Yeah I mean the probability of these games isn’t dependent on the previous 2 gamesThe 3-0 defense is now a little bit of the fallacy with probabilities coming into play....
It's 3-2. It's the same as saying a quarter will come up heads 4 times in a row 6.25 percent of the time. But that probability does not still hold true when heads has already come up 2 times.
You see this a lot with roulette. O the ball has come up red 6 times in a row it has to come up black soon. It's not the perfect analogy to this series----but the 3-0 defense of why they are more likely to win games 6 or 7 then if they first 3 games had played differently doesn't really hold water.
Though I always wonder about the human element in sports creating some sort of effect that we simply can’t account for