not report on this virus solely to thwart Trump as you mentioned. That's not what I've said all along. They have honestly reported on the situation but have also overhyped it too which I think you may agree with Barman.

They did not report this way when Obama was in the WH during his pandemic situation. You know that's accurate.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
5,412
Tokens
11 days ago

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1155741&p=13093762&viewfull=1#post13093762

We invite you to join us as we now politely bail from Any further discussion on this topic save for straight reporting of data (cases, hospitalizations, recoveries, deaths)

The multi(50+)-thread efforts to "blame" (either WH or Dems or media) for anything that occurred between Jan 3 (when trump was first informed of Covid) and about Mar 29 seem a real waste of happy life.....cheers
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,242
Messages
13,531,150
Members
100,352
Latest member
grechrichard719
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com