Any Liberal or anyone else whom agrees w/ Hilary on this, please explain why

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
We live in a weird time. 90% of people want every damn issue to be black and white. You either have to be pro-business and anti-worker or pro-worker and anti-business. I find it to be absurd.

You're the one who made the assumption that all businesses would be treated equal and made this a black and white issue. I'm talking about corporations that have trillions of dollars in cash, make record profits, and the disparity of income between the top and bottom is that of a 3rd world country. You guys then immediately thought of small businesses, which I'm sure there will be a profit hierarchy to how much is shared.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
so you want to live in a country where the Government decides for each business how much of their profits are given to other people? Communist much?

So you want to live in a plutocracy where laborers are the ones who have to keep sacrificing less pay, less income, less benefits? Yea, those are fun.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
McCain and Romney were your perfect candidates. They lost...to a community organizer.
th

That'll work!
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,390
Tokens
I can't stand McCain. Romney was decent. What will your excuse be when/if Trump get his clock cleaned by a candidate with a net favorability of -15.

You boy Gary Johnson totally would have cleaned the witch's clock last night!


Why didn't the GOP nominate him??? Slam dunk!

:nohead:
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
You boy Gary Johnson totally would have cleaned the witch's clock last night!


Why didn't the GOP nominate him??? Slam dunk!

:nohead:

You might want to check my posts on Gary Johnson. He's a goof. I'm not voting for him because I think he's great and I know that he has no chance to win. That's the difference between you and I. I'm honest, you're dishonest.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,390
Tokens
You might want to check my posts on Gary Johnson. He's a goof. I'm not voting for him because I think he's great and I know that he has no chance to win. That's the difference between you and I. I'm honest, you're dishonest.

Nah, I think Gary's great, but he really should have laid off the pot for a LONG TIME before running for POTUS, don't you think?

I'm not dishonest at all, of the 16 candidates at the start of the primaries, Ted Cruz was head and shoulders above all others - by far the best debater in either party (if that sorta thing matters to people) and the most intelligent and qualified candidate in decades.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
You might want to check my posts on Gary Johnson. He's a goof. I'm not voting for him because I think he's great and I know that he has no chance to win. That's the difference between you and I. I'm honest, you're dishonest.
Oh you're honest alright, honestly stupid.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
Nah, I think Gary's great, but he really should have laid off the pot for a LONG TIME before running for POTUS, don't you think?

I'm not dishonest at all, of the 16 candidates at the start of the primaries, Ted Cruz was head and shoulders above all others - by far the best debater in either party (if that sorta thing matters to people) and the most intelligent and qualified candidate in decades.

Ya, it's crazy to me that he can't lay off the weed long enough to keep it together for media appearances.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,390
Tokens
Ya, it's crazy to me that he can't lay off the weed long enough to keep it together for media appearances.

Gary Johnson promises to lay off the weed as president

Campaign_2016_Johnson.JPEG-0dd6a_c0-285-3600-2383_s885x516.jpg


Libertarian presidential nominee and admitted marijuana user Gary Johnson has promised to lay off the substance if he’s elected president.

The former governor of New Mexico told The Hill during a Facebook Live interview Monday that he used marijuana recreationally “as recently as a month ago,” but he vowed to abstain for the rest of his campaign and during his presidency if he should win.

“The notion of getting that call at midnight or two o’clock — I think people need to really believe that there will be a firm voice on the other side,” he said.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/7/gary-johnson-promises-to-lay-off-the-weed-as-presi/

smoking-a-joint-smiley-emoticon.gif
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,130
Tokens
I don't have a problem with profit sharing plans, I frequently advise companies to establish them for a number of reasons, including AVOIDING TAXES

I do have a problem with a career politician thinking she has to make companies establish profit sharing plans, especially since it's nothing more than a talking point to her. As you can she, profit sharing is about wealth redistribution and buying votes to the fucking idiot. In the real world, profit sharing is about retirement savings, differing taxes, having more money work for you, retaining employees and rewarding employees.

My biggest problem with Hillary last night was her solution for solving our economic problems. "Increasing taxes on the wealthy and closing corporate loopholes (read increasing corporate taxes)"

How many times can the fucking idiots use that same failed strategy? How many times can they tell that same lie? How many times are people going to think all our problems can be solved AND somebody else is going to pay for it? When are the fucking idiots going to wake up? Will they ever wake up?

And then she says she knows it's businesses that create jobs, and we need to help them, BUTT all she proposes is more taxes and more regulations. Here's another clue for the clueless wonders, taxes and regulations do not help businesses to grow, taxes and regulations do not encourage investment, taxes and regulations do not encourage risk taking, taxes and regulations do not grow the economy, taxes and regulations are an economic anchor. Taxes and regulations are the reason why we're suffering though the worst extended period of economic malaise in recorded history.

One day, maybe, hopefully, one day a little ole common sense will prevail. Until then, I have to listen to all the fucking idiots telling us how they're going to fuck up the country even more.

They still haven't learned their lessons in all the poverty ridden and crime ridden and violent urban areas, they still elect the same democrats making the same promises for 50+ years and counting. Someday that may change
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
6,748
Tokens
I don't have a problem with profit sharing plans, I frequently advise companies to establish them for a number of reasons, including AVOIDING TAXES

Ya, I should clarify that I don't have any problem with them either. I have a problem with the government being the entity that makes that decision.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,130
Tokens
deferring taxes, not differing taxes
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,130
Tokens
Ya, I should clarify that I don't have any problem with them either. I have a problem with the government being the entity that makes that decision.

totally agree
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
I don't have a problem with profit sharing plans, I frequently advise companies to establish them for a number of reasons, including AVOIDING TAXES

I do have a problem with a career politician thinking she has to make companies establish profit sharing plans, especially since it's nothing more than a talking point to her. As you can she, profit sharing is about wealth redistribution and buying votes to the fucking idiot. In the real world, profit sharing is about retirement savings, differing taxes, having more money work for you, retaining employees and rewarding employees.

My biggest problem with Hillary last night was her solution for solving our economic problems. "Increasing taxes on the wealthy and closing corporate loopholes (read increasing corporate taxes)"

How many times can the fucking idiots use that same failed strategy? How many times can they tell that same lie? How many times are people going to think all our problems can be solved AND somebody else is going to pay for it? When are the fucking idiots going to wake up? Will they ever wake up?

And then she says she knows it's businesses that create jobs, and we need to help them, BUTT all she proposes is more taxes and more regulations. Here's another clue for the clueless wonders, taxes and regulations do not help businesses to grow, taxes and regulations do not encourage investment, taxes and regulations do not encourage risk taking, taxes and regulations do not grow the economy, taxes and regulations are an economic anchor. Taxes and regulations are the reason why we're suffering though the worst extended period of economic malaise in recorded history.

One day, maybe, hopefully, one day a little ole common sense will prevail. Until then, I have to listen to all the fucking idiots telling us how they're going to fuck up the country even more.

They still haven't learned their lessons in all the poverty ridden and crime ridden and violent urban areas, they still elect the same democrats making the same promises for 50+ years and counting. Someday that may change
As long as they keep getting elected.


White people are stupid and you can't fix stupid.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
5,490
Tokens
A govt-imposed "profit sharing plan for employees" - they're not even hiding anymore.

Why do you insist this be imposed by the "govt"? There are lots of employees benefiting in profit sharing without government impositions, mostly through stock options. Eliminate the government regulations that make it hard for some of us to negotiate those benefits (especially those who work for non-publicly traded companies) and both management and labor would be better off from more profit sharing
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
No, but their labor helped create the profits. No other way around that. One side sticks up for laborers, the other side sticks up for the executives. And given our 3rd world level disparity of wealth, I would say it's time we focus on laborers in this country. How any sane adult can hate laborers so much is beyond me. What you want, slave labor?



The business owners signing the front of the checks get paid last whereas those who sign the back of them don't need to worry about little details like making a payroll. As has been mentioned in here, should employees give money back to their company if they don't have a profitable year? Even multi-billion $ corps don't always turn a profit.

Let me ask, when you go to a restaurant...do you tip 100% of the bill? When you buy your firewater at the local 7-11, do you go tip the guy working behind the counter a $100 bill? When you pay your internet bill, do you pay 5x what you owe and instruct your ISP to give the remainder to their employees?

If not, why? Do you hate blue collar employees so much that you only want to pay the bare minimum for your goods and services?

Still quite the fucking alcohol-addled retard, aren't you?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,835
Messages
13,573,882
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com