sucks, but they cant afford to stay here with the unions
Government raises Tax to meet payroll! At least 75% of City/State/Federal expenses are a I'll say Taxpayer subsidy to them popcorn-eatinggif
sucks, but they cant afford to stay here with the unions
No, it's actually all the taxes and regulations we have.
No, it's the overall higher costs in America due to higher regulations and taxes. If we cut those costs to undercut Mexico and China, companies will leave Mexico and China and come to America.Nope, when a company can produce something paying slave labor wages in another country, and not have to pay any duty to bring it back to the US, because of these giveaways to Businesses Trade Deals, that's what's causing this type shit.
The "overall higher cost" is salary. We can't undercut a Country that pays slave wages like $5 a day, no matter how many "regulations" and "taxes" are eliminated. Thankfully we're not a 3rd world Country and thankfully slavery is no longer allowed here. When we charge proper Duty from those Countries, we keep businesses here. But Without charging sufficient Duty, to make it worth a company's while to stay here, Shit Free Trade deals like NAFTA make it worth if for the Businesses to leave, and pay slave wages where they can get away with it. Bernie and Donnie are on the right side of this one.No, it's the overall higher costs in America due to higher regulations and taxes. If we cut those costs to undercut Mexico and China, companies will leave Mexico and China and come to America.
That's part of the higher costs, but there are other costs that they must pay for opening up shop overseas that they won't pay here, so it is plausible that you can cut away costs and undercut foreign competition. Considering Mexico and China are 2 of our 3 biggest trade partners, they could retaliate and costs us more jobs here.The "overall higher cost" is salary. We can't undercut a Country that pays slave wages like $5 a day, no matter how many "regulations" and "taxes" are eliminated. Thankfully we're not a 3rd world Country and thankfully slavery is no longer allowed here. When we charge proper Duty from those Countries, we keep businesses here. But Without charging sufficient Duty, to make it worth a company's while to stay here, Shit Free Trade deals like NAFTA make it worth if for the Businesses to leave, and pay slave wages where they can get away with it. Bernie and Donnie are on the right side of this one.
Just stfu
1400 families just ripped to shreds because some wetback mother fucker will work 16 hour days for 5 dollars a day and no lunch break
*****Trump for president*****
The "overall higher cost" is salary. We can't undercut a Country that pays slave wages like $5 a day, no matter how many "regulations" and "taxes" are eliminated. Thankfully we're not a 3rd world Country and thankfully slavery is no longer allowed here. When we charge proper Duty from those Countries, we keep businesses here. But Without charging sufficient Duty, to make it worth a company's while to stay here, Shit Free Trade deals like NAFTA make it worth if for the Businesses to leave, and pay slave wages where they can get away with it. Bernie and Donnie are on the right side of this one.
well it's the respectful thing to do from the employer standpointWhat is the advantage of telling them now? When you are laying someone off, don't give them a year notice.
well it's the respectful thing to do from the employer standpoint
given how the crowd reacted, if their performance suffers over the next year, it makes them look like more of an asshole.
The employees who have no real reason to care though knowing they can get unemployment will just do shoddy jobs on the assembly line and some will intentionally sabotage the product to hurt the company all while looking for a job in the next year.
If I were that employer, I would not do that. If you lay them off that day and agree to pay unemployment in Indiana, you get it for 6 months at a max of $400 a week depending on income.
1.) the employees will find out on thier own and panicWhat is the advantage of telling them now? When you are laying someone off, don't give them a year notice.