You gun control nuts should be taken out back and shot.
Sigh. Of course. It's ACCIDENTAL!!! Why do you think are called car accidents and shootings are not called mass accidents?
So as car makers and consumers try to make cars safer.....don't you think making guns safer is something we might wanna look in to?
Comparing this incident and gun incidents is borderline retarded and I'm not sure how you don't see it.
How about these terms.....Michigan State should never punt again because of their one incident against Michigan. I'm trying anything to get you to understand this extremely simple concept. The stupidity of comparisons is mind boggling.
Okay, what should we do about people getting killed by cars, whether intentional or accidental?
Accident is accident.....it really doesn't even belong in the discussion. Considering we aren't talking about mass gun accidents. But just to humor myself....keep doing what we are doing. Make cars safer, which millions are spent doing just that, keep some of the great driving programs for seniors....such as 55 alive safe driving classes that are covered by insurance.
The intentional car crash, which is very rare....all you can do is make the car safer. But the reason you don't see mass purposeful killing with an automobile is because the most damage can be done with a weapon that can kill mass amounts of people in the quickest time. You think it's easier for people to dodge a bullet or a car? Which one is faster? Why do you think 4 people were killed and others were injured? How many you think die if that girl had a semi automatic? 20 or 30? Surely you have to see this comparison is silly.
This entire discussion is idiotic and embarrassing.
You're ignoring the massive similarities. Whether the deaths are accidental or not, you still have dead bodies lying around, and many more dead bodies are due to cars than guns.Accident is accident.....it really doesn't even belong in the discussion. Considering we aren't talking about mass gun accidents. But just to humor myself....keep doing what we are doing. Make cars safer, which millions are spent doing just that, keep some of the great driving programs for seniors....such as 55 alive safe driving classes that are covered by insurance.
The intentional car crash, which is very rare....all you can do is make the car safer. But the reason you don't see mass purposeful killing with an automobile is because the most damage can be done with a weapon that can kill mass amounts of people in the quickest time. You think it's easier for people to dodge a bullet or a car? Which one is faster? Why do you think 4 people were killed and others were injured? How many you think die if that girl had a semi automatic? 20 or 30? Surely you have to see this comparison is silly.
This entire discussion is idiotic and embarrassing.
You're ignoring the massive similarities. Whether the deaths are accidental or not, you still have dead bodies lying around, and many more dead bodies are due to cars than guns.
Uh Oh. now they are saying that she swerved around the barricades and intentionally hit those people.
You fucking car nuts need to get a clue.
Nailed it. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
The final result is the most important. People aren't finding solace because their loved one is dead due to an accident. The biggest difference is that liberals can't use his case to push their gun control agenda.Again, the comparison is silly. I've tried to explain it to you and make it simple enough fg for you to grasp. You've already reached your own odd conclusion and nothing is gonna change that. There are no "massive similarities" other than the final result. You really need to think about the word accident and the term on purpose.