Oh right I forgot everyone must've glanced over your "cowboys ml romo sling pound it" thread.
The he reason for bet tracking is to try and study the ROI of a bets under a certain parameter and see how it fares throughout the season without actually risking substantial units on an untested strategy. Is it that hard to comprehend?
The he reason for bet tracking is to try and study the ROI of a bets under a certain parameter and see how it fares throughout the season without actually risking substantial units on an untested strategy. Is it that hard to comprehend?
Congrats to you as well Lippman, I appreciate you bringing your keen insight on the Panthers by creating the thread. Hope to hear more from you as the season goes along. Also thanks to those of you with who dropped in with some constructive criticism, I hope your nights went well.
Not off to the best start for the (misc. + puckline) parlays as Wisconsin (NCAAB) is the leg that busts whereas Hawks, Panthers, and Cuse won. However, I will continue to see how it does for a few weeks for evaluation purposes. I will also continue to try and post the NHL model plays + results + unit tracking from my friend. Too early to speak but it appears the Jets (7.6 adv) play would've been the right choice in the Winnipeg/Anaheim. That advantage range is barely over .500 but tends to have higher net returns as you are generally playing dogs who are priced higher than the model predicts.
[YTD: 0-1 (-1.18)]
Alt Pucks + Stuff
Syracuse ML [w]
Wisconsin ML [l]
Blackhawks +1.5 [w]
Panthers +1.5 [w]
(-118) to win 1 unit [LOST]
I went with the Panthers as well. Here are numbers that I got from my friend.
Jets look like a high advantage play (on the ML) but not comfortable with Pavelec at the net.
Very observant, good job boy. You can read a scoreboard. As I stated, the NHL model showed that the Jets are a high advantage play. Didn't play it or play against it. Take it for what it is worth BRO.
