Week 1 on the west side

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
I agree with you on the UCLA and Colorado games. I am on the fence on NW game, but your logic of Cal mailing it in is absolutely absurd. Nobody the first week of the season is mailing it in.

Ok maybe they won't just mail it in... it will just look like it in the box score.
Lesser teams than NW have put it to da Bears when they head out on the road.
I tend to exaggerate when I use these catch phrases... in a way it's like mailing it in.
:ohno:

BOL BTD. Hope you have a great year.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
I like all the pix; wonder if Bruins will overwhelm the cavs like ducks did in past..??

That was my line of thinking that got me looking at the Bruins in this one.
UCLA is one damn strong bunch and they have speed like the Oregon Ducks.
Mora is also using the hurry-up a lot more this year from what I have heard.
It so happens that their QB is also cut from the same cloth as Oregon's QB.
That kind of indicates to me where this game could very likely be headed.

I think Oregon beat them by 7 TD's LY. The linemaker is only asking you to
lay 3 TDs if you like UCLA in this spot. That's how I accounted for the lumber
in this wager.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
the sec has their own network now conan. ..DONT HATE THE PLAYA HATE THE FKN GAME!

Ganje- imitation is the best form of flattery. I never suggested that Mike Slive was oblivious to anyone else with a good idea and wouldn't be willing to follow if the situation called for it. Clearly pride in excess is not Mike Slive's issue. Of course there is now an SEC network, but goddam Directv... they don't even give a hoot. And as far as the SEC goes, they have done CFB a great service by excelling their game where at least 3 other major conferences have found it necessary to upgrade their game too if they want to compete with the SEC. Obviously as a Pac-12 fan, I have to admit that the SEC has put the screws down and the results around the country are phenomenal. The quality of the game across the board has not been this good for I don't know how many decades if ever. Now it's about time we kick their puckered little asses for doing that.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
887
Tokens
I always love checking your threads Conan. Great picks. I'll be tailing on NW for sure, but I don't like betting on bad teams on the road so I am staying away from the Buffs. Best of luck, though. Cal stinks and I don't see them winning very many games this year.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2010
Messages
9,660
Tokens
Hey, got lots of gratitude towards my CFB buddies in here. I truly appreciate all of your well wishes. I hope to have another 60% to 70% year ATS, not just for my own good, but for everyone that has it in for his bookmaker. That is the only attitude anyone needs.... if you disagree, then why do you think he's in the bookmaking business? When you understand that, you will know who your real friends are and who they aren't. So FUCKEM !! They are macho vato "gentlemen" that want only one thing... your money!! Never forget that. Don't let yourself ever become soft on that issue. Get him back on his heels and keep him there.


One of the better post I have read in a while. Taking some motivational speech classes I see.....haha. Really hope you kill it again this year brother! Continued success as always!
 

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
17,562
Tokens
Conan, best of luck this year.

I was initially looking at this game and at NW minus the points, but the more I look at it, I am leaning towards the over or no play on this game. I know I shouldn't go against my first instinct, but don't want to lay 10 with NW. Thought Cal should have won last year's game.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
I always love checking your threads Conan. Great picks. I'll be tailing on NW for sure, but I don't like betting on bad teams on the road so I am staying away from the Buffs. Best of luck, though. Cal stinks and I don't see them winning very many games this year.

Hey there SharpSquare. You ought to know that the CSU Rams will be wearing their white road jerseys in this game.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
Conan, best of luck this year.

I was initially looking at this game and at NW minus the points, but the more I look at it, I am leaning towards the over or no play on this game. I know I shouldn't go against my first instinct, but don't want to lay 10 with NW. Thought Cal should have won last year's game.

Well for making a comment like the one you just made BTD, I think I'm going to have to watch last year's game.
At least the road bugs will be biting the bears in their sleep. That was my first take...Cal on the road OOC = Ugh!

Gawd I just love talking about this kind of shit BTD.
Thanks for your input.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
7,158
Tokens
The dynamic of the CU vs CSU rivalry aka "Rocky Mountain Showdown" has changed somewhat in recent years. Before Colorado fell on such hard times I think CU tended to look past Colo St. somewhat as an inferior opponent, meanwhile CSU would treat this game as a chance to prove something against a BCS foe, almost a bowl game at the beginning of the season if you will. Now, looking at CU's schedule there's probably only 5 winnable games with this being one of them, so this game is now considered a priority. Meanwhile Colo St. proved last year that they could lose this game and still go on to have a successful season as they did last year with the bowl game win over Washington St.. Last year CSU had one of the most experienced OL (94 car st #6 FBS) and 4 of those starters are now gone including 1st team all MWC C Weston Richburg (2nd round pick of the NY Giants). Oddly enough their RB Kapri Bibbs who had almost 1800yds last year decided to enter the NFL draft and went un-drafted, he's now likely to end up on the Broncos practice squad. Perhaps he knew something about that OL as they gained 204 ypg (5.0)? For positives, Colo St. does return senior QB Garret Grayson who has reportedly looked very good in camp along with 5 of their top 6 receivers along with 7 returning starters on defense. Colorado returns 15 starters this year, although they lose their best (and only?) play maker in Paul Richardson, 2nd round pick to Seattle. Richardson provided most of their receiving offense, so w/o his services I'm not sure what they are gonna have. One point of concern is that this is a series that usually has gone to the dog, 11-4 ATS since 1998 but like I mentioned before, the fortunes of these two teams has changed quite a bit over those years. CSU does have a big game next week as well, having to travel to take on Boise on the blue turf in a revenge spot while Colo gets somewhat of a cupcake with Umass the following week.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
That was a very good situational analysis sendacash. I hope all of that helps to nail it.
 

RX Old-Timer
Joined
Sep 21, 2000
Messages
7,708
Tokens
Like the picks however thinking of going the other way on Cal@NW. With all the defections N'Western has had and thinking that Cal can really move the ball is a bit dangerous. Also this is a 3P kick so traveling east should not affect Cal as much. Not that NW wont pay attention to Cal however they have No Ill on deck and it's a program that has gotten a lot of pub the last few years for being very competitive. Thinking Cal keeps this one closer than expected.

BOL and I always enjoy your threads
 

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
875
Tokens
Glad to see you back Conan always a pleasure to hear views on my favorite conference. I like ucla to, don't think virgina can keep up with the offense and uclas front 7 is gonna be nasty this year with jack, kendrick, and a bunch of young and veterans d-linemen. And i haven't even mentioned Hundley yet. Hope it works out this year and best of luck.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
28,799
Tokens
Like the picks however thinking of going the other way on Cal@NW. With all the defections N'Western has had and thinking that Cal can really move the ball is a bit dangerous. Also this is a 3P kick so traveling east should not affect Cal as much. Not that NW wont pay attention to Cal however they have No Ill on deck and it's a program that has gotten a lot of pub the last few years for being very competitive. Thinking Cal keeps this one closer than expected.

BOL and I always enjoy your threads
Tough game for me to get a handle on. Cal has more raw talent than NW (top 30 Rivals recruiting). But NW has a ton more experience and the home field. The only thing I don't like about them is they dropped 7 of their last 8 games last season. I would think you need learn to to win again before winning by DD's. But who knows...
 

New member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
25
Tokens
Like the plays, Conan. Thanks for sharing.

I didn't lay the points with UCLA as the early start time makes me nervous, but no doubt they are the significantly better team
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
Pick this too.

Mike Leach isn't the kind of coach known for showing off. (I'm lying.)
Thursday night in front of the whole country? UBET. WEBET.

WSU-7½/Rutgers what's not to like about this "traditional" Pac-12-B1G tip-off to start the season? Think about that... it's a true Pac-12 Big-10 (or 15?) rumble. Conner Haliday, at last a mature senior QB should have himself a field day vs a lousy pass defense.

FOX Sports1
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
887
Tokens
Hey there SharpSquare. You ought to know that the CSU Rams will be wearing their white road jerseys in this game.

haha good call. I still won't bet the game though. Both those teams stink as far as I'm concerned. I try to steer clear of betting on bad teams. I always end up cursing and drinking too much.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
haha good call. I still won't bet the game though. Both those teams stink as far as I'm concerned. I try to steer clear of betting on bad teams. I always end up cursing and drinking too much.
SharpSquare,
For some reason I feel like spanking some chick's ass. That would make me feel pretty good. Just hard enough to make her squeal.

Leach's offense is resembling a bunch of slugs. I thought this was going to be about a little too much adrenalin and testosterone at the start. Now I am asking why I see all these Scarlett Knights shadowing every WSU receiver on the field. It's obvious who the stronger team is thus far. WSU resembles an FCS team. Rutgers looks like a B1G team. (How 'bout that?) .The only question left to ask is, now that Rutgers is officially a B1G team how well will they do in hoops since they have now become official B1G property?

This post was meant to be sarcastic... except for the "spanking" part.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
460
Tokens
Happy Football Day to you,
Agree with Col but I am concerned about the dl and its depth with the recent injury to de henington. Totally agree with about Coach Mac, the guy Cal should've and could've hired. About Cal, we know they're not a good team and we know they have a very good and underrated passing attack with Goff to Harper/Treggs/Lawler. We don't know how well the Ol will hold up to enable that passing attack. On defense the dl is very much improved with Scarlett, Barr and Jalill. These are former Tosh recruits that are 4 star guys. The depth behind them is weak as are the linebackers. The db's are young and the depth is also thin but remember that Cal was starting 165lb freshmen last yr that were out of position with no depth so be careful comparing to last year's debacle. Don't get me wrong this isn't a good team but it could be vastly improved and the passing attack has guys that very well could be playing on sundays soon. A Cal win wouldn't surprise me just as a blowout loss wouldn't surprise me either. Im holding out for -20' with ucla but I agree that they are elite and should be taking control of the SoCal recruiting scene with all the drama with the condoms.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
7,158
Tokens
Happy Football Day to you,
Agree with Col but I am concerned about the dl and its depth with the recent injury to de henington. Totally agree with about Coach Mac, the guy Cal should've and could've hired. About Cal, we know they're not a good team and we know they have a very good and underrated passing attack with Goff to Harper/Treggs/Lawler. We don't know how well the Ol will hold up to enable that passing attack. On defense the dl is very much improved with Scarlett, Barr and Jalill. These are former Tosh recruits that are 4 star guys. The depth behind them is weak as are the linebackers. The db's are young and the depth is also thin but remember that Cal was starting 165lb freshmen last yr that were out of position with no depth so be careful comparing to last year's debacle. Don't get me wrong this isn't a good team but it could be vastly improved and the passing attack has guys that very well could be playing on sundays soon. A Cal win wouldn't surprise me just as a blowout loss wouldn't surprise me either. Im holding out for -20' with ucla but I agree that they are elite and should be taking control of the SoCal recruiting scene with all the drama with the condoms.

Coach Mac does seem like a breath of fresh air as far as coaches go in Boulder, if you ever had to listen to the Zen master(Hawkins) or the NFL TE coach they hired after that. When asked about a player who stepped up his game, his response was Josh Tupou on the DL
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,922
Messages
13,575,244
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com