"Active Account"

[jjgold]

Banned4Life I have money in about 23 books, some of it I called old money, jut leave it in but do not play there now, kind like inactive. Why take it out if it is chump change and who knows I might go back there especially if they change their software, kind of cheapish and very confusing to read line screens.

Banned4Life good luck to you and the people in your neighborhood.

 

[assassin]

Hey this sounds like a great idea for the sportsbook I was going to open.

20% deposit bonus
Fees covered for all deposits
Bonusses Earned if account remains INACTIVE
Additional 10% bonus earned for each inactive month
50% additional bonus for 6 consectutive inactive months
25% refereal bonus, upon referal account remaining INACTIVe for 60 days
To cover our expenses, withdrawl fees will be equivalent the withdrawl amount requested

 

[SPIVE]

I know the feeling about having chump-change in an old account for years.

Then a couple a months ago, I found that these places were still in business (surprised) and had my balance, some had to go to archives to retrieve the figure, since they changed software over the years...then I just simply scalped out the balance.

At one joint I won 8 or 9 in a row pushing the wagering limit until it finally was TBR'd.


Note: TBR = Torched Beyond Recognition.

 

JJ doesn't have a clue about himself.

JJ posted in the 5 dimes thread, although he says he didn't read it.

JJ's idea of "active" is as accurate as his other fantasies. Once a month JJ, where's your proof?

JJ recently was calling 5 dimes one of the top 5 books in the world. Thats right, "TOP FIVE IN THE WORLD". Yep, got proof of that.

As you can see from his drivel above he has dropped them off his top 5 list, same software, same owners, and customer policies as they had when they were "top 5".

Guess they stopped paying JJ to post.

When JJ says he's got money there, it means he tapped out, and has money there still, but not enough to make a bet.

CHUMP!!!! Still waitiing for you to answer with proof in the last thread.

 

[SPIVE]

Having a dislike for banks, I have always left less than a dollar in the account when discontinuing its activity.

Just the postage costs of them sending me monthly statements for years brings me pleasure.

 

[jjgold]

megladon I pump more money into sportsbooks per week than you bet in 6 months, when your on my level talk to me.

I have always said 5 dimes is great but do not do much business there for various reasons and have gone on record suggesting software upgrades for the book. You know this industry is so unpredicatable, one week good one bad, ect.

 

In the unlikely event I become "on your level" I will be seeking professional help, not coming to talk to you, the thought of which is hilarious unto itself.

Can you back up anything, I mean ANYTHING you say? If not you may have to be sent down from this triple AAA ball to wagertalk.


BTW, Hear you're in a very long and deep betting slump, from your own posts, would you like me to cut and paste them.

 

[UncleButternutts]

megladon

~Poster of the Month~
May 2003

 

[jjgold]

Yes I am in a big time slump but like a jerkoff I keep sending the plays in, I will break out hopefull soon, yes I am chasing.

Don't demote me to wagertalk, I hate that site.

Good Luck

 

[Banned4Life]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Banned4Life good luck to you and the people in your neighborhood. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I'll take the good luck but the neighborhood can get rotten luck for all I care. One side the fukkin dog barks all the time, anytime of the day or night. The other side the rotten kids are always kicking soccer balls against my car. I wish I didn't have to have neighbors at all.

 

Banned for life, keep up the good work, tell it like it is brother.

JJ, not about to leave you alone.

_you trash an honest bettor like IWIN ORDIE, without showing a shred of evidence, taking the side of a bad book like sia.

_you trash escrow accounts, one of the things which will move this industry forward, taking the side of the bad books.

_you trash Cascade, a book which as done nothing but pay bettors throughout attempts by stinking lousy agenda ridden bettors to beat them, taking the side of bad bettors.

_you trash Allworld, one of the few books trying to pull the industry forward, taking the side of bad books.

_you are now trashing 5 dimes, another solid paying book.

I'm on to your scam, and didn't bother you in your bonus whoring ways when you were just pumping good books, but now that you've moved to extortion, I'm bringing a dildo so big even you can't handle it.


Bend over, the bettors are about to get payback.

Tell strut.

 

Oh yeah, Butternuts, be careful, I have read between your lines, and see you are much too honest for your job. Don't let the shrink catch you backing up guys like me, I cost money in advertising.

Thank you for letting me post, best to leave it at that.

 

[UncleButternutts]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Oh yeah, Butternuts, be careful, I have read between your lines, and see you are much too honest for your job. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I like to think that is why i was hired...

 

[Halifax]

"_you trash an honest bettor like IWIN ORDIE, without showing a shred of evidence, taking the side of a bad book like sia."
-------------------------

megladon:

As I recall, IWINORDIE could hardly be called an honest bettor. He/they may have been treated harshly with the confiscation of funds, but I thought it was apparent to most that there was some funny stuff going on with multiple accounts.

Maybe I missed something on the issue, but I seem to remember reading about it for several hours in total. If my memory is wrong, point me in the direction where I can see that he was an honest bettor.

 

Hal- this isn't about IWIN, its about a pattern by JJ, overwhelming evidence, of him siding with bad books, trashing good books, and refusing to provide one scintilla of evidence to back his a*s up.

If you'd also like to back up sia in the aformentioned matter, realize you are backing a book which refused to provide one iota of evidence backing their claims, much like JJ. You have evidence IWIN was cheating, bring it on, otherwise clam up, innocent until proven guilty.

 

[Halifax]

"You have evidence IWIN was cheating, bring it on, otherwise clam up, innocent until proven guilty."
------------------------------------

You claim to be the one "in the know" here - I was asking you to point me in the direction of some useful details, but all you give me is "..bring it on, otherwise clam up". Geez, you sound like jj.

My memory is admittedly hazy, as it was back in October when I actually read all this stuff.

Obviously, asking me for "proof" is kinda stupid on your part, since everyone knows only IWIN and/or SIA could supply any "proof". Barring any proof, the rational viewer has to look at what is presented by both parties. I seem to recall that multiple identical bets were placed from multiple accounts, all with the same IP address, all at basically the same time. I don't think IWIN denied this, I think he said he had multiple friends or relatives who had accounts. Well, barring any proof, these occurences tell me that, for all intents and purposes, IWIN was "in control" of multiple accounts.

I don't necessarily agree that ALL of the money should have been confiscated, but you steadfastly saying that IWIN was an "honest bettor" leaves your own credibility somewhat in doubt.

[This message was edited by Halifax on May 20, 2003 at 12:56 AM.]

 

[Ms.Thing]

thanx for all the feedback...

I guess it's a personal opinion depending on who it comes from. A book might say an active account is one that plays twice a day, a wise guy might say once a month (as long as it's the required rollover)

Personally, 4 to 5 bets a week sounds active enough to be an active customer...

 

[jjgold]

megladon you seem a little inexperienced having to do with posting forums and try to twist things do to you being insecure. No one has proof if a book is good or bad, that might be one of the most dummiest things you have ever said. Forums are about opinions, not proof, this is not a court of law, we are not attorneys, are you??? You or I can question anyone's posts and ask for proof, so silly guy. I never trashed 5 dimes at all, I said I keep my funds low there, that is not trashing a book and I am starting to see more posts about them about bad customer service and bad attitudes.

Your only defense in posts is to ask for proof, common guy your giving yourself away here and trying to attack me all the time is showing just how immature you are. Your act is getting old and I have a feeling your not going to last here, go to the rubber room if you want to fight.

I hear your barreled in from gambling by some good sources, do I have proof??? No guy but no need for it this is a posting forum and lots of my opinions are very accurate. Other stuff I do have proof but cannot give up my sources offshore.

Good Luck

 

[Banned4Life]

JJgold's offshore source revealed:

 

Hal-

IWIN repeatedly and I mean REPEATEDLY asked sia to post his betting records, to post the commisions decision. He asked again and again to defend his postion and was never given a chance. In addition he went to every offshore arbitrator he could to gain some type of judgement, but sia and the kawankee commision refused to release any records.

So tell me big guy, how do you jump from that to concluding he's guilty. How do you side with a book which won't bring the facts to light vs. a bettor who's begging for the evidence to be revealed?

I personally found his explanations to be quite plausible, particularly since he lives in a part of the world where computers are rare, and household occupancy is much greater.

However, the point is not IWIN in this thread, as I mentioned before, the point is JJ trashed this guy high and low, was repeatedly asked for any type of evidence, or how he reached his conclusion, and had none to give. He sided with a book who refused to release evidence, and made a conclusion without all the facts present. Using facts which only sia released.
````````````````````

JJ what the hell does the following mean?

"I hear your barreled in from gambling by some good sources"

Regarding your other barely legible statements, its all about proof. You run around saying stupid things without backing yourself up, and claim hidden sources. How foolish is that?

My claims about you can and have all been backed up. I have evidence for everything I say. You have posts which suppost all of my above suppositions, trashing ordie, cascade, allworld, trust accounts, etc..

And there's more, so much more....

So while you think anyone gives a rats ass about your opinions, fact is, its about the facts.

Better get back to miss cleo about my inexperience, apparently her vision failed to to see my sign up date here.