Please, they know what they're doing; creating drama.
Best way to keep people talking about it is to keep shaking it up, and it is of no consequence because they know it will play itself out on the field.
It appears the main reason Oregon is ranked so high is because they beat a super overrated UCLA squad who the pollsters also have ranked comically too high. That helps the Ducks a ton. UCLA is not a top 5 PAC 12 team IMO.
these are just you're opinions.... UCLA for whatever you think is still ranked 11th, higher then Notre Dame, and would be favored over ND.....I'm not necessarily saying Oregon should be ranked ov Fla St, but please don't bs us all here that Fla St has better wins, because they don't
these are just you're opinions.... UCLA for whatever you think is still ranked 11th, higher then Notre Dame, and would be favored over ND.....I'm not necessarily saying Oregon should be ranked ov Fla St, but please don't bs us all here that Fla St has better wins, because they don't
I just think the Pac 12 is overrated for the millionth year in a row. UCLA could barely get by a shitty Texas squad with half the team suspended. USC lost to shitty Boston College. Stanford couldn't hang with Notre Dame. Arizona, the team that beat Oregon, got all they could handle from powerhouses like UTSA and Nevada. Oregon and Arizona State are the only legit teams from that conference but the pollsters suck off the Pac 12 like they are the SEC. Don't get it.
The SEC West is the most dominant group of teams in the history of NCAAF. From top to bottom. They are 26-0 outside the SEC, they have one loss outside the SEC West and that was Arkansas losing to Georgia. I think Arkansas would be the 2nd-3rd best team in the PAC-12 and probably the best team in the Big-10!
its nice that you're not on the committee
You're going to argue against Pac 12 like you have for years....
I probably know far more about college football than any of the committee members. Anyone who understands football will agree with me. You have to be a very very big homer to think the PAC-12 is even close to the level of talent than the SEC West this year.
I probably know far more about college football than any of the committee members. Anyone who understands football will agree with me. You have to be a very very big homer to think the PAC-12 is even close to the level of talent than the SEC West this year.
Nothing personal. It's just overrated most years. Blame the voters. I'm just the voice of reason.
You guys have an Arizona team close to the top 10 in the nation that could barely beat a 2-7 UTSA team and Nevada of the MAC. Same Nevada team that lost 2 of it's first 3 MAC games. I just think people believe the conference is much better than it really is. The SEC is heads and tails better than everyone this year with the Pac 12, Big 12, and Big Ten grouped a step below, but yet the Pac 12 gets regarded as a top conference and the others don't.
Like I said, blame the voters.
You dont even know a tenth of the football that Tryone Willingham knows, let alone Barry fucking Alvarez, let a-fucking-lone as much as a fermented turd from Tom Osborne's puckered ass. Just when I think you cant possibly be any more ignorant, you reset the bar.
Don't think anyone on this forum believes you know more then the committee.... You keep beating you're chest with the SEC.. maybe you should pay a little more attention to the argument content.... The current argument is Oregon's quality wins compared to Fla St's...Oregon's are better , especially if you just look at the rankings.. You're next response should have nothing to do with the SEC.. trying to help you here