A. Luck is 10-0 SU and ATS after coming off a loss in his NFL career.

Search

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
The only stat I take and use religiously on whether to be on a side or no play is the public number. NE,Denver,SF,NO,GB, Tampa,Seattle, Detroit, and Pittsburgh were all bet by public at over 67%. Record going against public on these games were 8-1. Indy at 72% public. You do the math.

Sooo if I play all plays against the public number i will be ahead?
 

Dain Bramaged
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
16,155
Tokens
Here's one for you stat guys
The Eagles are 0-15 on the road against playoff-bound AFC teams, with those 15 losses coming by an average of 17.7 points. If you count a neutral-site game — the Super Bowl — they’re 0-16.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
The only stat I take and use religiously on whether to be on a side or no play is the public number. NE,Denver,SF,NO,GB, Tampa,Seattle, Detroit, and Pittsburgh were all bet by public at over 67%. Record going against public on these games were 8-1. Indy at 72% public. You do the math.

And if the only stat you take and use regularly on whether or not to be on a side or not why did you take Detroit? Honest question.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
Indi covers. People want to think they are sharp because they pick a dog. Lmao
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
1,592
Tokens
Colts/Andrew Luck is 10-0 SU & 10-0 ATS after SU loss in his career

Everytime one of the AMAZING stats come along

BOOM.......It blows up

Just sayin'
 

.......
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
14,511
Tokens
If you read my thread, I cap the game before looking at any trends or anything in regards to public. I made point that I lost Detroit and it was a public play as I believed in what I capped to be true. Public usually increases or decreases my bet or altogether makes it a no play. One of about 10 angles (public being only trend or numbers I use). Everyone has a system they follow, that is mine. Hope that clarifies it for you.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
If you read my thread, I cap the game before looking at any trends or anything in regards to public. I made point that I lost Detroit and it was a public play as I believed in what I capped to be true. Public usually increases or decreases my bet or altogether makes it a no play. One of about 10 angles (public being only trend or numbers I use). Everyone has a system they follow, that is mine. Hope that clarifies it for you.

Makes sense. So do you think if a person bets against the public they will win more games?
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
If you read my thread, I cap the game before looking at any trends or anything in regards to public. I made point that I lost Detroit and it was a public play as I believed in what I capped to be true. Public usually increases or decreases my bet or altogether makes it a no play. One of about 10 angles (public being only trend or numbers I use). Everyone has a system they follow, that is mine. Hope that clarifies it for you.

I read your thread yesterday around 11am I believe. Fwiw
 

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
47,388
Tokens
If you read my thread, I cap the game before looking at any trends or anything in regards to public. I made point that I lost Detroit and it was a public play as I believed in what I capped to be true. Public usually increases or decreases my bet or altogether makes it a no play. One of about 10 angles (public being only trend or numbers I use). Everyone has a system they follow, that is mine. Hope that clarifies it for you.
Again....what site do you use for the %'s?
 

.......
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
14,511
Tokens
Use sports options and covers but the paid sports options is better. I do believe going against public is good. I have started tracking it for myself. Line for me is 65% and above to go against public.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
The only stat I take and use religiously on whether to be on a side or no play is the public number. NE,Denver,SF,NO,GB, Tampa,Seattle, Detroit, and Pittsburgh were all bet by public at over 67%. Record going against public on these games were 8-1. Indy at 72% public. You do the math.

This is what got me to respond btw. You make it sound like its that easy and it's not.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
12,822
Tokens
Btw I read your thread yesterday because I've been here a while and know you're a good capper. Not trying to bust your balls just trying to get a sense of where your coming from.
 

.......
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
14,511
Tokens
Making the point on week 2 for this week. Understand how you could take that. I also for years have tracked opening lines for same purpose. Has worked well for me. Trying to always refine and sharpen my system to narrow down card, get off games, or know when to pound. Hope this helps.
 

.......
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
14,511
Tokens
Have a group of 3 of us that talks weekly to openly discuss games to see others angles. The others are two of the best I have known for years.
 

Banned
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
16,565
Tokens
Colts/Andrew Luck is 10-0 SU & 10-0 ATS after SU loss in his career

Everytime one of the AMAZING stats come along

BOOM.......It blows up

Just sayin'

Yesterdays stat 27-3 ATS that was on San Diego sure blew up. Didn't it.
 

Banned
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
16,565
Tokens
Kojak or anyone do you wait about 30 minutes before the game starts to fade the public and over 65 % is that on the ML or ATS you want
to look at. Does it work with totals also. The same way.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,542
Tokens
Yesterdays stat 27-3 ATS that was on San Diego sure blew up. Didn't it.

btw, i couldn't recreate that at all. i know the newsletter it came from and the parameters but his 27-3 was quite a bit off. it was a nice winning system but not 27-3....he does that a lot which is actually one reason why i started learned the sdql. i love his stuff but it's not usually 100% accurate.
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,542
Tokens
Wow he's a cheater. Lol. Yes from a newsletter I read.

he comes up with great ideas so i read him and statfox every week to come up with things to expand on. just his numbers are a little fudged in his favor normally...that's all

his NFL one this week up top was really far off but i reworked it into something that was pretty impressive and showed STL as a great play
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
11,343
Tokens
ANDREW FUCKIN' LUCK!!!!! Forget all the anti-public BS and over thinking...look what he did in the first half giving his team the lead without his arm and using his audibles!!! Kid is a fuckin' stud, never bet against him off a loss until he losses one of these. Until then keep cashing these easy Indy covers off a loss. Whoever posted this stat, thanks for helping people make money tonight. For those on the Eagles at least you NOW know not to bet against the Colts off a loss with the stud Luck at the helm!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,663
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com