I got rained out at work today so I watched all the episodes online today... Must say that was the best 30 for 30 I've ever seen... The whole time I'm watching it I just felt like fuck this dude, what a pos, but I couldn't stop watching. The fact the jury let him off the hook to get white American back for Rodney King is just baffling
I came away thinking OJ's lawyers were almost as much pieces of shit as he is. Cochran was willing to destroy many people's lives in order to free a man he knew deep down was guilty as hell.
Darden's and Marcia Clark's lives were never the same, the families of the murdered were crushed by the verdict. Fuhrman's life was destroyed. Gil Garcetti as well...
I was going to comment on the defense team anyway.
I'm fully supportive of the idea of an aggressive defense and using whatever legal strategy you feel is appropriate and ethical. But turning this guy into a "black man of the street" knowing it is completely fake and will sway the blacks on the jury is kind of sick.
I mean, OJ's defense lawyers not only sought to slander the police department, mislead the public, and inflame racial tensions, they did this thinking it was ok because some black men had been treated unfairly by the justice system. These guys did not care that two people were killed, they only used the frame of race to mount a defense.
If the two victims were black, would they have tried the same thing?
I really don't know those guys slept at night after the verdict and I'd have no problem taking a lead pipe to this Carl Douglas guy's head. What a disgusting human being he is sitting there all smug justifying what they did because of Watts and Rodney King.
Absolutely amazing documentary. I almost didn't watch the rest of it after the boring part 1. Part 2-5 were excellent. I didn't realize all the stupid shit OJ did to make money after the trial.
I also can't wait for the next 30 for 30...Doc and Darryl. My fav baseball players growing up as a kid. The original Coke boys. Should be another classic.
I was going to comment on the defense team anyway.
I'm fully supportive of the idea of an aggressive defense and using whatever legal strategy you feel is appropriate and ethical. But turning this guy into a "black man of the street" knowing it is completely fake and will sway the blacks on the jury is kind of sick.
I mean, OJ's defense lawyers not only sought to slander the police department, mislead the public, and inflame racial tensions, they did this thinking it was ok because some black men had been treated unfairly by the justice system. These guys did not care that two people were killed, they only used the frame of race to mount a defense.
If the two victims were black, would they have tried the same thing?
I really don't know those guys slept at night after the verdict and I'd have no problem taking a lead pipe to this Carl Douglas guy's head. What a disgusting human being he is sitting there all smug justifying what they did because of Watts and Rodney King.
I know the doc was trying to be ultra-serious and observant about LA and culture in general so it didn't want to broach a less serious topic, but they should've had some talk about what Goldman and Nicole's relationship was. They just went with the basic "He was bringing her mother's sunglasses back" when they were known to hangout together and be good friends. Goldman would drive her Ferrari sometimes when they would go to LA hot spots. They were a lot more than acquaintances at the very least.
Here is a decent old LA Times article about Goldman and his relationship with Nicole.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-oj-anniv-goldman-story.html
Amazing, that's the first I have heard in all these years that Goldman had a relationship w/ Nicole, even if it was just friends.
Shapiro said afterwards that he would never work with Cochran or Bailey again and indicated he wasn't a fan of their tactics. Those guys are cutthroat lawyers and they knew that OJ had no real path to victory other than playing up the past of the LAPD and race relations in LA.
I thought Ito came out avoiding criticism for all of this way more than he should've, he was the judge. He shouldn't have allowed the case to be a referendum on the last 25 years of Los Angeles law enforcement but rather about a man killing two people. He just had no control over the court room. Even in the documentary, he really doesn't get nearly enough blame for his incompetence.