What happened to all the 9/11 "truther" threads?

[random1323]

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=loose+change+final+cut&sitesearch=#

you can't debate people that won't look at the mounds off evidence. willie scott

 

[Willie99]

accusations are not evidence

IMHO, a lot more evidence works against you, Random

and there are thousands more unanswered questions found within any and all truther arguments.

plus truthers themselves are not even on the same page, they attack from serveral different angles, often times negating each other arguments.

many truthers simply change their truther theory once one of them is drilled with too many holes. Fuckin moving targets




eek's alien theory has me stumped though

 

[random1323]

how would you know if you don't watch the documentaries?

 

[quantumleap]

I can't wait until football season starts.

 

[Willie99]

I can't wait until football season starts.

I can't believe it's almost here.

then college hoops (fuck, a contribution is due soon)

 

[random1323]

sports are what they are today for the simple purpose of keeping people's minds on something other than shit that matters.

 

[Vision]

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=loose+change+final+cut&sitesearch=#

you can't debate people that won't look at the mounds off evidence. willie scott

Don't post this bullshit.

Plenty of qualified people have debated it. http://www.loosechangeguide.com

 

[random1323]

vision, pay attention. the video i posted is the final cut not the 2nd edition. i know tit for tat, but 2nd edition was made with barely any budget. after the 2nd edition grossed some money the boys had a lot of help with investigating and had questions from debunkers of the 2nd edition to clear up. the final cut has not been debunked.

 

[random1323]

even if you google loose change final cut debunked you get 20x more pro loosechange hits than debunked. so maybe it's you that should quit posting bullshit.

 

[Vision]

I'm not going to watch the documentary, because I've seen it already.

So if there were explosives in the trade towers, what does it prove? Wow, someone blew up the trade towers; I already knew that. Thanks.

 

[eek.]

eek's alien theory has me stumped though

That Zoggian visit was supressed by the sino catholic masonic zionists.
:grandmais

 

[tiznow]

mommy why is the sky blue?

 

[ScottL]

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigplay
McCAIN + 330..TONITE ONLY JOE.................

I'll take it BP if JC doesn't. I'll risk a Ben Franklin. If McCain falls ill and is replaced it's No Action. Deal?

???

 

[nimue77]

So if there were explosives in the trade towers, what does it prove?

It means we've been lied to.

 

[TotalRecall]

<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5596033" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Vision</TD><TD class=alt2>I'm not going to watch the documentary, because I've seen it already.

So if there were explosives in the trade towers, what does it prove? Wow, someone blew up the trade towers; I already knew that. Thanks.</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


Interesting point Vision. After it became evident from the ground zero documentaries nobody watches it was common knowledge among the cops and firemen there were explosions I felt that way too. Id say "Hey- Its like two mosquito bites on an elephant. Its only two buildings in NYC they hit- how many we got left?" Its not like they hit the Empire State building. There must be hundreds more." Wow. Somebody took down a couple buildings with explosives. Big deal.

You know what else I heard? I heard they (both towers) had a huge asbestos problem. Thats riight and they both had hundreds of code violations. Betcha didnt know that. Plus they were old- 30+ years actually. Fucking rat traps they were. I mean- if you ask me- those are the buildings the city of New York would have had to tear down anyway since they were in such bad shape. If the terrorists had given us a choice of which two buildings they were gonna destroy guess which ones - Twin towers no question. No brainer. We could actually almost thank them. In a way they did us a favor for doing what had to be done anyway. They just saved us the price of some pretty expensive explosives from the looks of those babies coming down with all that shit being blown outward as they fell.
Dumb fuckin terrorists... :nohead:

 

[roadreeler57]

Too many things point to foul play & coverup but nobody knows what to do about it yet, They want to trust their government so they do nothing.

 

[bigplay]

I'll take it BP if JC doesn't. I'll risk a Ben Franklin. If McCain falls ill and is replaced it's No Action. Deal?

Sorry, I didn't see your reply until now. It's a deal.
:toast:

 

[cutacrossshorty]

I'm not going to watch the documentary, because I've seen it already.

When someone gave me "Loose Change: The Final Cut.", my immediate reaction was, "I've seen this stuff before". I watched it anyway. I can tell you that it's a radically different movie. To dismiss it as "already seen it" would be a mistake.

 

[Willie99]

<table class="tborder" style="border-top-width: 0px;" width="100%" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1"><tbody><tr title="Post 5596033" valign="top"><td class="alt1" width="125" align="middle">Vision</td><td class="alt2">I'm not going to watch the documentary, because I've seen it already.

So if there were explosives in the trade towers, what does it prove? Wow, someone blew up the trade towers; I already knew that. Thanks.</td></tr></tbody></table>


Interesting point Vision. After it became evident from the ground zero documentaries nobody watches it was common knowledge among the cops and firemen there were explosions I felt that way too. Id say "Hey- Its like two mosquito bites on an elephant. Its only two buildings in NYC they hit- how many we got left?" Its not like they hit the Empire State building. There must be hundreds more." Wow. Somebody took down a couple buildings with explosives. Big deal.

You know what else I heard? I heard they (both towers) had a huge asbestos problem. Thats riight and they both had hundreds of code violations. Betcha didnt know that. Plus they were old- 30+ years actually. Fucking rat traps they were. I mean- if you ask me- those are the buildings the city of New York would have had to tear down anyway since they were in such bad shape. If the terrorists had given us a choice of which two buildings they were gonna destroy guess which ones - Twin towers no question. No brainer. We could actually almost thank them. In a way they did us a favor for doing what had to be done anyway. They just saved us the price of some pretty expensive explosives from the looks of those babies coming down with all that shit being blown outward as they fell.
Dumb fuckin terrorists... :nohead:

Very little truth found in many truther threads, such as "common knowledge among cops and firemen"

and

I'm sure glad I'm not a truther. Sorry TR, but that 2nd paragraph is one of the all time lows around here.

 

[TotalRecall]

No Willie - the all time low is you not understanding my post (as usual).

Satirical analogies are not your thing I guess...I suggest read it again till you get the Neocon Satire that you are unable to understand.

However I do find it amusing that you could accept Merrick's "satire" on his New Yorker cover. Nothing offensive about that as long as its liberal targeting huh?


Misplaced faultfinding on your part- or just more liberal hating at its lowest form?

Get a brain-get a clue- and take your meaningless words to a suck up who finds you palatable- youll get nothing from me but the pain of exposure- so proceed at your own peril little knat...