Seattle doesnt have the d line to pressure Brady. Green Bay exploited the middle against Seattle, last I heard, NE has a pretty good tight end. They slow Lynch, and lock up those seattle wrs, while pounding blunt and using Gronk in the middle of the field.
It took a truly terrible and conservative coach to extend the seattle season. In comes bellichek with 2 weeks to prepare.
Call me a sheep, a square, a sap, a whatever u want, but the patriots are winning this game. Im not even positive that it ll be close.
If anyone is betting seattle and wishes to save the juice, please pm me.
Dude, why are you capping the super bowl on just the last game Seattle played?
Why would anyone wager someone online on this game? Its basically the same line you're giving......my 2 locals have Seattle Pk (-105) & Seattle -1 (+100)
Now if you're willing to give me 2-1 on my bet, I'm down for it........also, we would need to send our money into BAS.....if he would be willing to hold our bets, I trust him.
Sure dude, lets make it 3-1. ha ha. And if its a pick at -105, thats not exactly what I am offering now is it? Pick at even money is not the same as pick -105..right? Why the hell would i give odds? lol... U start early today my man?
Lmao...... I stopped drinking in 2003, & no, I wasn't an alcoholic. I'm just trying g to get the best line available, & 2-1 my way would be it I mean, everyone thinks Patriots will win easily, so its kind of, put your money where your mouth is deal......haha! Anyway, good luck with your wager.
Vegas took in around 100 million on last years super bowl........2/3 of the money was on Denver........I'm.expecting more than 2/3 on the Patriots.
Last year Vegas made over 19 million in profits over all including prop bets. If Pats win, Vegas will take a HUGE bath.
I don't see it happening, go Seattle!
Ba‘al Zəvûv;10954464 said:Which presents me with the chance to clarify that when I say "bad lines" get made on Super Bowl I ain't necessarily saying that Vegas gets hurt as result but that sharper bettors profit.
Moreso than they would have had a "bad line" not been set.
That line this year is NE+3....we'll see how "bad" it was
So you're saying that oddsmakers set a bad line & Pats are the play even at -2?
Anyone have data on the super bowl when more than 2/3 of the money is on one side?
I'm seeing 74% on the pats on scores and odds, btw.