CASH,
WHO ATTACKED WHO FIRST?
AND FOR WHAT REASON DID YOU EVEN FEEL LIKE ATTACKING ME?
SAME GOES WITH YOU TRUELY....YOU STARTED THIS RUMOR THAT I AM RELEASING BOTH SIDES OF A GAME...TO WHICH YOU KNOW FULL TRUTH THAT I AM NOT, NEVER HAVE, AND NEVER WILL EITHER....
YOU BETTER THINK MY FRIEND....
YOU WERE NEVER A CLIENT OF MINE AND YOU HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT I DO OR DONT DO ....WHEN IT COMES TO MY BUSINESS TO WHICH...YOUR ASSUMPTIONS ARE UNTRUTHFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY BEING PASSED ON BY YOU HERE, AS FACT....YOU FOR A FACT HAVE NO REAL PROOF OR TRUTHS BEHIND IT...AND THAT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO DO.
ASSUMPTIONS ARE NOT TRUTH, CASH...
KNOW CASH, THAT UNLIKE OTHERS WHO DO THIS FOR A HOBBY OR TO INTENTIONALLY SCAM OTHERS...THIS IS MY BUSINESS AND YOU ARE NOW FUCKING WITH SOMETHING THAT IS RUN IN A LEGIT MANNER AND HAS BEEN FOR SEVERAL YEARS....MANY HERE IN HAWAII AND FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS OVER THE NET....AND TO WHICH YOU AND THE OTHERS ARE NOW ON A WITCH HUNT USING ASSUMPTIONS, GUESSING AND NO PERSONAL TRUTHS AT ALL TO DO IT WITH...OR WHAT AND HOW I RUN MY BUSINESS....AND THUS YOU ARE DOING IT ALSO IN A MALICIOUS MANNER AND NOW TRYING TO RUIN WHAT MY REPUTATION...
AND THAT YOU WILL BE HELD LIABLE FOR....
If a person (individual, corporation, society, etc.) says (slander) or writes (libel) something damaging (not trivial) to the reputation of another person (individual, corporation, society, etc.) then the words are said to be defamatory. To be actionable, the words must be communicated to a third person.
Defamation concerns the reputation of a person.
Once words are communicated to a third party in writing or broadcast, and if they are damaging to a person’s reputation, the law makes three rebuttable presumptions:
(a) the words are false;
(b) the words are malicious (in the sense that the writer and publisher had no honest belief in the words and wrote them to achieve an undisclosed ulterior purpose or from grudge); and
(c) the words caused damage (that is, at least what lawyers call "general damages").