You can smoke weed?
You can also head up to San Fran and become a butt pirate, who gives a shit really...
What's funny is what you posted.
are all people that live in Texas simple minded?
I guess you think Im just talking out of my ass....so ill break it down for you
then you can reply with the
smiley to replace your limited vocab
I highlighted the important parts so its easy for you to follow
in my particular case...I was 'clocked' doing
56 in a 35...in california...when someone is cited for going
25 mph over the speed limit...they do NOT get the option for traffic school...also...
26 mph over the speed limit increases the fine about $200....hmm...I was 'clocked' just 26miles over the speed limit...1 miles less and it would have been about a $125 fine and the option to have it removed from my record...odd wouldnt you say??
no way in the world was I doing freeway speed in a residential area...most likely I was going 45 as all the traffic on that particular street does....anyhow...the officer was hiding behind a tree...and using his LIDAR gun...he got me in what is known as a "speed trap"
in order to understand what a "speed trap" is defined as...you need to read through the California Vehicle Code...which I did...and it states
40802 A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(a) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
40802(b) defines where "radar or other electronic devices" can be used to determine speed -- in essence, either on "local streets and roads" or on highways where a traffic survey has been conducted within the last five years.
http://www.ibiblio.org/rdu/ca-speed.html
in simple terms for you texasguy...if he uses LIDAR to clock drivers speed...according to california vehicle code...it is defined as a "speed trap"
see the little section at the end of CVC40802??...in regards to "traffic surveys"
according to california law...the city who posts the speed limit on their streets must have a VALID speed zone survey on file that is recent for up to 5 years...in order to use LIDAR or any other radar device to check drivers speed
if there is no valid speed zone survey for the road where LIDAR was used...the ticket is automatically thrown out in court...and the officer can actually be held in contempt for wriitng bogus tickets
now this law only applys to roads with a "relative" speed limit...highways have "absolute" speed limits...and can never be exceeded according to the law
but "absolute" speed limits..i.e. roads and residential...CAN BE EXCEEDED depending on the "safety" of the traffic conditions
there is also a case I was ready to cite from 1980 where in the law it states in order for a conviction for ANY crime the prosecution must prove the defendant is guilty of ALL ELEMENTS of the alleged charge
well....the basic speed law CVC22350 states...no driver shall drive at a unsafe speed depending on 5 different elements....you can look them up yourself...Im tired of educating you...no way would a prosecutor be able to prove someone was guilty of all 5 elements of the basic CVC22350 "unsafe speed" law...in california...especially if the ticket was written on a street that had a "relative" speed limit
it is in my opinion that the officer didnt show that day...because I requested a copy of the valid speed zone survey from the road I was ticketed on...also calibration records of the LIDAR gun...and the officers prior history of tickets written...in my discovery request before trial
you see...if the cop shows up...I ask him the question "can you please show me a valid speed zone survey for the road where you used LIDAR to clock my speed?"
when they cant provide it....not only does it make the court look like an ass
it now becomes public record that the dept who wrote my ticket also wrote HUNDREDS OF OTHER BOGUS TICKETS
the survey is used...to justfiy...the posted speed limit...maybe the survey recommends 45mph...but the city posts a speed limit of 35...are you following me here texasdude?
that officer already knew I was going to ask for the survey...he knew...and his dept knew...they didnt have it...so they took a loss for $375 with me...and collected the other $59609870807 from saps like yourself who didnt fight it
surprising if you came to cali you would want to visit san fran and not so cal...seems you might be educated in "butt pirates"...anything else would be highly questionable
:cripwalk: