You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2010 mlb capping & betting #102 - daily key info plus q&a
- Thread starter pops69
- Start date
It was better than that, I was already on Tampa. The two that hurt were the Cubs over and the White Sox.
no what was scary if that i still had about 30k of open scalps when i fell asleep. normally there are questions in the thread an i get notification buzzers to go answer them, but nothing yesterday and i was in deep la la land. picking up hirsh on the late game made up for it though
PDWS for today. I make comments as I review the listed plays. One should be doing this themselves just so you don't get dragged down the river.
There are 2 JJ VIS plays today. I would stay clear. One in the N league is 1-3 last 21 days and the A play is 1-5 last 60. Record since its inception is 13-19.
Might make a fool out of myself as I don't look at the pdws I transfer it all over to my master and use it. Basically the same but I have a lot more outlooks I look at like these win loss records.
I believe Pops mentioned he has been passing on the jj plays as just better fish in the sea if they win.
Road dog is in the N league just commented on this a day or so ago. Last 10 days 4-9. A league is much better. Always at risk on those big favorites and going agst them. Me I will pass. You do have Mil as the play agst STL so who knows. MIlw sucks but can pull some games out of their ass. I only have one other cat that shows a small advantage to STL but small so like I said NO.
There are 2 JJ VIS plays today. I would stay clear. One in the N league is 1-3 last 21 days and the A play is 1-5 last 60. Record since its inception is 13-19.
Might make a fool out of myself as I don't look at the pdws I transfer it all over to my master and use it. Basically the same but I have a lot more outlooks I look at like these win loss records.
I believe Pops mentioned he has been passing on the jj plays as just better fish in the sea if they win.
Road dog is in the N league just commented on this a day or so ago. Last 10 days 4-9. A league is much better. Always at risk on those big favorites and going agst them. Me I will pass. You do have Mil as the play agst STL so who knows. MIlw sucks but can pull some games out of their ass. I only have one other cat that shows a small advantage to STL but small so like I said NO.
PDWS for today. I make comments as I review the listed plays. One should be doing this themselves just so you don't get dragged down the river.
There are 2 JJ VIS plays today. I would stay clear. One in the N league is 1-3 last 21 days and the A play is 1-5 last 60. Record since its inception is 13-19.
Might make a fool out of myself as I don't look at the pdws I transfer it all over to my master and use it. Basically the same but I have a lot more outlooks I look at like these win loss records.
I believe Pops mentioned he has been passing on the jj plays as just better fish in the sea if they win.
Road dog is in the N league just commented on this a day or so ago. Last 10 days 4-9. A league is much better. Always at risk on those big favorites and going agst them. Me I will pass. You do have Mil as the play agst STL so who knows. MIlw sucks but can pull some games out of their ass. I only have one other cat that shows a small advantage to STL but small so like I said NO.
So you don't think the JJ visitors are worth a fade yet?
Just thinking out loud: On most situations you suggest looking at several angles before pulling the trigger, but with the waldos you pretty much tail them blindly without regard to pitchers' ERA, etc. And you also seem to hang with them even if their current performance isn't doing that great, e.g. Davidson's record going into yesterday was I think 11-12. Interested in hearing your comments about this. I know a few days ago you did shake up the list. Is that a set, planned evaluation every so often or just something you do whenever you feel it's needed?
Just thinking out loud: On most situations you suggest looking at several angles before pulling the trigger, but with the waldos you pretty much tail them blindly without regard to pitchers' ERA, etc. And you also seem to hang with them even if their current performance isn't doing that great, e.g. Davidson's record going into yesterday was I think 11-12. Interested in hearing your comments about this. I know a few days ago you did shake up the list. Is that a set, planned evaluation every so often or just something you do whenever you feel it's needed?
check the pdws. davidson is not a waldo
What public % are you using for this....51%...60%...or what?
i take a quick mind count when i'm entering the public numbers from sports options, and anying ov 50 the wrong way is wrong. (one of the few pieces of data that i fat finger in as cant grab any java data, maybe some can but i sure dont know how)
