2010 mlb capping & betting #102 - daily key info plus q&a

[presscoverage]

k, got it and put it into the master and got the same results 9-7 as you said

i assume you already have it in the 2009 as a pivot table. what are the numbers if you filter the pivot table and only do april?

if it's the same as this year might only be an early season thing as this year april are almost as high as the entire 2009 number

tks

p.s. but the idea is good. that is the type of thing that many should be looking for

April 2009: 0-3 -300

 

[pops69]

April 2009: 0-3 -300

wow. big diff, so not an april thing. it's in the pdws and master so we'll see said the blind man

like my pappy said, ride it till it dies

tks

p.s. i've put the pivot for it in with TWJD and just added PC Dog to the tab

 

[patswin]

pops check your commisions at matchbook, saw this today

http://www.peepsplace.com/showthread.php?t=266557

 

[pops69]

when i added the 2 dh games i found a error in the zen so here's what they are for today

zen 2 sfo un
zen 5 minn un

 

[IrishTim]

can one of you excel guru's post how to calculate a no vig money line? I have one set up but want to confirm its correct.

Suppose you have Boston -192 and Texas +180, here is how to get the no-vig line. Now you can find the implied winning percentage of a team whose line is negative by taking the absolute value of the number and dividing it by that number plus 100.

So Boston's implied winning percentage would be 192/(192+100) so 192/292 = .6575 and then you multiply that by 100 to convert the decimal to a percentage, so according to Pinnacle's line, Boston has a 65.75% chance of winning the game.

For teams with a price greater than zero (i.e. +101 or more) you determine the implied winning percentage by dividing 100 by the line plus 100.

So Texas' implied win percentage would be 100/(180+100) which is 100/280 = .3571 or 35.71%.

So according to Pinny's lines, the implied winning percentages are as follows:

Boston: 65.75%
Texas: 35.71%

Now the problem is that when you add these percentages, you get a number over 100%. Obviously this is a problem, as when you only have two possible events, the respective probabilities must add up to exactly 100% (or 1 in decimal form).

This small percentage over 100% is what is called the overround which in practical terms, is the book's theoretical hold percentage. That is, this is what % of every dollar wagered that the book would make ("hold") if there was equal action on both sides. It's theoretical because of course there won't always be exactly equal action.

In our case, 65.75% + 35.71% = 101.46% so Pinnacle can expect to make 1.46% of every dollar wagered. You'll see other full-juice books with a significantly higher expected hold, but Pinnacle makes up for this with their incredible volume. They take $30k on an NFL side where other books will only take $5k. This is the primary reason why their lines are so efficient (accurate) - because they cater to sharps with reduced juice, early lines, and high limits. So they have the sharpest bettors shaping their markets.

But obviously there is a problem with analyzing winning percentages that have the books hold (the vig) factored in to it. What we are after are the true probabilities of an event occurring, which we determine by the zero-vig line.

The way to factor out the book's hold is to divide each implied win percentage by the sum of the two implied winning percentages.

Boston: 65.75/101.46 = .6480 or 64.80%
Texas: 35.71/101.46 = .3520 or 35.20%

As you can see, 64.80% + 35.20% add up to exactly 100%. So these are the true or zero-vig probabilities of each team winning, according to Pinnacle's markets.

In a line: you calculate the zero-vig win probabilities by dividing each implied win percentage by the sum of the two WPs.

Now to go from the no-vig win percentages back to a no-vig line, you use the following equations, with P = no-vig win percentage in decimal form

*if the win probability is greater than 50% (decimal > 0.5):
-100/[(1/P)-1]

*if the win probability is less than 50% (decimal < 0.5):
[(1/P)-1] x 100

So for Boston, who has a no-vig WP of 64.80% it would be:
-100/[(1/0.648)-1] = -184.1

For Texas, whose no-vig WP was 35.20%:
[(1/0.352)-1] x 100 = +184.1

So the no-vig line is -184/+184.

 

[pops69]

Suppose you have Boston -192 and Texas +180, here is how to get the no-vig line. Now you can find the implied winning percentage of a team whose line is negative by taking the absolute value of the number and dividing it by that number plus 100.

So Boston's implied winning percentage would be 192/(192+100) so 192/292 = .6575 and then you multiply that by 100 to convert the decimal to a percentage, so according to Pinnacle's line, Boston has a 65.75% chance of winning the game.

For teams with a price greater than zero (i.e. +101 or more) you determine the implied winning percentage by dividing 100 by the line plus 100.

So Texas' implied win percentage would be 100/(180+100) which is 100/280 = .3571 or 35.71%.

So according to Pinny's lines, the implied winning percentages are as follows:

Boston: 65.75%
Texas: 35.71%

Now the problem is that when you add these percentages, you get a number over 100%. Obviously this is a problem, as when you only have two possible events, the respective probabilities must add up to exactly 100% (or 1 in decimal form).

This small percentage over 100% is what is called the overround which in practical terms, is the book's theoretical hold percentage. That is, this is what % of every dollar wagered that the book would make ("hold") if there was equal action on both sides. It's theoretical because of course there won't always be exactly equal action.

In our case, 65.75% + 35.71% = 101.46% so Pinnacle can expect to make 1.46% of every dollar wagered. You'll see other full-juice books with a significantly higher expected hold, but Pinnacle makes up for this with their incredible volume. They take $30k on an NFL side where other books will only take $5k. This is the primary reason why their lines are so efficient (accurate) - because they cater to sharps with reduced juice, early lines, and high limits. So they have the sharpest bettors shaping their markets.

But obviously there is a problem with analyzing winning percentages that have the books hold (the vig) factored in to it. What we are after are the true probabilities of an event occurring, which we determine by the zero-vig line.

The way to factor out the book's hold is to divide each implied win percentage by the sum of the two implied winning percentages.

Boston: 65.75/101.46 = .6480 or 64.80%
Texas: 35.71/101.46 = .3520 or 35.20%

As you can see, 64.80% + 35.20% add up to exactly 100%. So these are the true or zero-vig probabilities of each team winning, according to Pinnacle's markets.

In a line: you calculate the zero-vig win probabilities by dividing each implied win percentage by the sum of the two WPs.

Now to go from the no-vig win percentages back to a no-vig line, you use the following equations, with P = no-vig win percentage in decimal form

*if the win probability is greater than 50% (decimal > 0.5):
-100/[(1/P)-1]

*if the win probability is less than 50% (decimal < 0.5):
[(1/P)-1] x 100

So for Boston, who has a no-vig WP of 64.80% it would be:
-100/[(1/0.648)-1] = -184.1

For Texas, whose no-vig WP was 35.20%:
[(1/0.352)-1] x 100 = +184.1

So the no-vig line is -184/+184.

nice job of explaining this in simple terms

 

[IrishTim]

I tried my best. It's easier to just plug in to the spreadsheet and let excel work its magic. If for whatever reason, it won't let you put in the American odds (i.e. keeps converting them to a decimal), just put a decimal at the end. So if you want to put in -190, enter "-190.0" or something.

On another note - you don't keep NBA data, do you pops? There are some things I want to check.

 

[cigar]

Here's how you do it, I believe, converting odds to decimal points. I can whip up a better excel spreadsheet tonight when I have more time.

(DOG + 1)/(FAVE + 1) x FAVE = amount to bet on fave per $1 bet on dog.

So for, example given with BOS -110 and NYY +120, it would look like:

(1.2 + 1) x 1.1 = $1.152
(1.1 + 1)

If you risked $100 on BOS at -110, you'd want to risk $86.78 ($100 divided by $1.152) on NY at +120.

Tim, could you still whip up this spread sheet? I'd appreciate it.

 

[IrishTim]

Shit, I forgot about that cigar. I'm working on another project right this minute but I'll try to get to it before I go to sleep. Send me a PM tomorrow if I don't post it. Thanks, bud.

 

[patswin]

thanks tim i appreciate it. i think i did my current one i use in excel from what you posted on eog a few months back but i think i messed something up cause i get goofy numbers on large spreads, ie fav -750 dog +600 type lines

 

[IrishTim]

No problem, Pats. Did this one work for you?

That's how you do the math, but I very well may have made a mistake with the logic in excel. As the guys in this thread know, I'm no excel expert.

 

[pops69]

I tried my best. It's easier to just plug in to the spreadsheet and let excel work its magic. If for whatever reason, it won't let you put in the American odds (i.e. keeps converting them to a decimal), just put a decimal at the end. So if you want to put in -190, enter "-190.0" or something.

On another note - you don't keep NBA data, do you pops? There are some things I want to check.

no nba this year. ctp might have one though

 

[twjd]

Money Line Converter Instructions

<TABLE class=data border=0 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=5><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD class=mbt bgColor=#ecece4 width="50%">To convert winning probability into a money line:
Say you've done your homework and you've decided that Team A has a 58.5% chance of winning their game.
Enter 58.5 into the box marked Win % and press the button marked % --> Line.
Presto! Now you can compare the number that appears in the "Line" box (-40.9) and see if you've got an edge on the actual money line.

</TD><TD class=mbt bgColor=#ecece4 width="50%">To convert a money line into winning probability:
Say you're looking at a -178 money line and would like to see what kind of chances your book is giving this team.
Enter -178 into the box marked Line and press the button marked % <-- Line.
Presto! Now you can compare the number that appears in the "Win %" box (64%) and see if you've got an edge on the actual money line.
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#ecece4 colSpan=2 align=middle><SCRIPT language=JavaScript type=text/javascript><!-- Lou's Baseball Line Convertor JavaScript -->// Created by Joe MacDonald// Copyright CSI, 1997function CalcLine(form)** if (Check(form.Percent) && Check(form.Line)) ** p1 = parseFloat(form.Percent.value); v1 = parseFloat(form.Line.value); if (p1 < 0) ** p1 = -p1; form.Percent.value = p1; } if (p1 > 50) v1 = -(p1 * 100) / (100 - p1); else if (p1 < 50) ** p1 = 100 - p1; v1 = ((p1 * 100) / (100 - p1)); } else v1 = 100; form.Line.value = v1; } else form.Percent.value = 'Error';}function CalcPercent(form)** if (Check(form.Percent) && Check(form.Line)) ** p1 = parseFloat(form.Percent.value); v1 = parseFloat(form.Line.value); if (v1 < 0) ** v1 = -v1; p1 = v1 / (v1 + 100); form.Percent.value = p1 * 100; } else ** p1 = v1 / (v1 + 100) * 100; form.Percent.value = 100 - p1; } } else form.Percent.value = 'Error';}function Check(infield)** flag = 0; var str = infield.value; for ( i = 0; i < str.length; i++) ** var chr = str.substring(i, i+1); if (((chr < "0") || (chr > "9")) && (chr != ".") && (chr != "-") && (chr != "+")) flag = 1; } if ((flag == 1) || (str.length == 0)) ** infield.value = 'Error'; return false;} else return true;}function clearForm(form)** form.Percent.value = "0"; form.Line.value = "0";}<!-- End of Script --></SCRIPT>
<TABLE class=smtext border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 bgColor=#000066><FORM method="post"><TBODY><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD colSpan=3>Moneyline Converter

</TD></TR><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD class=mbt align=middle>Win %</TD><TD class=mbt> </TD><TD class=mbt align=middle>Line</TD></TR><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD class=mbt width=100 align=middle><INPUT value=0 size=5 name=Percent> </TD><TD class=mbt width=100 align=middle>Convert</TD><TD class=mbt width=100 align=middle><INPUT value=0 size=5 name=Line> </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#ffffff><TD class=mbt align=middle><INPUT class=text onclick=CalcLine(this.form) value="% -- > Line" type=button> </TD><TD class=mbt align=middle><INPUT class=text onclick=clearForm(this.form) value="Reset Form" type=button> </TD><TD class=mbt align=middle><INPUT class=text onclick=CalcPercent(this.form) value="%<-- Line" type=button></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

 

[IrishTim]

Tim, could you still whip up this spread sheet? I'd appreciate it.

This should work. Some of you guys test it out and let me know if there are any issues. The first sheet is the one I just whipped up, the other worksheets are others that people have passed on to me if you prefer those.

I know this thread has some excel studs, so don't give me shit if the logic is a little clunky or whatnot.

 

[pops69]

thursday may 13th

pdws for today and updated master and sharing data and info below.

added PC Dog to pdws (based on press coverage info)

nice small schedule, with poss 1 waldo. love it

 

[oilbarrel]

Data error

same ump yesterday for both det games yday

 

[jblonghorn]

So this condensed schedule, along with getouttadodge day games, can lead to some under possibilities right?

 

[CTP]

PC DOGS
There should be one today or at least I show 1. Broke that record down to N and A games
N for the dog is 5-2 so very profitable while
A is 2-4 maybe slightly profitable big numbers there however.

Not sure of these but it is what it is. Stuff this time of year changes by the week. Look at the consecutive games where 4 was a magic number it is now magic the other way. Home at 4 is 2-10 last 10 gms where it was a very good winner and 4 away is now 7-4 last 10 days where year to date at 22-42. Home plays closed the gap much quicker. Many of these overlap but not all.

 

[CTP]

Did a comparison of opening line categories from last year to this year. Set the closing date at 5-12. One on the left is last year and right is this year. Not sure how it will post on here. You will see there is no comparison from last year to this year in regards to the large favorites. What was applied to the PDWS regarding the home dog has additional filters however not considered here.

<TABLE style="WIDTH: 460pt; BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=610><COLGROUP><COL style="WIDTH: 92pt" span=2 width=122><COL style="WIDTH: 92pt" width=122><COL style="WIDTH: 92pt" span=2 width=122><TBODY><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102 height=20 width=122>2009</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102 width=122>2009</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #ece9d8; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: #ece9d8; BORDER-RIGHT: #ece9d8" class=xl98 width=122></TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102 width=122>2010</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102 width=122>2010</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF1 23-19</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD1 20-28</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ece9d8; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl103> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HF1 15-23</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD1 20-31</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF2 38-29</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD2 21-10</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl101> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HF2 23-12</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD2 8-21</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF3 38-53</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD3 12-10</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl101> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl100>HF3 39-21</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD3 20-23</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF4 47-27</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD4 5-10</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl101> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl100>HF4 32-29</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD4 19-15</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF5 33-16</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD5 0-3</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl101> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl100>HF5 38-24</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD5 10-6</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF6 15-13</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD6 2-1</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl101> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl100>HF6 31-15</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD6 0-3</TD></TR><TR style="HEIGHT: 15pt" height=20><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; HEIGHT: 15pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 height=20 width=122>HF7 12-3</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 92pt; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl99 width=122>HD7 0-0</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl101> </TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl100>HF7 16-13</TD><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: windowtext 0.5pt solid; BORDER-LEFT: windowtext; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; BORDER-TOP: windowtext; BORDER-RIGHT: windowtext 0.5pt solid" class=xl102>HD7 0-1</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

 

[presscoverage]

PC DOGS
There should be one today or at least I show 1. Broke that record down to N and A games
N for the dog is 5-2 so very profitable while
A is 2-4 maybe slightly profitable big numbers there however.

I also show a play for today. Here is the breakdown btwn leagues for 2009:

AL: 12-20 +1,095
NL: 10-20 +605
IL: 2-3 +195
TOTAL: 24-43 +1,895