Anyone Have the ESPN Video of Gruden and Newton?

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
15,486
Tokens
I think newton will be a bust in the same category as leaf & russell...

Jon Gruden went over the way NFL offenses call plays & what the QB needs to do in the huddle...

apparently newton looked really bad in the segment w/Gruden & complained that he was being put on the spot...poor kid...

Gruden made it easier & asked newton to call a play from the auburn offense...

newton couldn't...

looks like ron rivera had better invest in a few hundred,... color boards with numbers...

:ohno:
 

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
15,486
Tokens
Jon Gruden puts Cam Newton “on the spot”

Posted by Mike Florio on April 18, 2011, 8:01 AM EDT
jongrudenchuckyface.jpg
AP

Last year, Jon Gruden’s too-bad-he-doesn’t-bring-it-like-that-in-the-broadcast-booth style of pressing incoming rookie quarterbacks adroitly cajoled Jimmy Clausen into placing blame on one of his receivers for a play that resulted in an interception. Mike Mayock of NFL Network concluded that the segment may have hurt Clausen’s draft stock.

This year, Gruden has exposed one of the stated concerns regarding the man widely expected to be the first pick in the draft: Cam Newton.

In a segment from Gruden’s second annual QB Camp playing currently in the perpetual SportsCenter loop, the former Raiders and Bucs coach tries to show Newton how different an NFL offense will be from the one he ran at Auburn.

“You know, some of this verbiage in the NFL, I don’t know how it was at Auburn, but it’s — it’s long. You’ve got the shifts, the plays, the protections, the snap count, the alert, the check-with-mes,” Gruden said, snapping his fingers after listing each element of an NFL play call.

Then Gruden rattled one off: “I mean, flip right, double-X, Jet, 36 counter, naked waggle, X-7, X-quarter.” As Gruden was firing off that play, Newton shook his head and smiled, as if he’d never head before anything like that, ever.

Then Gruden pounced.

“Call something at Auburn that’s a little verbal,” Gruden said, obviously knowing the answer to the question. “What would be a little verbal? Any recollection on that?

Newton: “Um.”

“Gimme something,” Gruden said. “What’s an Auburn play sound like?”

“I mean, you’re putting me on the — on the spot,” Newton said.

Having already proven his point, Gruden then gave Newton a lifeline. “You guys don’t get in the huddle much though, right?” Gruden said.

Newton welcomed that one. “We really don’t,” Newton said. “And our method is ‘simplistic equals fast.’ It’s so simple as far as, you look to the sideline [and] you see 36 on the board. And that’s a play. And we’re off.”

“That’s awesome,” Gruden said, but presumably not using the word in the same way that, say, Chris Farley would have.

“Let me make this point, though,” Gruden said. “The number one challenge you’re gonna have right away is the verbiage. And just getting comfortable with what we’re calling formations, what we’re calling routes. The alerts. The language. Speaking the language. You’re gonna move to France, and you’re gonna have to speak French, pretty quick. And that’ll be one of the big challenges immediately that you have because you haven’t been in a lot of these huddles, have you?”

The strong possibility that Newton won’t be able to begin his French lessons until September will make it harder for him to play as a rookie, regardless of where he’s drafted. But it still looks like the team that disregarded Clausen’s flaws in 2010 — the Panthers — will take the leap of faith on Newton in 2011.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
<object width="384" height="216" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" id="ESPN_VIDEO" data="http://espn.go.com/videohub/player/embed.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" allowNetworking="all"><param name="movie" value="http://espn.go.com/videohub/player/embed.swf" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="wmode" value="opaque"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"/><param name="flashVars" value="id=6375220"/></object>
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,470
Tokens
Im telling you all the 1st round QBs are way over rated.
I did not see Newton yet, but that has nothing to do with the fact that I think he is a huge bust regardless.
I saw Gabberts segment, and he was also a joke.

Dalton and Ponder are going to be better then all the 1st round QBs.
You heard it right. Both of them.

The only 1st round QB that even has a chance to be any good is Locker.
And even he has a huge downside.
It will take the perfect situation for him to be a success.

Gabbert, Newton, and mallet all bust
 

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
15,486
Tokens
i would love to see newton try & run the Colts no huddle offense...

'simplistic & fast'...

well that ain't gonna cut it
 

New member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
6,900
Tokens
choptalk, ponder really? He was dumb as an ox with his decision-making at FSU.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
4,468
Tokens
talks like that beauty queen a few years back..listen to what he says and then say wtf was he sayin?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
5,066
Tokens
If he fails in the NFL, it won't be because of his leadership qualities. Those guys you mentioned, Russell, Leaf, and Clausen, all had known leadership problems coming out of school. Cam doesnt have those issues- all his teammates talked about what a great leader he was, and he lead quite a few 4th quarter comebacks and wins in tight games. If he fails, it will be because his game doesn't translate to the next level, which Gruden is pointing out is very different from the college game. But I don't think Leaf and Russell are fair comparisons.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
I'm sticking to my guns. Ryan Mallett is definitely the best QB in the draft.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
5,066
Tokens
I'm not blown away by any of these QB prospects, I don't think any of them are as sure a thing as I thought Bradford was coming out. Mallett is probably the most talented but his attitude and leadership is really getting questioned, which you saw with players like Leinart and Clausen that proved to be pretty accurate. I don't know if Newton or Locker have the arm to play at an elite level in the NFL. And I think Gabbert is probably suited to be an NFL backup opposed to a starter.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
I can't believe I agree with Choptalk, but I don't like any of the QBs in this draft.

Gabbert- Is unproven, just a measureables guys imo.
Jake- Locker - No bigger fan than me, but this can over throw a country by himself.
Cam- has accuracy issues.
Mallet- is sitting duck
Ponder - will be a career back
McElroy - See Jason Garrett
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
I'm not blown away by any of these QB prospects, I don't think any of them are as sure a thing as I thought Bradford was coming out. Mallett is probably the most talented but his attitude and leadership is really getting questioned, which you saw with players like Leinart and Clausen that proved to be pretty accurate. I don't know if Newton or Locker have the arm to play at an elite level in the NFL. And I think Gabbert is probably suited to be an NFL backup opposed to a starter.

I said it before and I will say it again. Sam Bradford is the most accurate passer I have seen in 25 years of watching College football.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,470
Tokens
Locker has a ton of arm to be an NFL QB. As a matter of fact, I would say he has the strongest arm of any QB mentioned in this thread besides Leaf and Russell.


I'm not blown away by any of these QB prospects, I don't think any of them are as sure a thing as I thought Bradford was coming out. Mallett is probably the most talented but his attitude and leadership is really getting questioned, which you saw with players like Leinart and Clausen that proved to be pretty accurate. I don't know if Newton or Locker have the arm to play at an elite level in the NFL. And I think Gabbert is probably suited to be an NFL backup opposed to a starter.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Locker has a ton of arm to be an NFL QB. As a matter of fact, I would say he has the strongest arm of any QB mentioned in this thread besides Leaf and Russell.

Locker doesn't have a stronger arm than Mallet.

Jake should have just played baseball.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,470
Tokens
Yea, my mistake. But the point is, Locker has a ton of arm.
He is the most physically gifted QB in the entire draft.
I believe he ran the 40 in a faster time then Cam Newton.
If he could ever just learn to throw straight.
 

Where Taconite Is Just A Low Grade Ore
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Messages
8,490
Tokens
ALL of these so called "athletic" QB's have one thing in common, they're morons. Russell, Culpepper, Young, etc.! IQ's of a dim bulb. Can't adjust to NFL D's or absorb verbage & make adjustments on the fly. Give me Dalton over all these "guns". IMO the greatest QB ever, Joe Cool didn't have a "big" arm either, football smarts are inherent, something you can't teach.:ohno:
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
5,066
Tokens
Locker has a ton of arm to be an NFL QB. As a matter of fact, I would say he has the strongest arm of any QB mentioned in this thread besides Leaf and Russell.


Sorry I should have been more clear- its not the arm strength I question in Locker or Newton. I don't think they are accurate enough.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,887
Messages
13,560,991
Members
100,704
Latest member
cameron2324243
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com