very interesting; thoughts please

[sammythesage]

as posted earlier wanted to know consensus picks. after further research the following teams have more than 70% "Action" (meaning # of people wagering on that team). Has nothing to do w/amount of money wagered on said team. Very interesting indeed. Well let's post these teams and see how the hypothetical major does!!! Pro games by the way are even more lopsided as some of these games have 90% on one side.
pitt-4.5
minn.-3.5
tb-4
kc-7.5
gb-7.5
sf-7
curious as to how this turns out.

 

[sammythesage]

college was 7-9 so joe public sucks as we know.

 

[sammythesage]

well no thoughts? saw shrinks article. good read.

 

[dimeplayersonly]

all public plays


one difference

sharps took
pitt -4
tb-4, -5
houston +9

when both public and sharps are on the same side, the public takes the bad numbers

 

[88cents]

Thanks for the info cuz I always like to play against the public. Where do you get your info?

 

[Oorang]

so far, so good says Joe Public

 

[sammythesage]

4-2 this week, was the public. last two games evenly split. bookies got killed.

 

[dimeplayersonly]

SAMMY THE SAGE............morning games went publics way

afternoon games all went books way

except maybe wash/gmen

gbay.....
san
seattle
balt...........line move on diego -2 at gt.......got into sharps pockets too

dont know where you got your morning stats.........but at kickoff action was heavy on all fav's again..........

 

[sammythesage]

and your point being??? the books took a beating on the onesided games. sharps, public, whatever.

 

[dimeplayersonly]

Sammy............sorry its a misunderstanding my way...

going by the games you listed

pitt
minny
kc
tb
gb
san fran

yes the books lost on the first four.......by gametime books were heavy on gb and sanfran......so public went 4-2

even with the morning chalks covering, the late games pulled them out of the hole..........

 

[dimeplayersonly]

with all the talk about how bad the books took a beating today in the other forums, i was just pointing out that they really didnt do bad.......

didnt realize you were basing the outcome only on those games you listed.............gl

 

[masonh]

what kind of sharps bet on Houston?