So what? The ones they want you to hear? I could care less dude. You continue to miss the point. I can’t help you understand what I’ve said over and over again. You have no interest in looking at it through an Independent lens. You’ve taken sides.
your side good other side bad.
I get it. Even though you’re wrong.
How am I missing the point?
You said “not a shred of evidence” exists, yet the transcript those recording immediately debunk that notion.
How is that being partisan? How is that being prejudiced?
I have said multiple times on this board that Trump will have his day in court , even though he doesn’t appear to be in a good situation
That is an independent viewpoint
People in this thread have been citing political scandals and saying that this is just another one, which is not true.
The DOJ doesn’t do political bullshit
Good lord.
Re-running an incumbent that already lost is bad business. Re-running him against the exact same opponent is pure stupidity.
With that said---won't matter as Trump will matter in the 2024 election as long as he is breathing which will be a YUGE downward drag on the GOP.
GOP only has a chance in 2024 presidential if Trump isn't in the primary and fades to background. GL to them.
Guess we will see
Maybe this time when he's winning by such an unreachable margin by the opponent at 1am in the morning that even Vegas had him as a massive favorite, the counts won't stop and suddenly an unrealistic miracle magically happens for the opponent overnight
Not that many votes
Anyone who was up that late and watched it all unfold knows something else went down
Even all of the sportsbooks had Trump at a massive favorite at that time/1 AM because of the ridiculous lead he had
Nothing is far-fetched these days, especially in politics
Once again Trump lead because he got states he viewed as battle ground to count same day first(he got a court order) and mail-ins not til last.
Remember when Biden was winning in Texas(no court order) because they counted the mail-ins(didn't wait til last) and some thought Biden was turning Texas blue and by end of the night Trump won Texas handily.
This selective memory is laughable. I mean 2004 Kerry went from +300 to -300 over just exit counting. Obviously Bush won rather easily.
The Vegas lines are horrible with this...Trump never had a "lead" it was simply based on what got counted first over court orders.
This is around the same as betting an under in a basketball game and delacring ur "winning" by 240 points and than delcaring them to "stop!" at half time because ur 240 point "lead" is shrinking.
Obviously he had leads to even massive leads if u force states to initially selectively count.
This isn't exactly hard to understand.
Obviously he had leads to even massive leads if u force states to initially selectively count.
This isn't exactly hard to understand.
For someone who is somewhat witty, you are easily fooled in many things
