Thanks FZ , OK so yeah maybe the nba has nothing to do with it. i suppose if we researched the baby to baby mama ratio of employees @ a walmart in Gary Indiana or East St.louis I would come to the same false conclusion. That is if i understand you correctly which i am not certain i do definatly you are way more accomplish scholar and perhaps thinker than me lol.. the ways of the world is more my strength
You understood him perfectly metro, your response was On Point. You underestimate yourself, you sell yourself short metro. You're easily on this dude Zit's level just the two of you use different words, speak a slightly different language metro. same as people you encounter in the streets. Give yourself a bit of credit from time to time metro. You deserve this. Dealing with a Word Guy such as Zit as would be true of people you deal with in your day to day life who may speak in a different way its good to try and "speak their language", you know what I mean metro, communicate to them in terms that they can understand and better communication is accomplished. For example, using Zit as an example metro:
Reply a 2nd time to his causation doesn't imply causation post in Zit's language metro. Tell him the counter-assumption is that correlation proves causation with the example that Identifying that the reasoning behind an argument is flawed does not imply that the resulting conclusion is false.
Its the same thing you said metro just in different words, in Zit's Language. Copy and paste the following into a re-reply to his post and see if he has any comeback to this metro. He won't because what he did was try to use an assumption to try and slide on through like he is all slick or something but his choice to employ an assumption left him wide open, vulnerable like he has a collapsed Offensive line, in using that assumption he left himself wide open, defenseless really metro.
What you're going to do here metro, in your re-reply My Brother, is hit Zit with the Counter-assumption to his assumption and once you do that theres really no decent comeback he can make to it so....copy and paste this into your re-reply and hit send and lets knock this fool Zit out the ring metro.
Together mah brotha.
(copy and past whats after this parentheses metro in you re-reply to Zit)
Yeah right Zit. The Counter-Assumption to that being that correlation proves causation proves that Identifying that the reasoning behind an argument is flawed does not imply that the resulting conclusion is false. So step back Jack. Boom. (Mic Drop.)
