Will we ever see the NFL in LOS ANGELES again?

Search

Will we ever see the NFL in LOS ANGELES again?


  • Total voters
    41

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Let all 32 team keep playing musical chairs. Fuck the owners. Make them all privately fund a stadium.

Give the city of dallas credit, they forced the Cowboys to move to Arlington. However, when the Super Bowl is in Dallas, they will all still stay, eat and spend money in Dallas, not Arlington.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,886
Tokens
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/sh...ces-intentions-to-poach-the-Ja?urn=nfl,212070

Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:47 am EST
Los Angeles announces intentions to poach the Jaguars or Bills

By MJD

ept_sports_nfl_experts-20896000-1262789145.jpg
There's a company that plans to build a stadium outside of L.A., and that company also has plans to steal a couple of NFL teams from other cities. Their intended targets of thievery: the Buffalo Bills and Jacksonville Jaguars. From the AP:
Majestic Realty Co. managing partner John Semcken said the company is still considering at least seven franchises for a new stadium some 25 miles east of Los Angeles.
They also include the San Francisco 49ers, San Diego Chargers, Minnesota Vikings, St. Louis Rams and Oakland Raiders.
But he said the Jaguars and the Bills are at the top of the list because they play in small markets that tamp down their earning potential and because they have little hope of building larger venues in their home regions.
At the very least, that last part is true. Building a bigger stadium for Jacksonville football fans would be like building a bigger public library for high school drop-out crystal meth tweakers. It's just not going to get much use.
It's kind of a strange announcement, and if I were a Jaguars or Bills fan, I'd take it a little personally. Basically, the L.A. people have just announced that they hate you and are planning on taking something that you love. That's just not very nice.
There's no reason to panic yet, though, as we're a long way from anything like that happening. A lot of people have wanted to put a team in L.A., and every single one of them has failed to get their act together. When it comes to landing an NFL team, L.A., for about fifteen years now, has been all talk.
I wouldn't worry too much about it just yet, Bills and Jags fans. Of course, it probably wouldn't hurt to start, you know, filling your stadium, either.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
393
Tokens
The guy in the interview is a fukking idiot.

LA could not even keep 1 team and he says they will get 2 teams for that stadium. NO FUKKING WAY.

And as far as the St. Louis Rams go, they are locked in their lease through the 2015 season. They CANNOT move before then. The City of St. Louis would block any attempt by any ownership group who tried to move the Rams before the lease is over.

Now, I could see the Rams (who are on the market) being sold to someone who moves them to LA after the 2015 season

But this douchebag in the interview needs to understand NFL Leases 101 before adding the Rams to that list.

LA didn't want the Rams. Plain and simple. They didn't want the Raiders. Plain and simple.

They cannot support the NFL. Even the Dodgers had empty seats in the playoffs last fall. It is pound for pound a terrible pro sports city except for the Lakers.

LA already has a pro football team - the Trojans...if you know what I mean.
 

Rx Local
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,133
Tokens
Vikings will move there for 2012 season if they dont get a new stadium in the next 2 years their lease at metrodome ends after 2011 season
 

New member
Joined
Dec 10, 2004
Messages
393
Tokens
I can't see either the Bills or the Vikings leaving for LA. Vikes may very well win the NFC this year which will help their support.

LA had their chances - twice - and blew them both.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
55
Tokens
I hope it isntb the Vikings. Everyone else is getting a new stadium in Minnesota except the Vikings
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
think they have to...just too big of a market to avoid..

agree

isn't LA the 2nd largest city in the USA ?

2 NBA teams

2 MLB teams

certainly LA can handle an NFL team for 8 home games a year.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,886
Tokens
http://losangeles.sbnation.com/2010/12/1/1849022/los-angeles-chargers-nfl-san-diego-philip-anschutz


Los Angeles Chargers, Could The NFL Return?


56456_chiefs_chargers_football_large.jpg
Could Philip Rivers be bringing his talents to Venice Beach?


By Josie Becker - Contributor
Read More: San Diego Chargers, Minnesota Vikings, St. Louis Rams
Rumors are floating that AEG has purchased a 35% share of the San Diego Chargers. AEG already owns portions or the entirety of the LA Lakers, Kings, and Galaxy as well as the Home Depot Center and the Staples Center.




Dec 1, 2010 - The facts are these: Last night, as many of us were sleeping, a Toronto radio station reported that Philip Anschutz of Anschutz Entertainment Group fame had bought 35% of the San Diego Chargers. AEG already owns stakes in the Los Angeles Lakers, Los Angeles Kings, and owns the Los Angeles Galaxy, the Home Depot Center, and the Staples Center. Were these rumors to pan out, it would almost certainly mean a move north up the 5 freeway for the San Diego Chargers.
This morning, an attorney for the San Diego Chargers denied the report saying:
"There is no truth to the rumor out of Toronto that the Chargers have agreed to sell a portion of the team to Mr. Anschutz," Chargers attorney Mark Fabiani said in a statement late Tuesday night.​
However there are facts which support the rumor currently making its way around the internet. AEG has announced plans to build a $725 million NFL stadium in downtown LA, complete with retractable roof. This plan is of course contingent on getting a tenant, though who that tenant is up to today hasn't been specified. Buying 35% of the Chargers certainly would make business sense.
The Chargers also recently announced that Alex Spanos was looking to sell a minority stake in the Chargers to help with estate taxes. The 87-year-old owns 36% of the team with his wife Faye, their four children each have 15%, and there are two minority owners that control the other 4%. The goal was always to sell a minority stake, there was never any risk that the family would lose control of the team.
If the rumors are true, it will be interesting to see where Anschutz is getting his 35% from. Under current NFL rules, it only takes 30% ownership to run a team, so whether Anschutz is buying shares directly from Spanos or from a conglomerate of the Spanos children is a major distinction. In the first scenario Anchutz would take over control of the team's operations, in the second the family would retain control.
Also on the table on the Minnesota Vikings who have allegedly been approached by Ed Roski who is the man behind the City of Industry proposal and AEG CEO Tim Leiweke. Leiweke played a large role in getting David Beckham to make his move to the LA Galaxy. A visit from him is almost the same as a visit from Anschutz himself, however it's more likely that AEG simply wants to remain a player should the Vikings look westward.
The Chargers were founded as the Los Angeles Chargers of the AFL and played one year in the Coliseum before moving south to San Diego. The Minnesota Vikings are best known in Los Angeles for being a thorn in the side of the Los Angeles Rams. More on this story as it develops.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,886
Tokens
http://espn.go.com/blog/los-angeles/nfl/post/_/id/479/the-nfl-will-not-be-back-in-l-a-next-year

Thursday, October 27, 2011
The NFL will not be back in L.A. next year

By Arash Markazi

There are plenty of NFL teams who have used and continue to use the threat of a move to Los Angeles as leverage to get a new stadium built in their current city. It’s become a tradition almost as profitable for the league and its teams as the Super Bowl. Since the Raiders and Rams left Los Angeles 16 years ago, 22 brand-new NFL stadiums have opened and five others have undergone major renovations with many teams using the mirage of Hollywood to get whatever they want from the public sector.

Politicians in Minnesota and San Diego, however, shouldn’t be rushed into making any rash decisions on publically financing new stadiums for the Vikings and Chargers by the end of this year. The chances of any NFL team moving to Los Angeles next year are next to impossible.

Under the NFL’s “Policy and Procedures for Proposed Franchise Relocations” it states that the NFL commissioner must receive written notice from the team wishing to relocate and that “the notice must be filed no later than February 15 of the year in which the move is scheduled to occur.” That notice would also be published "in newspapers of general circulation within the incumbent community."

This is significant because Farmers Field, AEG’s proposed stadium in downtown Los Angeles, will not be done with its environmental impact report until June and will not have a finalized deal with the city until the report is complete. Once their EIR is filed, the clock begins on legal challenges against the report and if one is filed within 30 days it will likely not be decided on until November 2012.

No team would move to a city where a new stadium was still a question mark and the league wouldn’t allow such a move either.

Warehouse magnate Ed Roski’s proposed stadium in the City of Industry, however, could begin construction as soon as a team decided to move there. He is willing to hand over 600 acres of land 30 miles east of the Staples Center in exchange for buying a percentage of the team. The problem with his plan is he wants the team’s majority owners to assume the risk of financing, building and owning the stadium. Presumably, if the team’s owners were willing to take on that kind of risk they would have already done so in their current city instead of seeking public financing, which simply isn't an option Los Angeles.

The league loves competition when it comes to the Los Angeles market. There have always been competing proposals and locations for the city’s next NFL team since the Raiders and Rams moved in 1995, with one group always driving up the cost on the other. Since only one of the proposed stadiums will be built it is unlikely the league would kill the Farmers Field project four months before it was finalized by approving a team relocating to the City of Industry. The downtown site has received support on both the city and state levels and secured a $700 million naming rights deal from Farmers Insurance, the largest in sports history. That doesn’t guarantee the stadium will get built but the league certainly won't pull the plug on the project now. They want both groups to be in a position to make presentations to team owners and outline their definitive plans before deciding which one works.

After being away from the second biggest media market in the country for an entire generation, the league isn’t going to rush back now simply because the Vikings have hit a roadblock when it comes to financing their proposed $1.1 billion stadium in Ramsey County. Or because the Chargers don’t even have schematics, let alone political support, for their proposed retractable roof stadium tied to an expanded convention center in downtown San Diego. Or because the St. Louis Rams can try to get out of their stadium lease next year if they don’t think it can become one of the top stadiums in the league. Or because any thought of a new stadium for the Oakland Raiders is as big a mystery as the future of the team’s ownership.

How and when the NFL returns to Los Angeles is bigger than those stadium concerns.

The agreement that laid the foundation for the NFL's current "Policy and Procedures for Proposed Franchise Relocations" was a 1996 "Statement of Principles" between the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the NFL. The deal came on the heels of the Raiders’ move from Los Angeles to Oakland in July 1995. It was a move that occurred so late it wasn’t officially finalized until days before the Raiders’ opening preseason game against, coincidentally enough, the Rams, who had just moved to St. Louis.

The policy now states that “because League policy favors stable team-community relations, clubs are obligated to work diligently and in good faith to obtain and to maintain suitable stadium facilities in their home territories, and to operate in a manner that maximizes fan support in their current home community. A club may not, however, grant exclusive negotiating rights to a community or potential stadium landlord other than one in its current home territory."

"If, having diligently engaged in good faith efforts, a club concludes that it cannot obtain a satisfactory resolution of its stadium needs, it may inform the League Office and the stadium landlord or other relevant public authorities that it has reached a stalemate in those negotiations.”

This is important in San Diego where they are trying to put a stadium measure on the ballot for November 2012 and in Minneapolis where they might have to wait until November 2012 as well for a vote on public funding and in St. Louis where the Rams and the St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission will likely to go to arbitration after June 2012 to decide the future of the Rams’ lease at the Edward Jones Dome.

In each one of these scenarios the team must see the situation through before they can go to the league and propose relocation. If the Chargers’ stadium proposal gets voted down and if the Vikings don’t get the necessary public funding for their proposed stadium and if the St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission cannot place the Edward Jones Dome in the top quarter of current NFL stadiums through refurbishments and is unable to build the team a new stadium up to those standards, each one of those teams would then be able to go to the league and file for relocation with proper cause.

All signs point to the NFL returning to Los Angeles by February 15, 2013. The only question now is which team or teams will it be.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,800
Messages
13,573,249
Members
100,870
Latest member
gadawg85
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com