Because you said they were better after he killed himself.
His death allowed them to be remembered as they were and made them more millions, his death assured that they didnt go through a 2, 3 or 4 record streak of shit music. I never said they were better, I said his eating a bullet kept them relevant instead of featured on a where are they now episode
Based on 3 albums? The were at the right place at the right time, not on the same level as the all time greats
This is about the only thing in this thread I can agree with you on. There isn't much of a difference between them, because they were (and are) both GREAT bands. They both were hugely influential on music for a decade or more. A decade which, IMO, is one of the best in music history..There isnt much difference between Nirvana and Guns N Roses, except Axl Rose stuck around. The hype was pretty much the same for both bands.