worst bad beat of all time

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,505
Tokens
The NCAA rule book states [FONT=&quot]that that a period is extended if a penalty is accepted for a live ball foul but “the period is not extended if the foul is by the team in possession and the statement of the penalty includes loss of down.” The sentence in quotes applies perfectly to Oklahoma State. The Cowboys had the ball and committed a foul (intentional grounding) that includes a loss of down.[/FONT]
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
yes regardless of if it was intentional grounding or not that is meaningless.

mike p said that it is illegal to give the defense an untimed down on an offensive flag.
he said they should have been given a 15 yard flag and replay the down on offense.

of course at that point with no time on the clock all they would have had to do was get in victory formation and ended the game.

then there would have never even been that hail mary play.

so not only did cm complete one of the most amazing hail marys ever.

they completed on a play where they were illegally awarded the ball when they should not have.


and yes the play changed the outcome on under 28 2nd half.

I just want to know the official rule from the NCAA. I heard Mike P speak and it's interesting. But intentional grounding is a loss of down so not sure how they can give the ball back to the offense. Will be interesting.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,505
Tokens
Sure thing pole smoke! I open a thread to read about a bad beat and instead have to read some bullsh*t by you. Really want to follow your punk ass.
Chop sorry again. College foots can be ugly!


i dont agree with him politically most of the time like most of you but ive always given him the right to speak his mind without getting on his case like most people over here.

then he comes in here to be a dick to one of the few people who have been nice to him.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The NCAA rule book states that that a period is extended if a penalty is accepted for a live ball foul but “the period is not extended if the foul is by the team in possession and the statement of the penalty includes loss of down.” The sentence in quotes applies perfectly to Oklahoma State. The Cowboys had the ball and committed a foul (intentional grounding) that includes a loss of down.

If that's the rule, then I agree they should reverse the decision and give Ok St the win.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,836
Tokens
i dont agree with him politically most of the time like most of you but ive always given him the right to speak his mind without getting on his case like most people over here.

then he comes in here to be a dick to one of the few people who have been nice to him.

You want to vent like we all do at times. Guy wants to start an argument about it ? He has got to be in total misery to have to disagree with just about everything.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
i dont agree with him politically most of the time like most of you but ive always given him the right to speak his mind without getting on his case like most people over here.

then he comes in here to be a dick to one of the few people who have been nice to him.

Lets not play this youre innocent game. I made a comment without looking at the second half total line. All you gotta do is say it was a second half bet. When you add in the dum dum.....I don't know what kind of response you expect.

Instead of going on about it and joining in with these other nitwits with " it's all Vit" fault......just say you are angry about the loss and decide to call names.....no biggie.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
You want to vent like we all do at times. Guy wants to start an argument about it ? He has got to be in total misery to have to disagree with just about everything.

Not even close to what happened.

I has penn st and cmich today ......no misery at all. Never a bad day in my life. Thanks!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,836
Tokens
Lets not play this youre innocent game. I made a comment without looking at the second half total line. All you gotta do is say it was a second half bet. When you add in the dum dum.....I don't know what kind of response you expect.

Instead of going on about it and joining in with these other nitwits with " it's all Vit" fault......just say you are angry about the loss and decide to call names.....no biggie.

Thought you said you were going out? Just want to get that last word in huh? You are a dick and there really isnt anything you can say here that makes your bullsh*t ok. Libtard fallacy believing he is right even though facts prove him wrong.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The referee in the game admits he shouldn't have allowed the down. I think the NCAA gives it to OK St. How the books deal with that, I have no clue.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
bad beat but nowhere near the worst of all time

The only reason it's "not" is because it wasn't a big game nor a game bet. But if that situation happened in a bigger game, it would be one of the worst beats of all time. I've never seen anything like it in my life and if I had any money whatsoever on that game that I won/loss because of that sequence of events, it would definitely rank up there as one of the worst bad beats.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,547
Tokens
I had this game on a 8 game ML parlay for even money. Totally sux. My line for the pokes was -1100. Put in the play on thursday
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,447
Tokens
The only reason it's "not" is because it wasn't a big game nor a game bet. But if that situation happened in a bigger game, it would be one of the worst beats of all time. I've never seen anything like it in my life and if I had any money whatsoever on that game that I won/loss because of that sequence of events, it would definitely rank up there as one of the worst bad beats.

Please explain why the importance of the game should determine the level of bad beat? First time ever hearing someone say this.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Please explain why the importance of the game should determine the level of bad beat? First time ever hearing someone say this.

I don't think it should. That was my point. I'm just saying people are downplaying this like it isn't a bad beat, but if this happened on a national televised highly viewed game, it would be viewed as one of the worst beats ever.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Messages
872
Tokens
I got eliminated in a College Survivor Pool where i picked Okla St. Still keeping my fingers crossed that they overturn the decision ... I'm not certain it was the worst bad beat of all time, but it is sure as hell in the Bad Beat Hall of Shame.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,856
Messages
13,574,057
Members
100,876
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com