Wolfowitz' Amazingly Big Mouth and Other Iraqi Foibles

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
It's the blab heard 'round the world: Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said in a Vanity Fair interview that finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was not really a central goal after all:

"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on."

Full story here.

This disturbing comment, already being spun like a nuclear top in Washington, has only added fuel to the fire in Britain's parliament as oppositin to PM Tony Blair continues to grow (story here.)
In the wake of news that American is putting off Iraqi self-governance for a little while, and the persistent problems of continued armed resistance (including a baffling suicide attack that has catapulted the attacker into cult heroine status) Patrick Seale of the Gulf News (one of the most influential English-language news services in the Arab world) cautions America and it's Arab supporters against resistance to America's increasingly foolish policy and practices in the Middle East (article here.)

While I am opposed to pretty much any war on principles, I have found myself especially sickened by this latest example -- lies, propoganda, and actions which only worsen our foreign relations and by extension stand to endanger American lives and interests. Would that Bush & Co. would pool the wool from their own eyes long enough to see the disaster that they have wrought; it makes his father's shameful invasion of Panama seem like a mminor misunderstanding in comparison.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
Wolfowitz just keeps em coming ... it's amazing that the neo-cons use this guy as a mouthpiece. In a radio interview with Laura Ingraham, PW admits for the first time that Iraq had no ties to 9/11 and no ties to the al-Qaeda that anyone can prove.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Ingraham: And when did you start to think that perhaps Iraq had something to do with it?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Wolfowitz: I'm not sure even now that I would say Iraq had something to do with it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

FUll interview text is here.

Just a reminder now, Donald Rumsfeld last year said that the Pentagon and CIA had "bulletproof" evidence linking Iraq to al-Qaeda, although he never showed it. The one instance which was made publicly known -- hijacker Mohammed Atta's alleged meeting with an Iraqi agent in Prague in early 2001, was later determined by our own intelligence agenices to have never actually happened.


Gotta love these jokers.


Phaedrus
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,153
Messages
13,564,658
Members
100,752
Latest member
gamebet888host
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com