All Things Iv*rmectin, HCQ, Vit D, Vit C, Zinc and any other promising treatment options other than Vaccine

Search

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,011
Tokens
Mexico City got it right back in late December. Beginning on December 28, Ivermectin take home kits were sent home to positive and high risk. The study showed a reduction in hospitalizations by 52-76%. The U.S. of A still has no early treatment protocol. It's beyond criminal.

Mexico City Wide Innovative Population-Level Study Administers Ivermectin-based Home Kits with Drastic Reduction in Hospitalizations


https://trialsitenews.com/mexico-ci...s-with-drastic-reduction-in-hospitalizations/


E01-C3iXoAEngR0


That's a massive observational study. Shows less hospitalizations across all age groups. Another coincidence?

Huge results, huge study, control vs. active group. Cannot deny these numbers anymore.

Our CDC and FDA are corrupt to the core, in bed with the big pharma lobbyists.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,686
Tokens
Think.

With the CCP virus, there are potentially 7+ billion possible patients that get an injection once or twice a year, forever.

A few inexpensive, established, long-term-proven-effective medications were systematically shot down, harshly rejected, even destroyed by mass propaganda, and credible people that supported them were ridiculed and threatened.

Suddenly, several pharma companies were all able to get new vaccines to market in a few months with very little testing, RNA/DNAA, no problem. Were pregnant women tested, for example? Are pregnant women getting the vacciness?

Oh.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,495
Tokens
[h=1]Common asthma treatment reduces need for hospitalisation in COVID-19 patients, study suggests[/h][FONT=&quot]RESEARCHCORONAVIRUSHEALTH
[FONT=&quot]Early treatment with a medication commonly used to treat asthma appears to significantly reduce the need for urgent care and hospitalisation in people with COVID-19, researchers at the University of Oxford have found.
[/FONT]
The STOIC study found that inhaled budesonide given to patients with COVID-19 within seven days of the onset of symptoms also reduced recovery time. Budesonide is a corticosteroid used in the long-term management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Findings from the phase 2 randomised study, which was supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), were published on the medRxiv pre-print server.
The findings from 146 people – of whom half took 800 micrograms of the medication twice a day and half were on usual care – suggests that inhaled budesonide reduced the relative risk of requiring urgent care or hospitalisation by 90% in the 28-day study period. Participants allocated the budesonide inhaler also had a quicker resolution of fever, symptoms and fewer persistent symptoms after 28 days.
Professor Mona Bafadhel of the University’s Nuffield Department of Medicine, who led the trial, said: 'There have been important breakthroughs in hospitalised COVID-19 patients, but equally important is treating early disease to prevent clinical deterioration and the need for urgent care and hospitalisation, especially to the billions of people worldwide who have limited access to hospital care.
'The vaccine programmes are really exciting, but we know that these will take some time to reach everyone across the world. I am heartened that a relatively safe, widely available and well studied medicine such as an inhaled steroid could have an impact on the pressures we are experiencing during the pandemic.'
The study also demonstrated that there was a reduction in persistent symptoms in those who received budesonide. Prof Bafadhel, a Respiratory Consultant also working at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said: 'Although not the primary outcome of study, this is an important finding. I am encouraged to see the reduction in persistent symptoms at 14 and 28 days after treatment with budesonide. Persistent symptoms after the initial COVID-19 illness have emerged as a long-term problem. Any intervention which could address this would be a major step forward.'
The trial was inspired by the fact that, in the early days of the pandemic, patients with chronic respiratory disease, who are often prescribed inhaled steroids, were significantly under-represented among those admitted to hospital with COVID-19.
As well as the Oxford BRC, the STOIC trial was supported by AstraZeneca.

[/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
Strong treatment protocol implemented by India on 4/22/21

Fauci's early treatment plan 14 months after the pandemic.... stay home and hope you don't deteriorate. If you do, go to the hospital probably infecting others along the way then we are going to shoot you up with this EAU garbage called Remdisivir which is proven through large scale studies to be completely ineffective. Oh, and it might nuke your organs and cause you to die. But you if you don't die, we will send you a bill for $20k for hospital stay and garbage Remd treatment.

Anyone still supporting this Fraud, needs to be curb stomped.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
[h=1]How India can reduce Covid cases and deaths[/h]Vikas Sukhatme is the Dean of the School of Medicine at Emory University. The views expressed in this article are his personal views and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University.

India recently reported over 412,000 new Covid cases in a single day, a new world record. There is a simple way to dramatically reduce these numbers: instead of making all treatment recommendations based on the results of very large randomized controlled trials, broaden the evidence that can be considered in developing practice guidelines to also include smaller randomized trials which have been published in peer reviewed journals.

The broadening makes sense because Covid is best treated as soon as possible, but there are few drugs that have been proven in large trials. By expanding the range of drugs we consider to include those drugs with the next highest level of evidence, we will have more options to choose from.




The second thing to do differently is to judge the drugs on an equal basis to the “no treatment” option. We should be presenting patients with at least two options, treatment A and treatment B, and we should describe the results for each option, and let patients decide which treatment they prefer. One of these treatments should be the default “no treatment.” In this way, we allow patients to choose the option with the best outcome. The placebo no longer has an advantage but must compete on an equal footing with the drug.
Treatment with ivermectin and fluvoxamine

Once you make these two changes, you will find that both fluvoxamine and ivermectin rapidly rise to the top of the list in terms of effectiveness and safety. Both drugs should be given as early as possible (ideally before symptoms or as soon as possible after first symptoms) and at a sufficiently high enough dose and duration to be effective for the virus variants prevalent in India, which in this case would be 50 mg twice a day for fluvoxamine for 14 days and .4mg/kg per day for 7 days for ivermectin.


The evidence for both of these drugs is extremely compelling. The combination I described has been used with great success by dozens of doctors in India, many of whom say that the results are so profound that it is unethical not to use them. Conversely, none of my colleagues are able to explain how these results could be obtained if the drugs don’t work. For example, there have been 19 published studies of ivermectin with 177 authors covering 2,044 patients and 100% were positive with an average reduction in hospitalization of 80%.

svg xml;base64,PHN2ZyBoZWlnaHQ9JzM3Nycgd2lkdGg9JzY1NycgeG1sbnM9J2h0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDAvc3ZnJyB2ZXJzaW9uPScxLjEnLz4=
Pic-10-1.png

The Fluvoxamine is evidence similar, but there are fewer patients and studies. However, the results are astonishing with 100% reduction in hospitalization rate in the two published randomized studies compared to an 8.3% and 12.5% hospitalization/death rate for those who did not get the drug, respectively.
What is even more remarkable is that in the fluvoxamine study at Golden Gate Fields, none of the 77 patients treated with fluvoxamine developed any long-haul Covid symptoms compared to 60% of the patients in the no treatment group. Nobody can explain how, if the drug doesn’t work, how this could occur. The likelihood of it happening by chance is 1 in 10 14 , i.e., next to impossible.
Prevention using ivermectin
My final suggestion is that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. There are 14 studies with 108 authors and 8,789 patients showing an average reduction of hospitalization/death of 85% by taking ivermectin as a prophylaxis to prevent getting infected. Once again 100% of these studies are positive. If the drug doesn’t work, how can we explain the consistency here? These results were independently replicated by AIIMS which found a 73% reduction in the number of people infected. The suggested dose of ivermectin for prophylaxis is .2mg/kg taken once a week.


Treating Covid as early as possible means fewer drugs, lower dosing, and better patient outcomes. Preventing Covid with ivermectin is best, but if a patient is infected, treating “fast and hard” with a combination of ivermectin and fluvoxamine will reduce hospitalization and death rates by 90% or more based on the results on the real-world results hundreds of patients currently taking the combination.


As a world, our biggest challenge is no longer the virus. It is changing our thinking to adopt methods that are more likely to save lives than following the official protocols.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
48,553
Tokens
Bravo, hehateme.

Thanks for all the information you supply.

If I ever catch this dog I'm gonna know exactly how to instruct my doctor thanks to you.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,686
Tokens
Isn't India at war with China... they had an armed conflict several months ago, Indian soldiers were burned and killed with a new microwave like technology.

Suddenly, India has a gazillion virus cases... coincidence?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
16,012
Tokens
I took Ivermectim - but I think you are supposed to take it right when you get symptoms - I didnt take in until I had a fever for a week straight - but I did get better about 2-3 days after - hard to tell if it had run it's course or the Ivermectim helped - one thing for certain is it didnt hurt and it costs just about nothing
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
“Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin. In May-June 2020, a team at Agra, led by Dr Anshul Pareek, administered Ivermectin to all RRT team members in the district on an experimental basis. It was observed that none of them developed Covid-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus,” Uttar Pradesh State Surveillance Officer Vikssendu Agrawal said.

https://indianexpress.com/article/c...ivermectin-helped-to-keep-deaths-low-7311786/

E1NMgpxXMAEHdpm
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
The WHO even wrote a piece on May 7 complimenting Uttar Pradesh on their proactive approach but of course censoring the contents of the "medicine kit". The WHO is unable to say anything positive about any off patent therapeutic. It's fucking criminal.



From the article: "Each monitoring team has two members, who visit homes in villages and remote hamlets to test everyone with symptoms of COVID-19 using Rapid Antigen Tests (RAT) kits. Those who test positive are quickly isolated and given a medicine kit with advice on disease management. All the contacts of those who test positive are quarantined and tested using an RT-PCR at home by a rapid response team.Two mobile vans have been allocated to each Block within a District in the state to test people with symptoms, even as routine sample collection and testing continues in Community Health Centres.

https://www.who.int/india/news/feat...-pradesh-going-the-last-mile-to-stop-covid-19
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
E1MeFZFXIAQveE0



Mexico has vaccinated around 8% of their population. The U.S. is around 40%. Mexico should have more deaths right? Nah, they've been using ivermectin down there since December.

The data is in, the shit works.
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,273
Tokens
Oxford University study - 90% of hospitalisations for Covid could be prevented with early effective treatment with inhaled Budesonide
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
6,136
Tokens
E1WqLVIWEAMfVq1



More countries are adopting IVM + other cheap safe thereaputics take home kits for the recently infected or exposed.

The U.S. early treatment plan.... absolutely fucking nothing. 0. Nada. 14 months after. People should be hanged for this genocide.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,614
Messages
13,557,469
Members
100,652
Latest member
luckymeiseeghosts
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com