than yesterday's was wrong. that all copy past from my master pdws file for the results and if i place the paste point in the wrong spot its all wrong. but the header for what they should be is in row 29. the reason for the header diff in the top vs the bottom is that my master have hidden calc that have nothing to do with the end results so i just have those hidden, and do a couple of copy paste specials to the pdws i upload so that they dont confuse everyone
For those of u using the master pivot tables, one of the most import thing you should do when your looking at the pivot tables etc, is to check the filters at the top of them and make sure they cover the range of data your looking for results for. They are where i had them the last time i might have used that pivot table, so it might only be april, or it could be june and july or the entire year. I've made the same mistake 1000 time b4 and bet into a game using what i felt were correct numbers. Better safe than sorry
rev c i just thought of this so i'll give it a try. as the master is not for everyone i taken all of the zen pivot tables and posted them in the daily pdws so that anyone wanting to know what a specific zen is doing all they need to do is look at the data starting in row 50 (which is where i plan to put it everyday) it's in the same order as the pdws zen, ctp, pc home dog, and jj plays records since the day we started posting them. let me know if you have any questions.
i know this just cant be true....must be one of those left wing jokes or something like that....Hundreds of federal employees may have improperly reaped millions in Social Security disability benefits, according to a government watchdog that caught workers at several major agencies pocketing fraudulent payments. The Government Accountability Office issued a report that showed at least 1,500 federal employees may have wrongly received benefits. The group's investigation, which focused on two Social Security programs for people who have limited incomes due to disabilities, found several specific cases in which beneficiaries were earning well above the income cap while still receiving benefits. In one case, a Transportation Security Administration screener was overpaid $108,000, according to the report. "Our case studies ... confirmed some examples in which individuals received SSA disability payments that they were not entitled to receive," the GAO said in a letter to Sens. Tom Carper, D-Del.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; and Tom Coburn, R-Okla. Some of the payments were attributed to fraud, others to "administrative error," according to the report. The GAO found that the Social Security Administration does not use its own automated system to flag workers who may be earning too much income to qualify for benefits. "SSA's internal controls did not prevent improper and fraudulent payments," the GAO said. The report also found thousands of commercial drivers and transportation business owners who may be skirting the law. It focused in part on federal employees, estimating that 1,500 workers were receiving about $1.7 million monthly. Of them, one-quarter were U.S. Postal Service employees and 16 percent were Defense Department civilians. YOU MIGHT ALSO BE INTERESTED IN Avoid Falling Victim to a Speed Trap What to Expect if Bush Tax Cuts Expire Buffett's Dairy Queen Chilly on Frozen Yogurt Lawsuit Rabid Dogs Kill 78 in Holiday Hotspot of Bali Ex 'Idol' Star Kristy Lee Cook Scores a Hunting Reality Show The report came with a DVD that showed employees double dipping -- by working and receiving benefits. The video showed overpayments to the TSA employee as well as Postal Service workers. According to the report, the TSA employee started receiving disability benefits in 1995 for "mood and anxiety disorders." But she started full-time work in 2003 and earned as much as $50,000; the income cap after which disability payments are supposed to stop was $940 per month in 2008. "Our investigation found that the beneficiary committed fraud in obtaining SSA disability payments," the report said. GAO said the employee told the Social Security Administration she did not want the agency to contact her employer for work information and that she would submit a report herself, though records indicate she never did. Her benefits have since been suspended. In another case, an X-ray technician for the Department of Veterans Affairs in California was overpaid about $22,000. According to the report, the worker started receiving payments in 2002 for an infection but continued to receive the money after returning to work in 2007. In yet another case, a Postal Service worker in Michigan received an overpayment of about $45,000. That worker was approved for "mood and personality disorders" in 2004 but returned to work later that year. The payments continued through early 2007, and then picked up again in late 2008. According to the report, a repayment of about $37,000 was made in 2008. Many of these workers received a $250 economic stimulus payment on top of the overpayments. The report also found problems in the private sector. The GAO found 62,000 workers who received commercial driver's licenses after they were deemed eligible for full disability benefits, "an indication that these individuals may no longer have serious medical conditions." The investigation revealed 7,900 people with "registered transportation businesses" receiving the benefits. The GAO clarified that a more thorough investigation would be needed to see whether those payments were fraudulent, improper or both. The GAO suggested that the Social Security Administration start making better use of its automated system to catch overpayments in the future. The agency uses the system to track increases in monthly earnings in order to compute changes in benefits payments, but it doesn't use the system to flag people who return to work and may be eligible to have their benefits suspended.
so why can someone with some nuts do this to the dem and rep parties. they are more anticompetitive and corrupt than all the companies in the world combined...It's been quite a stretch since the Federal Trade Commission first investigated and then ultimately sued Intel for alleged anticompetitive conduct, but the saga has now come to a close -- the two parties today announced a settlement of the charges. While that's no doubt better than some of the alternatives for Intel, it's hardly getting off easy -- the settlement prohibits Intel from paying computer makers to buy its chips exclusively or to refuse to buy chips from others, and bans it from retaliating against other computer makers if they do business with non-Intel suppliers. What's more, the settlement also requires Intel to modify its intellectual property agreements with AMD, NVIDIA, and VIA to give those companies "more freedom to consider mergers or joint ventures with other companies, without the threat of being sued by Intel for patent infringement," and it requires that Intel maintain the PCI Express Bus interface "in a way that will not limit the performance of graphics processing chips" for at least six years, among some other stipulations. For Intel's part, it notes that it hasn't admitted to any wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement, and says that the move allows it "to put an end to the expense and distraction of the FTC litigation
you had them in there from the first pdws today....thanks
so do you do some type of spreadsheet for the football? Any preseason angles that you look for?
